Channel
@RDNDigital
On this record: Topic · Previous handles · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
15,655subscribers
-485 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001000482983 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @RDNDigital |
| Created | Between 1 September 2015 and 31 December 2015 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 38 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 9 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/RDNDigital |
National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Recorded in 2019 as “RDN Digital” — the title held for this same channel (matched by Telegram id, not by handle) in the Pushshift Telegram Dataset, a third-party archive captured in 2019-2020, years before this register made its own first observation. CC BY 4.0, Baumgartner, Zannettou, Squire & Blackburn (2020), Zenodo. A third party’s dated snapshot, not a measurement this register made itself.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Oct 2026, 01:19 | 15,655 | -30 |
| 4 Oct 2026, 16:21 | 15,685 | -68 |
| 26 Sept 2026, 18:39 | 15,753 | -48 |
| 19 Sept 2026, 13:17 | 15,801 | -19 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 00:59 | 15,820 | -11 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 02:15 | 15,831 | -17 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 10:59 | 15,848 | -10 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 13:17 | 15,858 | -21 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 19:56 | 15,879 | -26 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 15:17 | 15,905 | -8 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 14:37 | 15,913 | -8 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 07:12 | 15,921 | -10 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 04:09 | 15,931 | -12 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 01:35 | 15,943 | -4 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 01:56 | 15,947 | -5 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 04:04 | 15,952 | -8 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 00:44 | 15,960 | -10 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 03:29 | 15,970 | -2 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 06:23 | 15,972 | -6 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 04:54 | 15,978 | first reading |
43 posts held, back to 10 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 54 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 43 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 September 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
769 reactions across 41 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 370 | 48.1% | |
| 👍 | 200 | 26.0% | |
| 👀 | 52 | 6.76% | |
| 🤡 | 46 | 5.98% | |
| 👏 | 32 | 4.16% | |
| 🤷♂ | 22 | 2.86% | |
| 🤔 | 19 | 2.47% | |
| 🔥 | 10 | 1.30% | |
| 😁 | 4 | 0.52% | |
| 🤪 | 4 | 0.52% | |
| 🥴 | 4 | 0.52% | |
| 🥱 | 2 | 0.26% | |
| ❤🔥 | 1 | 0.13% | |
| 👌 | 1 | 0.13% | |
| 😴 | 1 | 0.13% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 0.13% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 43 of the 43 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 812 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 43 most recent posts we hold, published 10 July 2026 to 3 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🆁🅳🅽 DIGITAL 📰 Jueves – 03/09/2026 Edición N° 4.038 – Año 16 Editor: Francisco Muñoz - Periodista WhatsApp: wa.me/34614277940 Email: [email protected] Redes: Instagram.com/RDNDigital EDITORIAL La comedia de enredos entre Washington y Caracas vive su momento de mayor esplendor: mientras la Casa Blanca celebra como un «día histórico» la firma de acuerdos que extienden el control norteamericano sobre los yacimientos —…
❤2👍1
🆁🅳🅽 DIGITAL 📰 Miércoles – 02/09/2026 Edición N° 4.037 – Año 16 Editor: Francisco Muñoz - Periodista WhatsApp: wa.me/34614277940 Email: [email protected] Redes: Instagram.com/RDNDigital EDITORIAL El sainete de la diplomacia energética venezolana ha alcanzado niveles de comedia absurda: mientras Washington afirma que el acuerdo petrolero se extenderá por un siglo para ahuyentar las garras de China y Rusia, Delcy Rod…
❤8👍5🤪2👏1🤡1
🆁🅳🅽 DIGITAL 📰 Martes – 01/09/2026 Edición N° 4.036 – Año 16 Editor: Francisco Muñoz - Periodista WhatsApp: wa.me/34614277940 Email: [email protected] Redes: Instagram.com/RDNDigital EDITORIAL Hay una ironía descarada en presenciar cómo Washington y Caracas celebran al alimón el reinicio del mapa económico nacional: mientras Donald Trump presume haber cerrado «el mejor trato jamás hecho» para que EEUU se asegure cr…
