TG万能搜👉 @sousqun 友情频道👉 @TGvpnjichang
❤3😍1

Channel
@aa_apk
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
82,115subscribers
-536 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002275302714 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @aa_apk |
| Description | 绿色软件分享、不定期抽红包,破解VPN,破解老司机APP,游戏下载、电脑技术、安全、纯净、放心、不忘初心只为给你最需要的内容。 合作: @badukeji01 网站: https://badupojie.com/ |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 30 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 23 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 30 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/aa_apk |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Aug 2026, 05:13 | 82,115 | -18 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 02:26 | 82,133 | -14 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 04:12 | 82,147 | -15 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 07:16 | 82,162 | -24 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 06:39 | 82,186 | -16 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 06:08 | 82,202 | -44 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 09:27 | 82,246 | -69 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 19:15 | 82,315 | -41 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 13:05 | 82,356 | -30 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 11:12 | 82,386 | -12 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 12:57 | 82,398 | -21 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 12:34 | 82,419 | -41 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 11:06 | 82,460 | -35 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 18:17 | 82,495 | -19 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 06:07 | 82,514 | -27 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 19:58 | 82,541 | -18 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 18:41 | 82,559 | -23 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 19:45 | 82,582 | -22 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 17:04 | 82,604 | -24 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 19:51 | 82,628 | first reading |
9 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 50 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 23 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 9 (2 August 2026 – 23 August 2026) |
| Views total | 35,740 |
| Reactions total | 45 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 30 Aug 2026, 13:51 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 30 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
45 reactions across 9 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 82.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 37 | 82.2% | |
| 👍 | 4 | 8.89% | |
| 👎 | 2 | 4.44% | |
| 😍 | 2 | 4.44% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 45reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 23 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
TG万能搜👉 @sousqun 友情频道👉 @TGvpnjichang
❤3😍1
建议开飞行模式安装 免费AI机器人➡️@meifeiaibot
❤1😍1
8度网站➡️ baduwangzhan.com
❤10👍1👎1
🌟 星驰VPN:畅享网络,隐私无忧! 🌟 卡顿、限制说再见!星驰VPN带你体验飞速网络与顶级安全! 🌟 为何选择星驰? - 超快速度:全球200+节点,4K视频、游戏零延迟! - 隐私保护:全程加密,零日志,安心隐身。 - 全能兼容:手机、电脑一键畅连,解锁Netflix、YouTube无障碍。 - 免费试用:无限流量,免费适用,24/7客服在线,30秒上手! 🌟 现在加入,畅享无界网络! ⭐️ 免费试用:https://w.xcvpn.com ⭐️ 免费试用:https://w.xcvpn.com ⭐️ 免费试用:https://w.xcvpn.com 🌟 星驰官方客服:@SmallChampion #星驰VPN #网络自由 快来体验,分享好友,一起解锁无限可能!
❤4👍1
一批激情黄油游戏,骚年必备!!
❤1👍1
彩色网站➡️ caisezhan.com 黄油网站➡️ caise999.com
❤2👍1
机场VPN网站➡️ jichangvpn.cloud
❤12👎1
🌟 星驰VPN:畅享网络,隐私无忧! 🌟 卡顿、限制说再见!星驰VPN带你体验飞速网络与顶级安全! 🌟 为何选择星驰? - 超快速度:全球200+节点,4K视频、游戏零延迟! - 隐私保护:全程加密,零日志,安心隐身。 - 全能兼容:手机、电脑一键畅连,解锁Netflix、YouTube无障碍。 - 免费试用:无限流量,免费适用,24/7客服在线,30秒上手! 🌟 现在加入,畅享无界网络! ⭐️ 免费试用:https://w.xcvpn.com ⭐️ 免费试用:https://w.xcvpn.com ⭐️ 免费试用:https://w.xcvpn.com 🌟 星驰官方客服:@SmallChampion #星驰VPN #网络自由 快来体验,分享好友,一起解锁无限可能!
❤3
File, posted without a caption
❤1
Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @aa_apk. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,252,536 of 1,626,935entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“破解软件-破解VPN-精品软件大全” (@aa_apk), 82,115 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/aa_apk.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.