Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Энциклопедия музыки всех жанров и стилей

@TopAlbumsEveryYear

On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

264subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001913928283
TypeChannel
Username@TopAlbumsEveryYear
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/TopAlbumsEveryYear

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 89% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

No sample pairs were kept for this entry. The counts below were measured, but without the pairs there is nothing here for you to open and check, so treat the relationship as recorded rather than demonstrated.

Every channel this entry shares post bodies with
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@Pulse_T_Invest11 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minutethis entry (110)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 0 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 17 comparable posts for this entry, running 15 January 2026 to 7 June 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Across the whole group of 2, the earliest publisher we hold is @TopAlbumsEveryYear — which is this entry. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the key clone_source, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

2647 Aug 2026, 06:18 — 264 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 16:26 — 264 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 06:187 Aug 2026, 16:26
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 263–265 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Aug 2026, 16:26264no change
7 Aug 2026, 06:18264first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 10 January 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

73 reactions across 20 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 57.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
4257.5%
👍1723.3%
🔥1115.1%
👏22.74%
🍓11.37%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 73reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 10 January 2026 to 8 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

8 Jun 2026, 09:32 UTC96 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Топ 20 самых вызывающих парфюмов. Ссылка здесь 👉🏻 https://www.fragrantica.ru/board/viewtopic.php?pid=4375747#p4375747

1🍓1👍1

7 Jun 2026, 08:19 UTC93 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Тут составил топ 20 лучших кожано-фруктовых ароматов в истории Ссылка здесь 👉🏻 https://www.fragrantica.ru/board/viewtopic.php?pid=4375286#p4375286

👍21🔥1

7 Jun 2026, 07:55 UTC81 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Опубликовал топ лучших парфюмов с замшей в истории 👉🏻 Ссылка здесь https://www.fragrantica.ru/board/viewtopic.php?pid=4375275#p4375275

👍21🔥1

24 Mar 2026, 10:44 UTC142 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Ещё один классный и душевный биографический фильм про человека с синдромом Туретта. На подобии фильмы - шедевры, которые тоже обязательны к просмотру: «Я ругаюсь», «Вселенная Стивена Хокинга», «Игры разума» 👍🏻 У актёра фамилия русская Волк, возможно его предки из России. Кстати, не исключаю что этот актер брат близнец Ивана Урганта ☝🏻 Также работает волонтёром в «Camp Twitch and Shout» в Джорджии, лагере для детей от

2👍1

9 Mar 2026, 20:21 UTC210 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Лёгкий поп альбом, но с одним шедевром. Девушка, поёт как Бьёрк - 7 👍🏻 И 9 композиция тоже интересная, сделана в стиле 70-х 👍🏻 https://musify.club/release/royksopp-the-understanding-2005-782

4

8 Mar 2026, 20:08 UTC130 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Второй альбом разок послушать можно. Выделю 8-9, 12 👌🏻 https://musify.club/release/evil-nine-they-live-2008-24192

2

8 Mar 2026, 18:34 UTC113 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Ещё нарыл редкую группу 👍🏻 Выделил бы 1-2, 6, 15 👍🏻 https://musify.club/release/evil-nine-you-can-be-special-too-an-album-2004-24190

3

3 Mar 2026, 00:18 UTC179 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Вот понравился отзыв от геймера со стажем, он более точно написал, что я думаю: 👇🏻 И да — я геймер со стажем, хоть и не стар. И я проходил тот самый первый Сайлент Хилл на первой плойке — без пиратских переводов и прочей мишуры. И я проходил тот самый Сайлент Хилл 2 на компе, в честь коей части франшизы и снят этот фильм. И, в целом, с учетом низких оценок всех вас, я ожидал унылое помоище. Что ж — первая рецензия,

2

3 Mar 2026, 00:08 UTC147 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Возвращение в Сайлент Хилл 2026 👏🏻 Если сравнивать с первой частью, то этот уступает, но тоже достаточно сильным получился 👏🏻 Тут даже ещё больше монстров, которых обходили стороной в предыдущих частях. Тут даже много кадров, похожих на игру. 9-10 баллов. Но конечно первая часть непревзойденная никаким хоррором в истории ☝🏻 Пока низкий рейтинг, как и у Бойцовского клуба первые годы тоже рейтинг был 3-5, спустя годы

2

21 Feb 2026, 17:13 UTC156 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Конечно, саундтрек - шедевр, и Мэнсэлл - гений, но Ник Кейв для фильма про Джесси Джеймса ничуть не хуже сделал саундтрек, скорее даже лучше. А Ганс Зиммер уже у Ника Кейва понатырил для своих «шедевров» 🤷‍♂️ Вообще, страшный саундтрек, показывает все ужасы американской жизни. В музыке все кошмары показаны. Поэтому слабонервным не слушать, а фильм можете посмотреть. Ибо это шедевр мирового кино. https://musify.club

3👍1👏1

20 Feb 2026, 21:50 UTC146 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Неплохой саундтрек получился к игре от Трапанезе, хотя базируется полностью на саундтреке Daft Punk. Конечно, Дафт панку он проигрывает, но выделю интересные треки: 1-2, 4, 14-18. В концовке Трапанезе разогнался нехило 👍🏻 https://musify.club/release/tron-uprising-ost-tron-vosstanie-caundtrek-2013-355979

1👍1🔥1

19 Feb 2026, 22:34 UTC127 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026

У Nine inch nails была непростая задача, сделать саундтрек после Daft punk. Так-то слушать можно, но даже чуть приблизиться к Дафт Панк у них точно не вышло. Тот саундтрек к Трону 2010 года я вообще считаю одним из лучших саундтреков в истории. ☝🏻 А уж я тысячи саундтреков переслушал всех времён, начиная с 50-х. Я выкладывал ранее тот саундтрек вроде. Если нет, то позже выложу его тоже. А на этом саундтреке пока толь

2👍1🔥1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @TopAlbumsEveryYear. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 417,546 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Энциклопедия музыки всех жанров и стилей” (@TopAlbumsEveryYear), 264 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TopAlbumsEveryYear.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.