Ecommerce storefront — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 81% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Content that also appears on other registered channels
Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
Matching posts — open both and compare (2 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 0 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 21 comparable posts for this entry, running 5 August 2026 to 7 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).
Across the whole group of 2, the earliest publisher we hold is @TLBl1 — which is this entry. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the key clone_source, last confirmed 8 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Also posting the same content
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
6 measurements spanning 4 days, net +4,799. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 495,707–501,946 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Aug 2026, 00:12
501,226
+1,149
10 Aug 2026, 23:14
500,077
+2,058
9 Aug 2026, 20:21
498,019
+943
8 Aug 2026, 18:02
497,076
+456
7 Aug 2026, 15:10
496,620
+193
7 Aug 2026, 12:48
496,427
first reading
Engagement
55 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 18 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
1.36%
avg views ÷ 501,226 subscribers
Avg views / post
6,800
55 posts measured
Reaction rate
0%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
55
of 55 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 3 of 55 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held
55 (5 August 2026 – 12 August 2026)
Views total
373,954
Reactions total
0
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
12 Aug 2026, 17:38 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈513
Videos
≈57
Links
≈1,860
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 55 we hold a reading for · 4%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @TLBl1. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 55 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 August 2026 to 12 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
• تم اضافة قسم جديد ( مميزين تلجرام ⭐) القسم مخصص للخدمات المميزة فقط يعني جميع الخدمات مشتركيها مفعلين تلجرام مميز، يوجد داخل القسم مشتركين مميزين للقنوات والمجموعات، وايضًا خدمات مشتركين بوتات مميزين، وتعزيز ومشاهدات مميزين، بأرخص الأسعار استمتعوا جميعًا بأفضل الخدمات للبحث وزيادة النشاط 🤝
• اضغط هنا لشحن 50 الف نقطة بـ 5$ مع هدية اضافيه لكل عملية شحن 🎁
@FAABOT 😂 البوت
• تم اضافة خدمة جديدة : 🎁حفظ 🔰 فيديو تيك توك VIPحقيقي مجانا🎁
السعر 0 نقطة لكل 1000 حفظ ⚡️
الخدمة سريعة جداً ومجاناً تماماً 👍
• اضغط هنا لشحن 50 الف نقطة بـ 5$ مع هدية اضافيه لكل عملية شحن 🎁
@FAABOT 😂 البوت
تم اكتمال مليون طلـب خلال 40 يوم فقط ومستمرين للأفضل ان شاء الله 👀
بوت طلباتي الاول والأفضل دائمًا 🤝
• اضغط هنا لشحن 50 الف نقطة بـ 5$ مع هدية اضافيه لكل عملية شحن 👍
• @FAABOT 😂
تم اضافة خدمة جديدة : متابعين👤صفحة - حساب فيس بوك حقيقي الأرخص ثابت 2M🚀
السعر 5 الف نقطة لكل 1000 متابع ⚡️
الارخص بالعالم بدء فوري سريع جودة عالية ثابت حسابات حقيقية 2M استمتعوا جميعًا 🤩
• اضغط هنا لشحن 50 الف نقطة بـ 5$ مع هدية اضافيه لكل عملية شحن 🎁
@FAABOT 😂 البوت
يمكنك شحن نقاط بوت#طلباتي عبر النجوم من خلال بوت الشحن الفوري بأنساب الأسعار يتم اضافة النقاط تلقائيا وفوريا بعد الدفع مباشر يمكنك الشراء الان : @ENUBOT 💙
اشحن الان وخليك ضمن اول 3 فائزين بجوائز الشحن مليون نقطة مجانا للمصنفين 🥰
‼️ #انتباه
اي شخص يستخدم خدماتنا للتخـريب على حسابات وقنوات الآخرين ينحـظر من البوت مع خصم النقاط وبدون أي تعويض لو نقاطك مليار وتجي تخـرب على الناس وتخالف شروط الاستخدام تنحـظر وتنخصم جميع نقاطك، ملاحضه قبل حظـر الشخص المخـرب اذا كان هناك دليل غير واضح من الشخص الاخر لا يتم حظـر الشخص فقط عند ملاحضه دليل واضح يتم حظـر المخـرب ✔️
نعمل دائمًا لخدمة مستخدمينا 😍
💙 @FAABOT
• تم اضافة خدمة جديدة : مشتركين👤تلجرام MX (ضمان 90 يوم) الأرخص✅
السعر 4 الف نقطة لكل 1000 مشترك ⚡️
الأرخص بالعالم حسابات قديمة غير المحذوفين ضمان 100٪ اقرى وصف الخدمة قبل الطلب ✔️
• اضغط هنا لشحن 50 الف نقطة بـ 5$ مع هدية اضافيه لكل عملية شحن 🎁
@FAABOT 💙البوت
لكل 12k مشترك = 5$ فقط 😏
• تم اضافة خدمة جديدة : مشاهدات👀قصة انستغرام لجميع القصص 200k حقيقي🚀
السعر 2 الف نقطة لكل 1000 مشاهدة ⚡️
الخدمة الأفضل بالعالم بدء فوري سريع جدًا مع مشاهدة جميع القصص اليومية جودة حقيقي 100٪ 🍸
• اضغط هنا لشحن 50 الف نقطة بـ 5$ مع هدية اضافيه لكل عملية شحن 🎁
@FAABOT 😂 البوت
• تم اضافة خدمة جديدة :تعليقات (إيجابي)💬 ريلز - بوست انستغرام ثابت رخيص🐳
السعر 9 الف نقطة لكل 1000 تعليق ⚡️
بدء فوري سريع الارخص بالعالم جودة حقيقية تعليقات إيجابي عشوائي مدى الحياة مع هدية اضافيه لكل طلب🤩
• اضغط هنا لشحن 50 الف نقطة بـ 5$ مع هدية اضافيه لكل عملية شحن 🎁
@FAABOT 😂 البوت
#ملاحضه الخدمة تعمل على الريلز والبوست ✔️
🔹اسعار نقاط بوت طلباتي الجديدة 🔥"
يمكنك شراء نقاط بوت #طلباتي 💙 تلقائيا وفورياً عبر بوت الشحن التلقائي عبر اسياسيل كرت او تحويل❤️🔥الاسعار👇
- $1 = 10000 نقطة 💎 + 🎁
- $2 = 20000 نقطة 💎 + 🎁
- $3 = 30000 نقطة 💎 + 🎁
- $4 = 40000 نقطة 💎 + 🎁
- $5 = 50000 نقطة 💎 + 🎁
- $10 = 100000 نقطة 💎 + 🎁
- $20 = 200000 نقطة 💎 + 🎁
- $50 = 500000 نقطة 💎 + 🎁
- $150 = 1500000 نقطة 💎 + 🎁
• يمكنك شحن حتى 100M نقطة 🤩"
#ملاحضه نقاط 5٪ هدية عند …
Showing the 12 most recent of 55 posts we hold for @TLBl1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 221,156 of 1,084,084entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“تعليمات بوت طلباتي | تحديثات ⚙️” (@TLBl1), 501,226 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TLBl1.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.