Tonpay pinned a GIF

Channel
Tonpay
@TheTonpay
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
102subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001891045336 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @TheTonpay |
| Description | Platform of crypto payment solutions for businesses 💎 Our website — thetonpay.app English chat — @TonpayChatEn Twitter — twitter.com/TheTonpay App — business.thetonpay.app Russian sources: Main channel — @TheTonPayRu Chat — @TonPayChatRu |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 10 May 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/TheTonpay |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 10:01 | 102 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 08:58 | 102 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 10 May 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 35
- Videos
- 2
- Links
- 43
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
287 reactions across 17 posts, in 26 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 24.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 70 | 24.4% | |
| ❤ | 49 | 17.1% | |
| 👍 | 44 | 15.3% | |
| 😢 | 23 | 8.01% | |
| 🎉 | 15 | 5.23% | |
| 💯 | 14 | 4.88% | |
| 🤩 | 9 | 3.14% | |
| 👏 | 8 | 2.79% | |
| 🫡 | 8 | 2.79% | |
| 🍾 | 6 | 2.09% | |
| 🏆 | 6 | 2.09% | |
| ✍ | 5 | 1.74% | |
| 🆒 | 4 | 1.39% | |
| 💔 | 4 | 1.39% | |
| ❤🔥 | 3 | 1.05% | |
| 😍 | 3 | 1.05% | |
| 🥰 | 3 | 1.05% | |
| 👀 | 2 | 0.697% | |
| 🤓 | 2 | 0.697% | |
| 🤷 | 2 | 0.697% | |
| 6 further kinds | 7 | 2.44% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 287reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 10 May 2023 to 7 August 2023, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Tonpay is shutting down 💔 It's very difficult for us to share these news with you, but our team is stopping the work on the Tonpay project. Unfortunately, our product was created at the wrong time and in the wrong place. We are extremely grateful to our customers, subscribers and partners - you filled our path with meaning. Thanks to your support, we have reached many heights. We are very proud of our results and t…
😢23🫡7💔4❤2👍1🤝1😁1
💎 The Open Network (Q2 2023)
👍9🔥5❤3
Tonstarter mentioned Tonpay at the Ecosystem Overview of The Open Network (Q2 2023)!🔥🚀
👍6🔥4❤3
Do you think Tonpay's auto swaps are a good idea?
- Yes, it's a game-changer for crypto payments!66%
- I'm not sure, I need more information.20%
- No, I prefer to handle crypto conversions manually.5%
- I don't use crypto for payments.10%
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Tonpay's Auto Swaps: A New Way to Pay with Crypto! #idea 📈 DeFi and crypto payments have been on the rise. But the volatility of the market can make it risky to accept crypto payments. 🔄 Tonpay automatic swaps could solve this problem by automatically converting one cryptocurrency to another that you think might be less volatile. For example, you could accept payments in any cryptocurrency, but would always receive…
👍4💯4❤3🔥2
Welcome Tonpay on tonradar! 🧭 📣 We are excited to announce that Tonpay is now officially listed on tonradar! Track transaction volumes effortlessly, enjoy user-friendly charts and stats, and discover the hottest apps in the game. 🥇 Currently, Tonpay holds the impressive 13th spot, but we are determined to make it into the top 10 very soon. Keep an eye out for us on the main page as we climb the ranks! Go to Tonrad…
🎉6🔥5❤4👍2❤🔥1
Introducing the Python SDK for Crypto Payments Integration! 👨💻 🚀 Now you can easily start accepting crypto payments with our high-level Python SDK. Plus, we've got you covered with comprehensive documentation! 🛍 Integrate payments directly into your website or bot effortlessly! With our Python SDK, you can streamline the payment process and offer your customers a convenient way to pay in crypto. Isn't that cool? …
🔥7🎉4👏4❤1👍1
What are your thoughts on accepting native or wrapped stablecoins?
- I'd love to accept native stablecoins via Tonpay!50%
- I'm ok with wrapped stablecoins.17%
- I want to accept both.30%
- I wouldn't accept stablecoins at all!3%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Wrapped vs. Native Stablecoins: We Want Your Opinion! 🤔 We loved your feedback on the previous post and thought that we can share more ideas with you! 🫶 We're excited to engage with you once again on an important topic: wrapped vs. native stablecoins. 💭 We'd love to hear your thoughts on accepting payments in native USDT/USDC, either in addition to or instead of the wrapped versions. Your opinion matters to us, and…
👍4🤩3❤2😍1
What do you think about AI integration in Tonpay?
- The first idea is cool!19%
- The second idea is great!6%
- Both ideas are good!48%
- I don't like both ideas :(26%
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
✍5🤷2
What benefits can 🤖 AI integration bring to Tonpay? Artificial Intelligence (AI) has become a major technological trend, and its significance will continue to grow. We've been considering how AI can improve Tonpay, and here are our ideas: 📊 Advanced analytics: Tonpay already allows you to easily track store profitability and customer spending. With AI, we can analyze even more data and predict the growth of your bu…
🔥4👀2👍2🤓2❤1👏1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @TheTonpay. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Do you think Tonpay's auto swaps are a good idea?
- Yes, it's a game-changer for crypto payments!66%
- I'm not sure, I need more information.20%
- No, I prefer to handle crypto conversions manually.5%
- I don't use crypto for payments.10%
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
What are your thoughts on accepting native or wrapped stablecoins?
- I'd love to accept native stablecoins via Tonpay!50%
- I'm ok with wrapped stablecoins.17%
- I want to accept both.30%
- I wouldn't accept stablecoins at all!3%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
What do you think about AI integration in Tonpay?
- The first idea is cool!19%
- The second idea is great!6%
- Both ideas are good!48%
- I don't like both ideas :(26%
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 10 May 2023 to 7 August 2023. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,045,288 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Tonpay” (@TheTonpay), 102 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TheTonpay.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.