Channel
@Tahghigh_phil
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
371subscribers
-3 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002399149930 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Tahghigh_phil |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 3 times, most recently 11 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Tahghigh_phil |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 22 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 52% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 26 Aug 2026, 18:52 | 371 | -1 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 18:37 | 372 | -1 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 18:14 | 373 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 20:33 | 374 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 06:06 | 374 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 16 September 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 27 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
113 reactions across 12 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 85.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 96 | 85.0% | |
| 👍 | 11 | 9.73% | |
| 🔥 | 3 | 2.65% | |
| 👎 | 2 | 1.77% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 0.885% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 113 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 16 September 2025 to 27 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
📣مخاطبان و خوانندگان محترم نشریهی تحقیقات فلسفی سلام؛ 🔸پس از وقفهای چندماهه و تأخیر در انتشار یک فصل، روز پنجشنبه با وجود تمام کمبودها و مشکلات، شماره پنجم نشریه تحقیقات فلسفی منتشر شد. پس از انتشار، افراد مختلف و دلسوزی که نشریه را دنبال میکنند، ما را از وجود کاستیها و برخی ایرادات گوناگون در آن مطلع کردند. ما نیز ایراداتی را که امکان رفع سریع آنها وجود داشت، فوراً برطرف کردیم؛ اما تعدادی از ایرادات را به دلیل…
❤6👏1
نشریهٔ تحقیقات فلسفی pinned a file
🔹شماره پنجمِ فصلنامه علمی-تخصصی «تحقیقات فلسفی» ( بهار ۱۴۰۵) ◾️مدیر مسئول و سردبیر: علی خاوری ◾️دبیر اندیشه فلسفی: الهام نبیئی ◾️دبیر تاریخ فلسفه: امیر بیابانگرد ◾️دبیر ترجمه فلسفی: زهرا حیدری پور 🔻«پرواز جغد مینروا!» 🔲در این ویژه نامه میخوانیم : 🔘مروری کوتاه بر تاریخ ایدهآلیسم آلمانی؛ ✍️امیر بیابانگرد 🔘 اگزیستانسیالیسم هگل؛ ✍️موریس مرلو-پونتی/مترجم: معین رمضانی 🔘هیچ ایدئالیسمی بدون افلاطون گرایی…
❤16🔥1
📣 به دلیل برخی مشکلات فنّی پیش آمده، شماره پنجم با کمی تأخیر منتشر خواهد شد. از تمام دنبال کنندگان و خوانندگان عزیز بابت این اتفاق عذرخواه هستیم. 🔸نشریهٔ تحقیقات فلسفی 🌐 @Tahghigh_phil
❤9
🔻هگل: «جغد مینروا تنها با فرارسیدن دوشیزه شب، پرواز خود را آغاز میکند.» «پرواز جغد مینروا» ⏳به زودی... 🌐 @Tahghigh_phil
❤9
🤏⌛
⭕شمارش معکوس برای انتشارِ پنجمین شماره از نشریهٔ علمی-تخصصی «تحقیقات فلسفی». «پرواز جغد مینروا...» @Tahghigh_phil
❤8🔥2
نشریهٔ تحقیقات فلسفی pinned an audio file
📌سرویس «شنیدار فلسفی» نشریه علمی تخصصی تحقیقات فلسفی تقدیم میکند: 🔸فیلوس؛ قسمت چهارم: علوم شناختی؟ 🔹مدخل علوم شناختی از دانشنامه استنفورد 👤دبیر علمی: مبین کریمی 📌در این شماره بررسی میکنیم: 🔸۱. علوم شناختی شامل چه رشتههای علمی برای مطالعه بینرشتهای ذهن و هوش میشود؟ 🔹۲. فرضیه مرکزی علوم شناختی، تفکر را بر پایه کدام ساختارهای بازنمایی و رویههای محاسباتی تبیین میکند؟ 🔸۳. چرا دیدگاه رفتارگرایی د…
❤4
🔸یکسال گذشت... 🔹دقیقا یکسال پیش، نشریه علمی-تخصصی تحقیقات فلسفی، با مجوز معاونت فرهنگی دانشگاه تهران، به عنوانِ نخستین «نشریه مستقل» دانشجویی، آغاز به کار کرد. 🔸حالا بعد از یکسال، با انتشار چهار شماره از این نشریه، توانستیم در دانشگاه تهران و با همکاریِ دیگر دانشگاههای ایران، نشریهای مطلوب را به زیورِ طبع بیآرایم. امیدواریم در آغازِ سال دوم، با قوّت بیشتری به کار خود ادامه بدهیم، و رضایت مخاطبان را بیش از پی…
❤10👍2👎1
🔹شماره چهارمِ ️فصلنامه علمی-تخصصی «تحقیقات فلسفی» ( پائیز ۱۴۰۴) ◾️مدیر مسئول و سردبیر: علی خاوری 🔻دکارت: «من، میاندیشم!» 🔲در این ویژه نامه میخوانیم : 🔘مسئله دکارت در پرتو زایش مدرنیته؛ ✍️محمد رضا شاهحسینی/امیر بیابانگرد 🔘 شک دکارتی: از تردید مطلق تا ابزار عقلانی در تحلیل معرفت؛ ✍️فاطمه امینی پویا 🔘از کوگیتو تا سوژه؛ ✍️مرضیه پزشگیان 🔘مواجه ویتگنشتاین با شک روشی دکارت؛ ✍️هادی رنجبر 🔘نسبت بداهت و …
❤9👍2
🔻دکارت: «من، میاندیشم!» ⏳به زودی... 🌐 @Tahghigh_phil
❤9👍2
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Tahghigh_phil. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“نشریهٔ تحقیقات فلسفی” (@Tahghigh_phil), 371 subscribers as measured 26 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Tahghigh_phil.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.