Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Tesfaab Teshome

@Tfanos

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

2,335subscribers

+61 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001173613158
TypeChannel
Username@Tfanos
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Tfanos

Growth

2,2702,3352,302.56 August 2026 — 2,274 subscribers7 August 2026 — 2,271 subscribers10 August 2026 — 2,270 subscribers13 August 2026 — 2,335 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 7 days, net +61. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,260–2,345 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 07:342,335+65
10 Aug 2026, 17:002,270-1
7 Aug 2026, 11:302,271-3
6 Aug 2026, 15:032,274first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 27 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
24.7%
avg views ÷ 2,335 subscribers
Avg views / post
577
10 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.36%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
10
of 18 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 23 July 2026
Posts held18 (27 June 202623 July 2026)
Views total5,765
Reactions total136
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 16:43 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
3m 55s
Average length
1m 58s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

211 reactions across 18 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
7435.1%
👍5124.2%
😢219.95%
😁199.00%
👎188.53%
👏157.11%
🔥62.84%
🥰62.84%
🤔10.474%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 211reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 27 June 2026 to 23 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

23 Jul 2026, 14:35 UTC444 views14 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

ለቅዳሜ ምሽት ቀጠሮ እንያዝ... በርዕዮት ኪን ልዩ ፕሮግራም ተዘጋጅቷል። አራት መጽሐፍትን በኢንተርኔት እንመርቃለንተ ህይወት ተፈራ ፥ ይፍቱስራ ምትኩ ፥ አድህኖም ምትኩ እና እኔ አለን። ደጋሹ Tewodros Tsegaye ነው። ቴዲና የርዕዮት ቡድን ስለ ሚያዘጋጀው ድግስ ማብራሪያ ያስፈልግ ይሆን? ጥሩ ድግስ እንደሚሆን ሁላችንም እናውቃለን። ቅዳሜ ሐምሌ 18 ከምሽቱ 12 ፡30 ጀምሮ እንገናኛለን!

10👍2🔥2

22 Jul 2026, 15:56 UTC476 views25 reactionsread 7 August 2026

ቀጣይ አመት ምግብ ይኖረን ይሆን? አይርበንም ይሆን? እንጃ ብቻ ዛሬ ጠዋት ከቤት ስወጣ ወደ ሰማይ አንጋጠጥኩ። ይህ ሰሞንኛ ልማዴ ነው። በየጠዋቱ ሰማዩን አየዋለሁ። "ዛሬ ይዘንብ ይሆን?" እላለሁ። ድንገት የገበሬ አመል አመጣሁ። መዝነብ አለመዝነቡ የሚያስጨንቀው ሰው ሆንኩ። ልጅ እያለሁ ፥ ቤተሰቦቼ ከዘመድ አዝማድ የሚያደርጉት ውይይት ላይ የማይረሳ ጥያቄ ነበር። "እናንተጋ ይዘንባል?" ይባባላሉ። "እናንተጋ ይዘንባል ወይ?" የሚለው ጥያቄ አይቀሬ ጥያቄ ነው። ከልጅነት ከፍ ባልኩበት እድሜ የጥያቄው ዋጋ አይገባኝም ነበር። ሰዎች ወሬ ለማስቀጠል ብቻ የሚወራወሩት ጥያቄ ይመስለኝ ነበር። "ይዘንባል ወይ?" የሚለው ጥያቄ ግዙፍ ነው። ጥያቄው ስለዘንድሮ ቢ

