Engagement
13 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 0.102%
- avg views ÷ 2,537 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 2.6
- 10 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 13
- of 13 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Recent posts
7 Aug 2026, 23:08 UTC1 viewsread 7 August 2026 🌟 秋辞互推 接纳各种小频道
请不要删除此信息否则取消互推资格
1. 上善若水主频道【资源破解/簧片网】
2. 周防有希频道\[安装包置顶\](https://t.me/ZFYXMODD)
3. 少萝 强奸 学生妹 福利姬 黑丝 白丝 整合
4. AS cheat MOD 🇨🇳 4\.5
5. RKR直装官方频道
6. lhs
7. AI Pulse 日报
8. 王者荣耀小土豆直装
9. 灯枣\_MOD官方主频道🇨🇳
10. 和泉纱雾安装包频道
11. 落叶资源分享\[冲500\](https://t.me/LUOYEZY)
12. 无缘公益项目频道
13. 东南亚文案馆DJ🎧
14. 和泉纱雾 · 主频道
15. 季白数据号直登号
📌 共 65 个频道加入互推
📄 第 1/5 页
Signed QCHTBOT
7 Aug 2026, 19:00 UTC4 viewsread 7 August 2026 File
😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁实力赌场官方直营,大额无忧,首充签到领100%!
😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀9G.COM首周100%包赢
😀😀😀😀😀7T.COM全球最稳的USDT娱乐城
#音乐频道 #DJ舞曲 #视频素材馆
关注不迷路: 👉 @TINGYUDJ
7 Aug 2026, 18:59 UTC3 viewsread 7 August 2026 File
😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁实力赌场官方直营,大额无忧,首充签到领100%!
😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀9G.COM首周100%包赢
😀😀😀😀😀7T.COM全球最稳的USDT娱乐城
#音乐频道 #DJ舞曲 #视频素材馆
关注不迷路: 👉 @TINGYUDJ
7 Aug 2026, 18:59 UTC3 viewsread 7 August 2026 File
😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁实力赌场官方直营,大额无忧,首充签到领100%!
😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀9G.COM首周100%包赢
😀😀😀😀😀7T.COM全球最稳的USDT娱乐城
#音乐频道 #DJ舞曲 #视频素材馆
关注不迷路: 👉 @TINGYUDJ
7 Aug 2026, 18:59 UTC2 viewsread 7 August 2026 File
😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁实力赌场官方直营,大额无忧,首充签到领100%!
😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀9G.COM首周100%包赢
😀😀😀😀😀7T.COM全球最稳的USDT娱乐城
#音乐频道 #DJ舞曲 #视频素材馆
关注不迷路: 👉 @TINGYUDJ
7 Aug 2026, 18:58 UTC2 viewsread 7 August 2026 File
😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁实力赌场官方直营,大额无忧,首充签到领100%!
😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀9G.COM首周100%包赢
😀😀😀😀😀7T.COM全球最稳的USDT娱乐城
#音乐频道 #DJ舞曲 #视频素材馆
关注不迷路: 👉 @TINGYUDJ
7 Aug 2026, 18:58 UTC2 viewsread 7 August 2026 File
😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁实力赌场官方直营,大额无忧,首充签到领100%!
😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀9G.COM首周100%包赢
😀😀😀😀😀7T.COM全球最稳的USDT娱乐城
#音乐频道 #DJ舞曲 #视频素材馆
关注不迷路: 👉 @TINGYUDJ
7 Aug 2026, 18:57 UTC3 viewsread 7 August 2026 File
😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁实力赌场官方直营,大额无忧,首充签到领100%!
😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀9G.COM首周100%包赢
😀😀😀😀😀7T.COM全球最稳的USDT娱乐城
#音乐频道 #DJ舞曲 #视频素材馆
关注不迷路: 👉 @TINGYUDJ
7 Aug 2026, 18:56 UTC3 viewsread 7 August 2026 File
😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁实力赌场官方直营,大额无忧,首充签到领100%!
😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀9G.COM首周100%包赢
😀😀😀😀😀7T.COM全球最稳的USDT娱乐城
#音乐频道 #DJ舞曲 #视频素材馆
关注不迷路: 👉 @TINGYUDJ
7 Aug 2026, 18:55 UTC3 viewsread 7 August 2026 File
😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁实力赌场官方直营,大额无忧,首充签到领100%!
😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀9G.COM首周100%包赢
😀😀😀😀😀7T.COM全球最稳的USDT娱乐城
#音乐频道 #DJ舞曲 #视频素材馆
关注不迷路: 👉 @TINGYUDJ
Channel name was changed to «东南亚DJ»
Channel name was changed to «i»
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @TINGYUDJ. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 473,137 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 17 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 3
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 3
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 0
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@TINGYUDJ named 3 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Evidenced gone
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
@dznb_mod
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026 · confirmed gone 9 August 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced @hequanshawu6
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026 · confirmed gone 8 August 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced @qezyfx_xo
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026 · confirmed gone 11 August 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“东南亚文案馆DJ🎧” (@TINGYUDJ), 2,537 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TINGYUDJ.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.