Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

مُدَوّنَةُ طَالِبٍ فِي الحَوزةِ

@Talib_blog

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

139subscribers

+2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002204948527
TypeChannel
Username@Talib_blog
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Talib_blog

Growth

1371391387 August 2026 — 137 subscribers8 August 2026 — 137 subscribers14 August 2026 — 139 subscribers7 August 202614 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 7 days, net +2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 137–139 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 08:05139+2
8 Aug 2026, 23:15137no change
7 Aug 2026, 07:01137first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 15 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
95.2%
avg views ÷ 139 subscribers
Avg views / post
132
18 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
18
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 July 2026
Posts held19 (15 July 202622 July 2026)
Views total2,383
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 23:15 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Recent posts

22 Jul 2026, 06:02 UTC58 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @zenjani_fawaed

📌 التصحیف في سند روایة #عمر_بن_حنظلة 🔻مُحَمَّدُ بْنُ يَحْيَى عَنْ ⬅️محَمَّدِ بْنِ الْحُسَيْنِ➡️ عنْ مُحَمَّدِ بْنِ عِيسَى عَنْ صَفْوَانَ بْنِ يَحْيَى عَنْ دَاوُدَ بْنِ الْحُصَيْنِ عَنْ عُمَرَ بْنِ حَنْظَلَةَ ...(1) ✅كتب السيد البروجردي حاشية تعليقا على محمد بن الحسين والتي نقبلها أيضا، فقال: «الغالب علی الظن انّه محمّد بن الحسن و هو الصفّار و صحّفه قلم النسّاخ». 💠 والذي يظهر أن كلام السيد البروجردي صحيح وأن هناك ت

21 Jul 2026, 20:34 UTC62 viewsread 8 August 2026

الرواية مفصّلة جدّاً، يمكنكم قراءتها على هذه المنصة، ولا أعلم حقيقةً هوية أصحابها ولكنهم يقومون بعمل رائع في نسخ الأحاديث ومطابقتها. الرواية : https://mail.almerja.com/more.php?idm=123140

21 Jul 2026, 20:21 UTC59 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @zenjani_fawaed

🔰أهمية علوم اللغة🔰 ● في بعض الأحيان، بسبب عدم الانتباه إلى بعض الدقائق الأدبية، تحدث الغفلة في الاستدلال بآية أو رواية معينة. ● رأيت في كلام أحد العلماء أنه استدل على وجوب معرفة النبي ومعرفة الأحكام بالآية الشريفة: «وَمَا خَلَقْتُ الْجِنَّ وَالْإِنسَ إِلَّا لِيَعْبُدُونِ». ● يبدو أن استدلاله هو أن "ليعبدون" مفعوله محذوف، والظاهر أن حذف المفعول عام. ومن جهة أخرى، مع الأخذ بعين الاعتبار الرواية -على فرض وجودها- التي

21 Jul 2026, 20:19 UTC55 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @zenjani_fawaed

💠 وحدة النقل والناقل، دليل بطلان المنقول ❖ آية الله العظمى السيد شبيري الزنجاني حفظه الله: ● في رواية مفصّلة جداً من احتجاج الطبرسي، جاء أن أحد الزنادقة عرض على الإمام أمير المؤمنين عليه السلام أنه يوجد تناقضات في القرآن؛ وإذا حللت هذه التناقضات، سأصبح مسلماً. من بين شبهاته كان السؤال عن العلاقة بين صدر وذيل الآية 3 من سورة النساء، وهو ما العلاقة بين موضوع اليتامى والنكاح بالنساء. فأجاب الإمام: «فهو مما قدّمت ذكره

20 Jul 2026, 13:01 UTC66 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

كـَلَّآ إِنَّهُمۡ عَن رَّبِّهِمۡ يَوۡمَئِذٖ لَّمَحۡجُوبُونَ

20 Jul 2026, 08:03 UTC183 viewsread 8 August 2026

أكبـرُ الكبائر : عَنْ عَبْدِ اللَّهِ بْنِ سِنَانٍ قَالَ: سَمِعْتُ أَبَا عَبْدِ اللَّهِ (عليه السلام) يَقُولُ: إِنَّ مِنَ الْكَبَائِرِ عُقُوقَ الْوَالِدَيْنِ وَالْيَأْسَ مِنْ رَوْحِ اللَّهِ وَالْأَمْنَ لِمَكْرِ اللَّهِ، وَقَدْ رُوِيَ أَنَّ أَكْبَرَ الْكَبَائِرِ الشَّرْكُ بِاللَّهِ. — الكافي | الشيخ محمـد بن يعقـوب الكلينيّ (رض)

19 Jul 2026, 15:16 UTC906 viewsread 8 August 2026

الآثار التكوينيّة للذنـوب : عَنِ الْفُضَيْلِ بْنِ يَسَارٍ عَنْ أَبِي جَعْفَرٍ (عليه السلام) قَالَ: إِنَّ الْعَبْدَ لَيُذْنِبُ الذَّنْبَ فَيُزْوَى‏ عَنْهُ الرِّزْقُ. عَنْ سَمَاعَةَ قَالَ : سَمِعْتُ أَبَا عَبْدِ اللَّهِ (عليه السلام) يَقُولُ‏: مَا أَنْعَمَ اللَّهُ عَلَى عَبْدٍ نِعْمَةً فَسَلَبَهَا إِيَّاهُ حَتَّى يُذْنِبَ ذَنْباً يَسْتَحِقُّ بِذَلِكَ السَّلْبَ. — الكافي | الشيخ محمـد بن يعقـوب الكلينيّ (رض)

17 Jul 2026, 21:01 UTC101 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

جواب الشيخ محمـد بن محـمد بن النعمان المفيد (رض) عن عقيـدة البـداء التي يؤمن بها الشِّيعة الإماميّـة [أعلى الله برهانـهم].

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @Talib_blog. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 668,140 of 1,189,255entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“مُدَوّنَةُ طَالِبٍ فِي الحَوزةِ” (@Talib_blog), 139 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Talib_blog.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.