Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
14 measurements spanning 41 days, net +289. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,343–6,718 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
16 Sept 2026, 10:01
6,675
+58
13 Sept 2026, 01:59
6,617
+103
8 Sept 2026, 22:38
6,514
+33
3 Sept 2026, 10:06
6,481
+7
31 Aug 2026, 10:57
6,474
+50
28 Aug 2026, 11:24
6,424
+15
25 Aug 2026, 06:29
6,409
+8
22 Aug 2026, 08:17
6,401
-3
18 Aug 2026, 22:14
6,404
+10
16 Aug 2026, 08:43
6,394
+5
13 Aug 2026, 05:13
6,389
+2
7 Aug 2026, 14:16
6,387
+1
6 Aug 2026, 19:50
6,386
no change
6 Aug 2026, 19:49
6,386
first reading
Engagement
27 posts held, back to 22 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 9 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 27 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
26m 29s
Average length
8m 50s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
157 reactions across 21 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 58.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
92
58.6%
🔥
32
20.4%
👏
15
9.55%
👍
11
7.01%
👎
7
4.46%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 21 of the 27 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 157 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 27 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🎥 شروع دوره #رایگان Network+ در TryHackBox - قسمت اول
قسمت دوم آموزش Network+ در TryHackBox آماده شده.
در قسمت اول، آموزش از مباحث ابتدایی Chapter 1 : Introduction to Networks شروع شد و حالا ادامه ی مباحث رو دنبال می کنیم.
قبل از اینکه ضبط قسمت های بعدی رو ادامه بدیم، میخوایم این قسمت رو ببینید و نظر واقعی تون رو بدونیم.
چند چیز برای ما مهمه:
🔹 نحوه تدریس و توضیح مطالب چطور بود؟
🔹 سرعت و بیان مدرس مناسب بود؟…
🎥 شروع دوره #رایگان Network+ در TryHackBox - معرفی دوره
یکی از مدرسین تیم TryHackBox ( اقای حسین نائیجی ) ضبط دوره Network+ رو شروع کرده و اولین و دومین ویدئو آماده شده.
برای تهیه این دوره از زیر استفاده شده است :
📘 CompTIA Network+ Study Guide
🎯 N10-009
اما قبل از اینکه ضبط ادامه دوره رو شروع کنیم، میخوایم اول نظر خودتون رو بدونیم.
ویدئو رو ببینید و صادقانه بهمون بگید:
🔹 نحوه تدریس و توضیح مطالب چطوره؟
🔹 سرعت…
🔎 Google Dork Challenge | Exposed Files
یه Google Dork ساده، ولی با چندین Extension که هرکدوم میتونن داستان متفاوتی داشته باشن.
اگر قرار باشه فقط یک مورد رو برای بررسی در یک Authorized Security Assessment انتخاب کنی، کدوم رو انتخاب میکنی؟
log | env | conf | bak | git | htpasswd | json
🎯 سؤال فقط این نیست که کدوم خطرناک تره؛ مهم اینه که چرا.
این بار Challenge رو بردیم روی LinkedIn تا ببینیم کدوم انتخاب بیشتری…
⭕️ دیگر کانال ها و شبکه های اجتماعی ما را دنبال کنید :
💠 کانال های تلگرام ما :
🔶 آموزش تست نفوذ و Red Team
🆔 @TryHackBox
🔶 رودمپ های مختلف
🆔 @TryHackBoxOfficial
🔶 داستان های هک
🆔 @TryHackBoxStory
🔶 آموزش برنامه نویسی
🆔 @TryCodeBox
🔶 رادیو زیروپاد ( پادکست ها )
🆔 @RadioZeroPod
➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖
👥 گروه های پرسش و پاسخ
🔷 هک و امنیت
🆔 @TryHackBoxGroup
🔷 برنامه نویسی
🆔 @TryCodeBoxGroup
➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖
🔴 اینستاگر…
🧠 ذهنیت یک ردتیمر
#RedTeam
یک ردتیمر فقط ابزار یاد نمیگیرد.
مهمترین مهارت، نوع تفکر است.
چند اصل مهم:
🔹 همیشه مثل مهاجم فکر کن.
ا🔹 TTPهای گروههای مهاجم را مطالعه کن.
🔹 همیشه در حال یادگیری باش.
🔹 فقط به آسیب پذیری نگاه نکن؛ به کل مسیر حمله فکر کن.
🔹 امنیت فقط تکنولوژی نیست؛ انسان و فرآیند هم مهم هستند.
یک هکر که بداند چگونه سیستم را بشکند،
بهتر میداند چگونه آن را امن کند.
این تفاوت یک ردتیمر واقعی است.
@K…
⭕ 100 آسیب پذیری وب دسته بندی شده در انواع مختلف
https://lnkd.in/p/dGAC7jAD
📌 اگر این نوع محتوا برای شما مفید است، با دنبال کردن صفحه LinkedIn TryHackBox و حمایت از طریق لایک و اشتراکگذاری، به رشد این مسیر کمک کنید.
اگر اسیب پذیری دیگری از قلم افتاده کامنت کنید .
📌 فصل اول :: اپیزود دوم از سری مباحث SOC پادکست
⭕ اپیزود ۲ : پیشنیازهایی که باید بلد باشید (چرا بدون درک شبکه نمی توان کارشناس soc شد؟ آشنایی اولیه با سیستمعامل ها (تفاوت تحلیل لاگ های ویندوز و لینوکس).
معرفی ابزار Wireshark (دیدن پکتها زیر ذرهبین)
🎙 راوی : خانم زهرا خادمی
🆔 @RadioZeroPod
🆔 @TryHackBox
🆔 @TryHackBoxOfficial
🆔 @AiTHB
📢 فراخوان همکاری داوطلبانه
در حال توسعه یک پلتفرم آموزشی امنیت سایبری هستیم و برای تکمیل تیم، از افراد علاقهمند و متخصص دعوت میکنیم بهصورت داوطلبانه در کنار ما همکاری کنند و در ساخت یک پروژه آموزشی ارزشمند برای جامعه امنیت سایبری نقش داشته باشند.
🔹 موقعیتهای همکاری
🛡 متخصص امنیت وب (Web Security)
اگر در حوزه امنیت وب و تست نفوذ تجربه دارید، به کمک شما برای بررسی، تحلیل و ایمن سازی بخش Authentication و موارد …
دورک های مفید برای باگ هانترها که میتوانند از آنها برای پیدا کردن اطلاعات حساس استفاده کنند: 👇🏻
📌 در:
https://lnkd.in/p/dF-jW4mR
اگر این نوع محتوا برای شما مفید است، با دنبال کردن صفحه LinkedIn TryHackBox و حمایت از طریق لایک و اشتراکگذاری، به رشد این مسیر کمک کنید.
@TryHackBox
#باگ_بانتی
👍6❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 27 posts we hold for @TryHackBox. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
با توجه به دو قسمت اول Network+، این سبک آموزش رو چطور دیدید؟
🔥 خیلی خوب بود، همین سبک ادامه پیدا کنه39%
👍 خوب بود، چندتا نکته جای بهبود داره14%
👌 قابل قبول بود، ولی میتونه بهتر بشه12%
🤔 هنوز برای قضاوت زوده25%
❌ دوره Network + ادامه ندید11%
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 27 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 11 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 11 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Try Hack Box” (@TryHackBox), 6,675 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TryHackBox.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.