File, posted without a caption
👎3❤1

Channel
@TGvpnjichang
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
5,931subscribers
+41 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003639902024 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @TGvpnjichang |
| Created | Between 1 December 2025 and 31 May 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/TGvpnjichang |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 06:55 | 5,931 | +21 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 14:21 | 5,910 | +14 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 08:06 | 5,896 | +6 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 21:16 | 5,890 | first reading |
12 posts held, back to 23 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 9 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 21 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 12 (23 June 2026 – 21 July 2026) |
| Views total | 3,880 |
| Reactions total | 4 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 03:44 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
83 reactions across 9 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 61.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 51 | 61.4% | |
| 💩 | 29 | 34.9% | |
| 👎 | 3 | 3.61% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 83reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 23 June 2026 to 21 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
File, posted without a caption
👎3❤1
一批白嫖,速度还可以的VPN
❤31💩29
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5RFQjt84-Cw
❤2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xHHJb2B2mXo&t=2s
❤1
苹果手机使用Shadowrocket,Stash,Quantumult X教程(iPhone/iPad) 第一步:准备外区 Apple ID 由于部分网络工具在中国区 App Store 无法下载,需要使用海外 Apple ID。 注意事项: ✅ 只需要登录 App Store ❌ 不要登录 iCloud(避免同步照片、通讯录等数据) 操作步骤: 打开手机【设置】 点击顶部【Apple账户】 点击【媒体与购买项目】 点击【退出登录】 再次点击【媒体与购买项目】 登录提供的外区 Apple ID 账号: 账号:xxxxx 密码:xxxxx (这里替换成你的账号) 第二步:下载客户端 打开 App Store 搜索: 方案一:Shadowrocket(推荐) 搜索: Shadowrocket 特点: ✅ 稳定 ✅ 使用简单 ✅ 节点兼容性高 方案二:Stash 搜索: Stash 特点: ✅ 规则功…
❤8
#频道推荐 #互推 ● AI绘画|AI视频 | AI音乐 ● VPN-APP机场大全 ● 可可分享社_破解软件/公益机场VPN ● QQ资源岛-破解软件分享 ● 财新 财新周刊 合租 分享频道 ● 夸克百度UC迅雷网盘资源分享 参加互推: @pindaohutui123bot
❤3
一个非常典型的机场VPN推荐与评测网站。 获取地址➡️ jichangvpn.cloud
❤1
趣连VPN:永不限速,随时随地连接,稳定高速。新用户注册即可领取1天VIP体验权益。 高速连接 全球部署5000+服务器,采用最新协议,提供稳定高速的网络体验。 全球节点 覆盖90+国家和地区的服务器节点,轻松访问全球内容。 隐私保护 银行级AES-256加密,严格无日志政策,保护你的网络隐私安全。 获取链接➡️ https://ad.zestlink.com/agent/D5B4ADBA46
❤3
https://hardcoreq.com/8.%20%E5%86%85%E7%BD%91%E7%BA%BF%E8%B7%AF/
❤1
https://hardcoreq.com/7.%20%E6%95%8F%E6%84%9F%E6%9C%9F%E7%9A%84%E5%BA%94%E5%AF%B9%E6%96%B9%E6%B3%95/
https://hardcoreq.com/6.%20%E7%BF%BB%E5%A2%99%E5%AE%89%E5%85%A8%E9%97%AE%E9%A2%98/
https://hardcoreq.com/5.%20%E5%8D%8F%E8%AE%AE%E5%88%86%E6%9E%90/
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @TGvpnjichang. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 136,947 of 1,481,243entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“VPN-APP机场大全” (@TGvpnjichang), 5,931 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TGvpnjichang.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.