Tonpay ES pinned a GIF

Channel
Tonpay ES
@TheTonpayEs
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
25subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001965561646 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @TheTonpayEs |
| Description | Plataforma de soluciones de criptopagos para empresas 💎 Nuestro sitio web — thetonpay.app Chat en español — @TonpayChatEs Aplicación — business.thetonpay.app Fuentes en inglés: Canal principal — @TheTonpay Chat — @TonpayChatEn |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 2 May 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/TheTonpayEs |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 10:04 | 25 | no change |
| 9 Aug 2026, 10:15 | 25 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 2 May 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 15
- Links
- 11
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
205 reactions across 18 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 56 | 27.3% | |
| 🔥 | 40 | 19.5% | |
| 👍 | 33 | 16.1% | |
| 👏 | 26 | 12.7% | |
| 🎉 | 16 | 7.80% | |
| ❤🔥 | 7 | 3.41% | |
| 😢 | 5 | 2.44% | |
| 🤩 | 5 | 2.44% | |
| 🥰 | 5 | 2.44% | |
| 💘 | 3 | 1.46% | |
| 🌚 | 2 | 0.976% | |
| 🤝 | 2 | 0.976% | |
| ⚡ | 1 | 0.488% | |
| 👨💻 | 1 | 0.488% | |
| 💔 | 1 | 0.488% | |
| 😨 | 1 | 0.488% | |
| 🤔 | 1 | 0.488% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 205reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 2 May 2023 to 7 August 2023, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Tonpay está cerrando 💔 Es muy difícil para nosotros compartir estas noticias con ustedes, pero nuestro equipo está deteniendo el trabajo en el proyecto Tonpay. Desafortunadamente, nuestro producto fue creado en el momento equivocado y en el lugar equivocado. Estamos extremadamente agradecidos con nuestros clientes, suscriptores y socios: llenaron nuestro camino de significado. Gracias a su apoyo, hemos alcanzado mu…
😢5💔1😨1
💎 The Open Network (Q2 2023)
❤🔥3👍2🔥2
¿Crees que los swaps automáticos en Tonpay son una buena idea?
- Sí, ¡es un cambio total para los pagos con criptomonedas!69%
- No estoy seguro, necesito más información.19%
- No, prefiero manejar manualmente las converiones de mis criptomonedas.0%
- No uso las criptomonedas para pagos13%
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
❤5
Swaps automáticos de Tonpay: ¡Una nueva forma de pagar con criptomonedas! #idea 📈Las DeFi y los pagos con criptomonedas han ido en aumento. Sin embargo, la volatilidad del mercado puede hacer que sea arriesgado aceptar pagos con criptomonedas 💎. 🔄 Los swaps automáticos de Tonpay podrían resolver este problema al convertir automáticamente una criptomoneda a otra que creas que podría ser menos volátil. Por ejemplo, p…
❤4🔥4👍2
¡Bienvenido Tonpay en tonradar! 🧭 📣 ¡Nos complace anunciar que Tonpay está oficialmente listado en tonradar! Haz un seguimiento de los volúmenes de transacciones sin esfuerzo, disfruta de gráficos y estadísticas fáciles de usar, y descubre las aplicaciones más populares en el juego. 🥇Actualmente, Tonpay ocupa el impresionante puesto 13, pero estamos decididos a llegar al top 10 muy pronto. ¡Mantente atento a nosotr…
❤4🔥4👏3🥰2❤🔥1
¡Presentamos el SDK de Python para la integración de pagos con criptomonedas! 👨💻 🚀 Ahora puedes comenzar a aceptar pagos con criptomonedas fácilmente con nuestro SDK de Python de alto nivel. Además, ¡te tenemos una documentación muy comprensible! 🛍 ¡Integra los pagos directamente en tu sitio web o bot sin esfuerzos! Con nuestro SDK de Python, puedes simplificar el proceso de pago y ofrecer a tus clientes una forma…
❤3👍3👏2👨💻1💘1
¿Qué piensas sobre aceptar monedas estables nativas o envueltas?
- ¡Me encantaría aceptar monedas nativas estables con Tonpay!75%
- Prefiero las versiones wrapped0%
- Quiero aceptar ambas25%
- ¡No aceptaré monedas estables para nada!0%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
👍6❤4🔥3👏1
¡Wapped vs monedas estables nativas: Queremos tu opinión! 🤔 ¡Nos encantó su opinión en el post anterior y pensamos que podemos compartir más ideas con ustedes! 🫶 Estamos emocionados de interactuar con ustedes una vez más sobre un tema importante: monedas wrapped vs monedas estables nativas. 💭 Nos encantaría conocer tus ideas sobre aceptar pagos en USDT/USDC nativos, ya sea además o en lugar de las versiones envuel…
🔥4👍3❤2🤩2🤔1
¿Qué opinas acerca de la integración de la IA en Tonpay?
- ¡La primera idea es genial!36%
- ¡La segunda idea es genial!7%
- ¡Ambas ideas son buenas!57%
- No me gusta ninguna de las dos ideas :(0%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
¿Qué beneficios puede traer la integración de 🤖IA a Tonpay? La Inteligencia Artificial (IA) se ha convertido en una importante tendencia tecnológica, y su importancia seguirá creciendo. Hemos estado considerando cómo la IA puede mejorar Tonpay, y aquí están nuestras ideas: 📊 Analítica avanzada: Tonpay ya te permite rastrear fácilmente la rentabilidad de la tienda y el gasto del cliente. ¡Con la IA, podemos analizar…
❤4🌚2👍2👏1🤩1
FAQ: ¡Tu guía para entender Tonpay! — ¿Cómo empiezo en Tonpay? 📞 ¡Empezar con Tonpay es fácil! Puedes contactarnos para que te ayudemos a integrar nuestro SDK. Si prefieres, puedes reservar una llamada de demostración de 30 minutos donde te mostraremos nuestro sistema de pagos y responderemos cualquier pregunta que tengas. Si prefieres intentarlo por ti mismo, puedes probar nuestro portal de comerciantes en Testnet…
❤7👍6👏3🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @TheTonpayEs. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
¿Crees que los swaps automáticos en Tonpay son una buena idea?
- Sí, ¡es un cambio total para los pagos con criptomonedas!69%
- No estoy seguro, necesito más información.19%
- No, prefiero manejar manualmente las converiones de mis criptomonedas.0%
- No uso las criptomonedas para pagos13%
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
¿Qué piensas sobre aceptar monedas estables nativas o envueltas?
- ¡Me encantaría aceptar monedas nativas estables con Tonpay!75%
- Prefiero las versiones wrapped0%
- Quiero aceptar ambas25%
- ¡No aceptaré monedas estables para nada!0%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
¿Qué opinas acerca de la integración de la IA en Tonpay?
- ¡La primera idea es genial!36%
- ¡La segunda idea es genial!7%
- ¡Ambas ideas son buenas!57%
- No me gusta ninguna de las dos ideas :(0%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 2 May 2023 to 7 August 2023. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 682,840 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Tonpay ES” (@TheTonpayEs), 25 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TheTonpayEs.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.