Video message, posted without a caption
❤8🔥1

Channel
@Tolik_Sorokin
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
136subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002098158751 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Tolik_Sorokin |
| Description | Привет путник) Это мой личный канал, здесь публикую различную движуху происходящую в моей жизни и жизни моих близких, с их разрешения, конечно ;) Моя команда https://t.me/iz_metro Наша музыка https://band.link/iz_metro |
| Created | 27 February 2024 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Tolik_Sorokin |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 23:31 | 136 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 20:01 | 136 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 25 December 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
300 reactions across 19 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 139 | 46.3% | |
| 🔥 | 76 | 25.3% | |
| 👍 | 30 | 10.0% | |
| 🥰 | 16 | 5.33% | |
| 😍 | 10 | 3.33% | |
| 😐 | 8 | 2.67% | |
| ❤🔥 | 7 | 2.33% | |
| 😎 | 7 | 2.33% | |
| 🫡 | 4 | 1.33% | |
| 👎 | 2 | 0.667% | |
| 💯 | 1 | 0.333% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 300reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 25 December 2024 to 4 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Video message, posted without a caption
❤8🔥1
А вот поглядите-ка!!! Мой любимый ансамбль песни и пляски ВКС выпустил крутой трек А ещё там солирует наш любимый Анатолий «Из метро» Сорокин. Вот. Всё. А ещё. Я музыку написала))))
❤🔥7❤5
2000 прослушиваний песни Русский город Одесса за сутки - круто, спасибо вам! На прошлой репетиции сделали небольшое видео на эту песню, на котором пытливый зритель увидит и нашу новую солистку - Анастасию. С наступающим Днём народного единства, родные! Пусть гудят корабли в порту, С пирса смотрит на волны рыбак, И полощется на ветру Наш красивый трёхцветный флаг! Русский город Одесса на: Яндекс музыке VK музыке М…
❤11🔥7
Неповторимый оригинал и - превосходная пародия от Анатолия и молчаливого рыжего свидетеля. В каментах пишут, куда пропали - ребза, готовимся к концерту, репетируем, доделываем одну важную песню - надо успеть её выпустить и разучить. Кстати, тут опытные люди рекомендуют выступать с плэйбеком - мол, все артисты так делают, давайте тоже, чтобы музон звучал жирнее. Кто в теме - что думаете об этом? Вы за трушность полн…
🔥6❤2👍2
Video message, posted without a caption
❤6🔥6🥰2
Video, posted without a caption
❤13
Video message, posted without a caption
❤12😍4
Выступал в госпитале. Пацанам желаю скорейшего выздоровления и силы духа.
❤21🥰6🫡4
Малышка не очень проявила интерес, но мы то знаем что в 6 лет начнутся эти мучения 😈 Муз. школу придется закончить, вариантов нет 😈😈😈
😐8👍4👎2💯1
Video message, posted without a caption
👍8
Video message, posted without a caption
❤8🔥6🥰3
Video message, posted without a caption
❤5🔥4
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Tolik_Sorokin. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Алкоголь - это проблема?
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 25 December 2024 to 4 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Анатолий Сорокин” (@Tolik_Sorokin), 136 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Tolik_Sorokin.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.