👍11😢9🥰32

20 Jul 2026, 14:12 UTC533 views14 reactionsread 7 August 2026

ትውልድ አይደናገር ፥ እኛም እንናገር እግር ኳስ ቅሪላ ማልፋት ብቻ አይደለም። የጠገበ ፈረንጅ እርግጫም አይደለም። እግር ኳስ የብዙ ነገሮች ድምር ውጤት ነው። የግለሰቦች ተሰጥኦ ፥ የቡድን ስራ ፥ የአመራር ጥበብ ፥ ስነልቦናዊ ጥንካሬ ፥ የአእምሮ ፍጥነት ፥ የአካል ብቃት ፥ አልሸነፍ ባይነት... ወዘተ ተጣምሮ እግር ኳስን ይፈጥራሉ። ከላይ ከተጠቀሱት ያለ አንዱ ዘመናዊ እግር ኳስ የለም። እግርኳስ እንደ ቡድን ከፍታው ላይ ሲደርስ የጋርዲዮላን ባርሴሎና ይመስላል። እንደ ግሰለሰብ የእግር ኳስ ከፍታ ልዮ ሜሲ ነው። ሊዮኔል ሜሲ ፥ የማይገረሰስ ንጉሥ! ለመጀመሪያ ጊዜ ሜሲን ያየሁት የዛሬ 21 አመት ነበር። እንደሁልጊዜው ከአባቴጋ ኳስ ልናይ ሄደን

6👍5👏2🥰1

20 Jul 2026, 13:53 UTC434 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

ዛሬ አትሮኖስ ነበርን። ስለ መጽሐፌ "ዙፋን ልፊያ" አወራን። ጥሩ ውይይት ነበረን። በበጎ አስተያየቶች ልቤ ሞቋል፥ እንዲታረም በተነገሩኝ ነጥቦች ተምሬበታለሁ። እንኳን ተወያየን ፎቶ ፥ ዶክተር ፍርድአወቀ ማሞ (የቀይ ባርህ ሲቀላ መጽሐፍ ደራሲ) ፣ አርቲስት ዘላለም ምፅላል (ሱዳን ምንልታዘዝ ድራማ ላይ)፣ ሊዲያ ተስፋዬ (ደራሲ) ፣ ተስፋዬ አድሃኖም (Phd የነገረመለኮት እና የቋንቋ መምህር) እና ተስፋአብ ተሾመ

5👍1

15 Jul 2026, 21:12 UTC760 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026

"የሜሲ ቡድን ተሸነፈ" ብለው ተስፋ ካደረጉ በኋላ አርጀንቲና ማሸነፏ ያረካል። ተስፋቸው ገደል ሲገባ ደስ ይላል። መጀመሪያ የፖርቱጋል ደጋፊ ነበሩ፥ ቀጥለው ፈረንሳይ ፥ ቀጥለው እንግሊዝ... ሜሲን ሊያስቆም ይችላል ብለው ያሰቡትን ሁሉ ደግፈዋል። የሜሲ እግሮች ተስፋቸውን ደጋግሞ ቀምቷል። እየመሩ ተስፋ አድርገው ሲሸነፉ ደስ ይለኛል (በነገራችን ላይ ሜሲ የምንፈልገውን ሁሉ ሰጥቶን ጨርሷል። በዚህ አለም ዋንጫ ሜሲን በመጥላት የነሆለሉ በስኬቱ ሲበሽቁ ማየቱ ነው የሚያስደስተኝ

5👎3🔥3👏1

15 Jul 2026, 17:44 UTC680 views26 reactionsread 7 August 2026

አርጀንቲና በኢ-ፍትሐዊ መንገድ ብታሸንፍ ደስ ይለኛል። ኦፍ ሳይድ ጎል አግብተው ቢፀድቅ ፥ የማያሰጥ ፔናሊቲ ተሰጥቷቸው ቢያገቡ ፥ እንግሊዝ ንፁህ ጎል ቢሻርባት ደስ ይለኛል። ለምን? ሜሲን የሚጠሉ ሰዎች በደንብ መናደድ አለባቸው። ጨጓራቸው ሲላጥ ማየት እፈልጋለሁ!

