This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
3 measurements taken within a single day, net +2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 632–634 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
7 Aug 2026, 11:05
634
+2
6 Aug 2026, 17:32
632
no change
6 Aug 2026, 15:34
632
first reading
Engagement
15 posts held, back to 8 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
205.0%
avg views ÷ 634 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,300
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
9.74%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 15 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 July 2026
Posts held
15 (8 March 2026 – 30 July 2026)
Views total
3,900
Reactions total
380
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
6 Aug 2026, 17:32 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
1,597 reactions across 15 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
custom 5314403794027569677
490
30.7%
custom 5274180248479484480
480
30.1%
❤
410
25.7%
❤🔥
114
7.14%
🔥
54
3.38%
🍓
34
2.13%
💋
12
0.751%
🕊
3
0.188%
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,597reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 8 March 2026 to 30 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
53
across the posts below
Posts paid on
9
of 15 we hold a reading for · 60%
Most on one post
30
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Strange_Valley. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 15 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 8 March 2026 to 30 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
🪷Готов арт с Панталоне и Дотторе в сеттинге древнего Китая.
🪷Мне так понравилась эта парочка, что решила дополнительно еще и аушку написать для атмосферы. Приятного прочтения!
Тонкая белоснежная струйка дыма медленно струилась вверх от курительной трубки, разливаясь в воздухе неприятной сладостью и исчезая в порывах ледяного ветра. Зашелестели листья ивы от тихого стука капель о тонкие лазурные пластинки.
Мужчина,…
🤩Как только дали интернет сразу бегу вам показывать новый наряд для Линь Дэя.
🤩В последнее время мне очень нравится сочетание алого и лазурного, поэтому под раздачу сразу попадают ос.
🤩Как вы тут? Не скучаете? Я честно стараюсь чаще выкладывать, но из-за подготовки к экзаменам ничего не успеваю.
🌿Держите чиби Чу Минкэ из новеллы "Сломить весеннее величие". Рисовала для моего чудесного котика. Она, как раз переводит эту и еще несколько книг. Пожелаем ей удачи в этом!
🌿Кстати, книгу очень советую. Главные герои там самим автором описываются как пес и волчонок. Она не такая длинная, но мне понравилась.
🪷Я не смогу долго жить без артов по Вину. Это книга, к которой всегда хочется возвращаться.
🪷Так что наслаждаемся новой порцией Цэчжоу.
🪷Это, опять, должен был быть цветной набросок, но вышло что-то между полноценкой и скетчем. 🙈
🤩Сделала небольшой скетч с Фан Лао из БТМ в современном ау.
днем я обычный скрипач, но ночью возглавляю мафию
С Маро.
🤩С каждым разом все больше убеждаюсь, что люблю рисовать чб гораздо больше, чем в цвете.
🤩Что ж, на этот арт ушло много времени, но результат оказался приятным, так что оно стоило затраченных сил.
🤩Изначально я еще хотела написать к ним ау, но тогда бы вы так и не дождались арта. 😳
#ОС
#Рисунки
🤩Я рисую, а не сижу без дела, честно пхах. Просто на этот арт уходит слишком много сил и времени.
🤩Я даже первого персонажа не закончила рисовать, а еще второй, украшения и фон. 😩
#процесс
🤩Пока есть свободное время, решила немного поработать над скиллом, поэтому пока только стадиками занимаюсь и показать вам нечего.
🤩Держите скетч с ос в сеттинге Медного воробья. Надеюсь, что хоть это я закончу не через пару недель. А то уже почти 14 часов сижу над этим артом. Только-только начала красить.
🤩Сегодня все утро занималась эскизами для адресников и логотипом. 😭
#процесс
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @Strange_Valley. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 43,241 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Strange valley [18+]” (@Strange_Valley), 634 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Strange_Valley.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
