Channel
@MoseDust
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
7,147subscribers
-49 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002340793183 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Usernames | @MoseDust @qcnb991 |
| Description | 频道主 |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 29 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 13 |
| On Telegram | t.me/MoseDust |
Gaming — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 29 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 95% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 29 Sept 2026, 04:22 | 7,147 | +7,146 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 03:35 | 1 | -6,950 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 21:42 | 6,951 | -26 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 19:05 | 6,977 | -14 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 02:23 | 6,991 | -23 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 13:03 | 7,014 | -25 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 20:48 | 7,039 | -38 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 19:54 | 7,077 | -45 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 09:44 | 7,122 | -4 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 15:07 | 7,126 | -42 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 20:31 | 7,168 | -15 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 04:04 | 7,183 | -13 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 11:46 | 7,196 | first reading |
81 posts held, back to 15 July 2026 — the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 16 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 81 (15 July 2026 – 28 September 2026) |
| Views total | 2,020 |
| Reactions total | 29 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 29 Sept 2026, 04:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 29 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
209 reactions across 72 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 68.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 143 | 68.4% | |
| ❤ | 36 | 17.2% | |
| 😭 | 13 | 6.22% | |
| 😱 | 7 | 3.35% | |
| 🥰 | 5 | 2.39% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 0.957% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 0.478% | |
| 😈 | 1 | 0.478% | |
| 😘 | 1 | 0.478% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 72 of the 81 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 209 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 81 most recent posts we hold, published 15 July 2026 to 28 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🇨🇳适配1.38.12和平精英 ⭐️稳定大号推荐使用上分模式 👑大号裸奔无禁令 🤘可以搭配MoseDust端口 🌟范围配置路径:你执行的目录里 👋请确保您的设备无异常再进行游玩 😙本项目公益不收费👍 ✌一号网盘点我 点我进行反馈 😇🙃😉https://t.me/MoseCheatNB 😇🙃😉https://t.me/MoseCheatNB 😇🙃😉https://t.me/MoseCheatNB
👍2
落雾内部v19+MD私端反馈稳定奔放
👍5😭1
落雾内部v19+MD私端反馈稳定奔放
👍1
落雾内部v18+MD私端反馈稳定奔放
👍2
😀😀😀自愿下单链接 https://shop.yynb886.cn/shop/MoseCheatNB 安装包点我 当代理点我 教程 点我白嫖卡密 落雾文件官方卡网 反馈可以找客服加时 😀😀😀😀😀😀@luowu_nb
👍3😘1
😀😀😀自愿下单链接 https://shop.yynb886.cn/shop/MoseCheatNB 安装包点我 当代理点我 教程 点我白嫖卡密 落雾文件官方卡网 反馈可以找客服加时 😀😀😀😀😀😀@luowu_nb
👍3👏2🔥1😈1
落雾内部v18+MD私端反馈稳定奔放
👍4
落雾内部v18+MD私端反馈稳定奔放
👍3
庆祝频道人数7k 给大家发一个红包
❤2👍1
Signed 实名 八弟
💰 转账给你 23.89 U 请在24小时内领取
❤2👍1
Signed 实名 八弟
🐶15岁少罗在别墅被7位金主爸爸內社到sao穴 论奸再一个个粗壮的肉棒的蹂躏下小穴被干的通红 曾多次高潮尿失禁 避孕套都用光了几盒视频
👍4
Signed 实名 八弟
15岁女初种生 被4人论奸👀👀 初高🍡呦🍡呦、小罗莉🔞 楚女膜被破 点击我观看视频‼️‼️
👍3
Signed 实名 八弟
Showing the 12 most recent of 81 posts we hold for @MoseDust. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
你们玩什么游戏
The shares total 110%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 81 most recent posts we hold, published 15 July 2026 to 28 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 16 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@MoseDust named 5 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“忆桉改文件【MoseDust端口】” (@MoseDust), 7,147 subscribers as measured 29 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/MoseDust.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.