Identifican a César Marrero, economista de la UCV, en video viral... Los leo en los comentarios... 🌐https://x.com/DelmiroDeBarrio/status/2105740038814433624?s=20 📱 https://www.instagram.com/reel/Dd9sI2UNgWG/?stkn=cGo2Y2YwOTdoZHZt
👏40🤡2❤1

Channel
@SucesosDelmirodeBarrio
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
42,464subscribers
-194 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001315572775 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @SucesosDelmirodeBarrio |
| Description | Reportes al momento Canal para mayores de 18 años 🔞 🚨🚨Advertencia: Las imágenes pueden herir la sensibilidad de algunas personas. |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 26 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 35 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 26 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/SucesosDelmirodeBarrio |
National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 26 Sept 2026, 13:17 | 42,464 | -24 |
| 19 Sept 2026, 11:36 | 42,488 | -19 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 03:18 | 42,507 | -18 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 06:54 | 42,525 | +16 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 18:18 | 42,509 | +29 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 21:17 | 42,480 | -29 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 13:57 | 42,509 | -53 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 08:57 | 42,562 | -2 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 03:41 | 42,564 | -18 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 19:29 | 42,582 | -5 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 18:46 | 42,587 | -4 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 16:14 | 42,591 | -6 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 17:13 | 42,597 | -6 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 15:28 | 42,603 | -11 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 12:16 | 42,614 | -12 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 11:26 | 42,626 | +43 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 14:25 | 42,583 | -5 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 15:15 | 42,588 | +46 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 14:27 | 42,542 | +6 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 23:17 | 42,536 | first reading |
155 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 107 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 155 (30 July 2026 – 1 October 2026) |
| Views total | 843,450 |
| Reactions total | 4,648 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 2 Oct 2026, 01:23 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 2 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 89 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
9,323 reactions across 154 posts, in 44 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 17.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🤬 | 1,638 | 17.6% | |
| ❤ | 1,317 | 14.1% | |
| 🤡 | 1,058 | 11.3% | |
| 💩 | 960 | 10.3% | |
| 👍 | 754 | 8.09% | |
| 👏 | 654 | 7.01% | |
| 🔥 | 449 | 4.82% | |
| 😱 | 363 | 3.89% | |
| 🤣 | 307 | 3.29% | |
| 🙏 | 211 | 2.26% | |
| 🤮 | 209 | 2.24% | |
| 🤔 | 184 | 1.97% | |
| 😭 | 151 | 1.62% | |
| 🤯 | 147 | 1.58% | |
| 😢 | 128 | 1.37% | |
| 😁 | 119 | 1.28% | |
| 🥴 | 115 | 1.23% | |
| 🕊 | 100 | 1.07% | |
| 😡 | 80 | 0.858% | |
| 👎 | 77 | 0.826% | |
| 24 further kinds | 302 | 3.24% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 154 of the 155 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 9,323 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 155 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 1 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Identifican a César Marrero, economista de la UCV, en video viral... Los leo en los comentarios... 🌐https://x.com/DelmiroDeBarrio/status/2105740038814433624?s=20 📱 https://www.instagram.com/reel/Dd9sI2UNgWG/?stkn=cGo2Y2YwOTdoZHZt
👏40🤡2❤1
Photo, posted without a caption
🤔8❤2👍2👏1💩1
🆘🆘#ACTUALIZACIÓN Venezolano baleado por el ICE en Austin, Texas, la semana pasada fue acusado por el Departamento de Justicia de los Estados Unidos por cargos de agresión a un oficial federal, después de que los agentes indicaran que la cámara corporal muestra a Wilber Rafael Garcés Pérez golpeando a un oficial del ICE con su vehículo cuando huyó de la escena la primera vez que fue parado por los agentes. Según la …
👍12❤9🤔8🕊4💩3👏1
Delcy informa que harán una «reforma parcial» de la Ley contra el Odio. Esta ley fue inventada por el chavismo en 2017 para poder encarcelar a miles de venezolanos que se oponen al régimen. Con esta ley, el régimen chavista violó desde la libertad de expresión hasta el derecho a la protesta; incluso muchas personas fueron encarceladas por escribir lo que pensaban en sus redes sociales. En algunos casos bastó con un …
💩37🤔17❤9👎5👀1🖕1😁1
Versión policial de lo sucedido en el sector Los Ojitos, municipio San Joaquín, Carabobo. Funcionarios adscritos a la Brigada Motorizada de la Policía Municipal de San Joaquín recibieron una llamada en su comando en la que fueron informados sobre una situación irregular en el sector Los Ojitos, calle Santander, adyacente a la clínica Durán Pineda. Al llegar, visualizaron a un ciudadano armado con un cuchillo y en ac…
🤔32👍10❤3🤨2🔥1
🆘🆘Carabobo Policía Municipal de San Joaquín mata a un ciudadano en la vía pública.🆘🆘 Vecinos del sector Los Ojitos del municipio San Joaquín, en el estado Carabobo, denuncian una situación irregular en la que un funcionario de la Policía Municipal de San Joaquín habría disparado contra un ciudadano, quien murió en el lugar. En varios videos difundidos por familiares y vecinos se aprecia el cuerpo de un joven que pre…
😡42❤15😱5🤬4👏2💩2🤔1
Video, posted without a caption
🤡114🖕17🤬5❤3🤣3
Líder del «Colectivo La Piedrita» reta al CICPC: Valentín Santana, quien comanda el grupo irregular conocido como “Colectivo La Piedrita”, con centro de operaciones en la parroquia 23 de Enero de Caracas, difundió un audio en el que asegura saber que el CICPC lo busca. En la grabación, Santana se dirige a los funcionarios del CICPC tildándolos de “mercenarios” y les advierte que se preparen para combatir porque ello…
💩66🤡26❤9🤔3🤨3🔥2🕊2😱2
¡Piénsalo! 🤣🤣🤣
🥴51😁15❤8🤬6🤨1
🆘Actuación policial irregular.🆘 En un video difundido en redes sociales se aprecia a varios uniformados que intentan someter a un ciudadano e incluso mencionan que se llevarán su moto, pero nunca precisan el motivo de la acción policial, mientras que el ciudadano manifiesta que le rompieron la cabeza con un casco cuando hacía un reparto en el sector La Cañada de la ciudad de Coro, municipio Miranda, estado Falcón. …
🤬42🤡5❤4
🆘🆘Someten a presuntos funcionarios y queman su camioneta en el municipio Mara, Edo. Zulia. Habitantes y comerciantes de la zona sometieron y retuvieron a varios sujetos señalados como presuntos funcionarios policiales. Efectivos de la Guardia Nacional Bolivariana (GNB) acudieron al lugar para mediar y retirar a los sujetos retenidos. Tras su retiro, miembros de la comunidad incendiaron el vehículo (una camioneta bla…
👍39👏15❤8🤬4🔥2
Sucesos@DelmiroDeBarrio pinned «https://t.me/boost/SucesosDelmirodeBarrio»
Showing the 12 most recent of 155 posts we hold for @SucesosDelmirodeBarrio. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@SucesosDelmirodeBarrio edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@SucesosDelmirodeBarrio named 6 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 29 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 7 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Sucesos@DelmiroDeBarrio” (@SucesosDelmirodeBarrio), 42,464 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/SucesosDelmirodeBarrio.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.