👎147👏4🤔1

15 Jul 2026, 15:00 UTC676 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026

ጡቴ መውረድ የጀመረ ይመስለኛል። መቀመጫዬ እንደ ድሮው እንዳልሆነ ይታወቀኛል። ጉንጮቼ ማዲያት ማውጣት ጀምረዋል። ከናፍሮቼን ሲጃራ አጥቁሯቸዋል። እያረጀው ይሆን? የከፋ ቀን ይመጣል። በተፈጥሮዬ ውብ የነበርኩበት ቀን አልፎ በሜካፕ ጉልበት እንኳን ማማር የማልችልበት ቀን ይመጣል። . . . አረጃለሁ። መክሰም አልፈልግም። በፍጹም መክሰም አልፈልግም። ተወልጄ ሳልጨርስ መሞት አልፈልግም። ኑሮዬን ሳላጣጥም ዘመኔ እንዲያከትም አልሻም። በህይወቴ ዛሬ የሚባል ቀን ኖሮኝ አያውቅም። የሆነ ወቅት ላይ ስለ ነገ ሳስብ ዛሬዬ አመለጠኝ። ትላንት ያለ ልክ በተስፋ እና ህልም ውስጥ ገብቼ የአሁን ሃያልነት ተረሳኝ። ነገ ያልኩት ቀን ሲደርስ ደግሞ ተስፋ ካደረግናቸው ህል

7👍2😢2

11 Jul 2026, 16:06 UTC757 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026

"እናቴ ሦስቴ አግብታ ሦስቴ ፈታለች። ከእህቴ እና ከወንድሜ ጋር አባት እንደማንጋራ ታውቂያለሽ። እናቴ አዲስ ሕይወት በጀመረች ቁጥር በትዳሯ እንደምትፀና የምትወራረድ ቢሆንም፣ አዲሱ ሕይወት ብዙም ሳይቆይ መዝመም ይጀምርና የመጠገን እድልን ሳያገኝ ይፈርሳል።ይህ እንዴት ሆነ?›› ‹‹እርግማን ላይሆን ይችላል›› ‹‹ወንድሜ ለትዳር ምንም አይነት መጓጓት እንዳልነበረው ታውቂያለሽ... እማማና ዘመዶቿ ወትውተውት ካገባ በኋላ በሦስት ዓመቱ ተፋታ። ከትዳሩ መፍረስ በኋላ ለገዛ ልጁ እንኳን ግድ የለሽ ሆኖ የተገለለ ኑሮ እየገፋ እንደሆነ ታውቂያለሽ።... ይህ እርግማን አይደለም?›› ‹‹እርግማን ላይሆን ይችላል›› ‹‹እህቴ ቁጥብ እና በራስ መተማመን ያላት ሴት

👍73

9 Jul 2026, 14:43 UTC841 views17 reactionsread 7 August 2026

ጡቴና ዳሌዬን ወደ ገንዘብ ለመመንዘር ተሰለፍኩ። ውበቴን ሸጬ ገንዘብ ለመቀበል ወደ ገበያ ወጣሁ። በገበያ መካከል እርቃኔን ቆምኩ። "ይሄን የመሰለ ውበት ኖሮሽ እንዴት ትቸገሪያለሽ?" አሉኝ። ቆንጆ ሴት ችጋር ሊያገኛት አይገባም ሲሉኝ አመንኳቸው። ውበት እና መከራ ደመኛ እንደሆኑ ሰበኩኝ፥ ስብከታቸው በዝግታ ወደ ልቤ ሰረገ። መሰረታዊ ፍላጎቴ የተሟላ ነበር። መኪና ባይኖረኝም የታክሲ ተቸግሬ አላውቅም። ምግብ ባላማርጥም አልራብም። ቤት ባይኖረኝም የቤት ኪራይ መክፈል አይቸግረኝም። በባንክ የምቆጥበው ባይተርፈኝም እዳ ገብቼ አላውቅም። በፍስሃ ክንዶች ባልንተራስም ሃዘን አይደቁሰኝም። ችጋር እንደሚደቁሰኝ የነገሩኝ ሌሎች ናቸው። ውበቴን ባዳነቁ አፍታ "አንቺን

👏8👍32🥰2🔥1😢1

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @Tfanos. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 150,786 of 1,183,361entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Tesfaab Teshome” (@Tfanos), 2,335 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Tfanos.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.