Channel
@Try_To_Take
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
97subscribers
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001747776298 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Try_To_Take |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 14 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 1 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Try_To_Take |
Growth history is still building. We hold one measurement for this entry. A trend needs at least two, taken days apart — so this will fill in on its own rather than being estimated. We do not publish numbers we have not measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 18:33 | 97 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 7 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 16 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
19 reactions across 8 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 8 | 42.1% | |
| 👎 | 6 | 31.6% | |
| 🔥 | 5 | 26.3% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 19reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 7 March 2026 to 16 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Хорошая книга по ОС Даёт боевое введение сразу в отличии от Таненбаума. Да в полной версии ~1000 страниц. Но в сжатой версии всего 700. И разделы разбиты так, что можно читать по частям. Только на английском. P.S Отсутствуют в essentials: Deadlocks (7§ в full) Virtual Machines (16§) Distributed Systems (17§) Influential Operating Systems (исторический обзор ОС) (20§) И совсем продвинутые приложения в конце полной к…
🔥1
99% мемов (старше 5 лет) про IT стали несмешными, после бума LLM
Доклад AI Safety Research 2026 Считаю этот доклад интересным. Выпущен "Department for Science, Innovation & Technology" (бывший BEIS и DCMS, который Риши Сунак переорганизовал в новое нечто. Можно считать аналогом МинОбра и МинЦифры вместе взятых и делённых пополам). Обычный критерий для любого типа ресерчей это период остывания. Не читаем статью месяц (если это не несет риски конечно же), далее открываем и смотрим…
Актуальность рекламной кампании
👍1
Первому покупателю приготовиться! Онии ждут, а те кто заранее подготовился спокойны. Интернет оккупасы в предвкушении, а светочи новых свобод рады. Цифровой глаз дал две таблетки, а вам оставил выбор.
Отмена моего участия Я снимаюсь с программы eprstconf. Быть совсем неготовым перед аудиторией - хуже, чем честно отказаться. Это полностью моя ответственность. Но я всё равно советую вам прийти. Событие будет сильным и без меня, поверьте. Не дайте моему форс-мажору испортить себе вечер.
👎4
Лучшая покупка Невероятно удачный товар, который я приобрел из последних 3 лет это Мышь Delux Seeker M618XS в черном цвете Пользуясь классическими мышами на настольном ПК у меня через время начала легко болеть кисть, погуглив узнал о ужасной болезни в виде карпального туннельного синдрома (CTS) , который лечиться только тренировками и подбором грамотной мышки и позиции работы с ней. Решив не тянуть до похода к вра…
Photo, posted without a caption
Залетаем в топы Apple Music Обнаружил интересный баг музыки. Треки, которые в своё начало ставят определенный отрывок (например жанр phonk в данном треке) попадают в подборку песен по этому жанру. Так как это походу не единичный случай и авторы во всю используют это, то предполагаю, что проблема в анализаторе. Shazam пользуется похожей техникой распознавания песен, даже если отрывок прослушанный вами относиться к о…
Красивых картиночек в ленту https://blog.stuffedcow.net/2019/09/hard-disk-geometry-microbenchmarking/
Дорогой дневник мне не описать всю ту боль, что я пережил в поиске и починке лучшей литературе по теме: "Oбрaбoткa сигнaлoв. Пeрвoe знaкoмствo". Юкиo Сaтo. 1999 год. "Бeз пaники! Цифрoвaя oбрaбoткa сигнaлoв". Юкиo Сaтo. 2010 гoд.
Статья охватывающая подробно все аспекты планировщика для процессора
👍3
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @Try_To_Take. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,238,305 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Try_To_Take” (@Try_To_Take), 97 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Try_To_Take.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.