Channel
@TheCodeschannel
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Advertising · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
247subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001589853054 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @TheCodeschannel |
| Description | Official Announcement channel for TheCodes Funds. Community Group : |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 31 January 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/TheCodeschannel |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Aug 2026, 02:30 | 247 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 02:01 | 247 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 24 October 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 18 July 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
18 reactions across 5 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 7 | 38.9% | |
| 👀 | 5 | 27.8% | |
| ❤ | 4 | 22.2% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 5.56% | |
| 😱 | 1 | 5.56% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 18reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 24 October 2024 to 18 July 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor.A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
| erid | Posts | First seen | Last seen |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20250718101214112415010300166300032512288 | 1 | 18 July 2025 | 18 July 2025 |
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 24 October 2024 to 18 July 2025. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Aku lagi sebar DANA Kaget nih! Yuk, sikat segera sebelum melayang 💸💸💸 https://link.dana.id/danakaget?c= sgnagq8dd& r=ioyRgI&orderId = 20250718101214112415010300166300032512288 Gasssssssssss kan
Signed Musuri
Jam 8
Signed Musuri
Ada yg aktif gk ini? Mau kasih GA di Dana, seadanya aja ya, gk jepe soalnya😂
🔥4
Signed Musuri
Gas kan legend Submit & verif email https://legend.xyz/waitlist
Signed Musuri
https://x.com/InnBioresearch https://www.daos.fun/HPX7hR9msKu7sJ8vf3C3QFDiy92NX8K5gVryDcic5xk8 #Dyor
Signed Musuri
$TİEN (sol) Ca:A32srE1PEG8kxAVDM5jbawRKT6GpzJPWvZwrnukHHPjx The third project I’d like to recommend is Quantient, a groundbreaking initiative that combines quantum technology with the DeSci ecosystem. With a low market cap under ($100K), The project is solid and captivating, and with a market cap under $100k, it holds a 300-1000x potential with just a small push. Twitter: https://x.com/Quantient_ This project aims…
❤4
Signed Musuri
ini Dev nya, cek2 aja dulu https://www.linkedin.com/in/tuncay-akbudak-a90509224?utm_source=share&utm_campaign=share_via&utm_content=profile&utm_medium=android_app https://x.com/blambuer10?t=eyhUwKbOtYqFjEHkozKvlA&s=09
Signed Musuri
https://x.com/_kaitoai/status/1867192081392750594?s=46&t=3orp0VBeMLgulpVlFdVNFw
Signed Musuri
MASIH ADA KAH YANG GARAP AIRDROP ATAU PARKIRAN ?
👀5😱1
Signed 0xCB27
Setiap Cycle Crypto selalu menciptakan MILIARDER baru. Namun, mereka semua bukanlah weak hand, melainkan Hodler sejati. Dan kalian tidak butuk banyak, cukup 1-2 Token. Buy and Hold!
🔥3
Signed 0xCB27
Sabar. Memang biasanya dibanting dulu sebelum dibanting lagi 🫵
Signed 0xCB27
🟢 $71,500 @bitcoin_price
Signed 0xCB27
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @TheCodeschannel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@TheCodeschannel named 27 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“TheCodes Announcements” (@TheCodeschannel), 247 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TheCodeschannel.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.