❤5👍4👏2🤪2🤡1🤷♂1
🆁🅳🅽 DIGITAL 📰 Lunes – 31/08/2026 Edición N° 4.035 – Año 16 Editor: Francisco Muñoz - Periodista WhatsApp: wa.me/34614277940 Email: [email protected] Redes: Instagram.com/RDNDigital 🇻🇪 PAÍS • Sin nuevo balance se mantiene en 6.509 los fallecidos por el doble terremoto en Venezuela • La toma del petróleo venezolano sella la alianza entre Donald Trump y Delcy Rodríguez • Venezuela recibiría un estimado de $19 por bar…
❤9👍7👀1👏1🤡1🤷♂1
🆁🅳🅽 DIGITAL 📰 Viernes – 28/08/2026 Edición N° 4.034 – Año 16 Editor: Francisco Muñoz - Periodista WhatsApp: wa.me/34614277940 Email: [email protected] Redes: Instagram.com/RDNDigital 🇻🇪 PAÍS • Sin nuevo balance se mantiene en 6.509 los fallecidos por el doble terremoto en Venezuela • El número de desaparecidos reportados por el doble terremoto es de 29.523 según el portal: desaparecidosterremotovenezuela.com • Adv…
❤10👍6👀2👏1🤡1🤷♂1
🆁🅳🅽 DIGITAL 📰 Jueves – 27/08/2026 Edición N° 4.033 – Año 16 Editor: Francisco Muñoz - Periodista WhatsApp: wa.me/34614277940 Email: [email protected] Redes: Instagram.com/RDNDigital 🇻🇪 PAÍS • Sin nuevo balance se mantiene en 6.509 los fallecidos por el doble terremoto en Venezuela • El número de desaparecidos reportados por el doble terremoto se mantiene en 29.523 • Provea exigió al gobierno un registro público y …
👍12❤9🤔2👀1👏1🔥1🤡1🤷♂1
🆁🅳🅽 DIGITAL 📰 Miércoles – 26/08/2026 Edición N° 4.032 – Año 16 Editor: Francisco Muñoz - Periodista WhatsApp: wa.me/34614277940 Email: [email protected] Redes: Instagram.com/RDNDigital 🇻🇪 PAÍS • Sin nuevo balance se mantiene en 6.509 los fallecidos por el doble terremoto en Venezuela • El número de desaparecidos reportados por el doble terremoto es de 29.523 según el portal: desaparecidosterremotovenezuela.com • D…
❤13👍5👀2👏1🔥1🤡1
🆁🅳🅽 DIGITAL 📰 Martes – 25/08/2026 Edición N° 4.031 – Año 16 Editor: Francisco Muñoz - Periodista WhatsApp: wa.me/34614277940 Email: [email protected] Redes: Instagram.com/RDNDigital 🇻🇪 PAÍS • Gobierno eleva a 6.509 la cifra fallecidos tras el doble terremoto, según nuevo balance oficial • El número de desaparecidos reportados por el doble terremoto es de 29.523 • Capriles denuncia falta de cifras de desaparecidos …
👏8👍5👀3❤1🤡1🤷♂1
🆁🅳🅽 DIGITAL 📰 Lunes – 24/08/2026 Edición N° 4.030 – Año 16 Editor: Francisco Muñoz - Periodista WhatsApp: wa.me/34614277940 Email: [email protected] Redes: Instagram.com/RDNDigital 🇻🇪 PAÍS • Sin nuevo balance se mantiene en 6.438 los fallecidos por el doble terremoto en Venezuela • Se registran tres sismos entre la isla La Tortuga y Güiria: magnitudes 4,5, 4,1 y 3,4 • Gobierno activa mecanismos alternos para atend…
👍8❤4👀2👏2🤡1🤷♂1
🆁🅳🅽 DIGITAL 📰 Viernes – 21/08/2026 Edición N° 4.029 – Año 16 Editor: Francisco Muñoz - Periodista WhatsApp: wa.me/34614277940 Email: [email protected] Redes: Instagram.com/RDNDigital 🇻🇪 PAÍS • Sin nuevo balance se mantiene en 6.438 los fallecidos por el doble terremoto en Venezuela • El número de desaparecidos reportados por el doble terremoto es de 29.521 según el portal: desaparecidosterremotovenezuela.com • Con…
❤12👍5👀2🤡2🔥1🥱1
🆁🅳🅽 DIGITAL 📰 Jueves – 20/08/2026 Edición N° 4.028 – Año 16 Editor: Francisco Muñoz - Periodista WhatsApp: wa.me/34614277940 Email: [email protected] Redes: Instagram.com/RDNDigital 🇻🇪 PAÍS • Sin nuevo balance se mantiene en 6.438 los fallecidos por el doble terremoto en Venezuela • El número de desaparecidos reportados por el doble terremoto se mantiene en 29.521 • Funvisis reporta 1.796 eventos telúricos tras la…
❤10👍3👀2👏1🤡1
🆁🅳🅽 DIGITAL 📰 Miércoles – 19/08/2026 Edición N° 4.027 – Año 16 Editor: Francisco Muñoz - Periodista WhatsApp: wa.me/34614277940 Email: [email protected] Redes: Instagram.com/RDNDigital 🇻🇪 PAÍS • Sin nuevo balance se mantiene en 6.438 los fallecidos por el doble terremoto en Venezuela • El número de desaparecidos reportados por el doble terremoto es de 29.521 según el portal: desaparecidosterremotovenezuela.com • E…
❤14👍6👀1🔥1🤔1🤡1
Showing the 12 most recent of 43 posts we hold for @RDNDigital. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 17 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“🆁🅳🅽 Digital” (@RDNDigital), 15,655 subscribers as measured 9 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/RDNDigital.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.