Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

‧₊˚✧Обитель Серебряной Луны✧˚₊‧

@AbodeSilverMoon

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

32subscribers

+2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002198392268
TypeChannel
Username@AbodeSilverMoon
Created23 June 2024measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/AbodeSilverMoon

Growth

3032317 August 2026 — 30 subscribers11 August 2026 — 30 subscribers14 August 2026 — 32 subscribers7 August 202614 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 7 days, net +2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 30–32 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 12:3832+2
11 Aug 2026, 04:1630no change
7 Aug 2026, 16:1730first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 23 June 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
165.6%
avg views ÷ 32 subscribers
Avg views / post
53.0
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
9.43%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 August 2026
Posts held20 (23 June 20244 August 2026)
Views total106
Reactions total10
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Aug 2026, 04:16 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
3m 23s
Average length
15s

Measured directly from 14 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

101 reactions across 19 posts, in 19 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 53102540223959702303029.7%
custom 53121193352825575501110.9%
custom 53663823085824986071110.9%
1110.9%
custom 532567551478910986076.93%
custom 519301354420282307743.96%
💘43.96%
custom 519281232927997278332.97%
custom 523813168602102403132.97%
custom 526939461123470005532.97%
custom 536411101391225568932.97%
custom 538660284710834709732.97%
custom 530983078772868799621.98%
custom 521976228269473415010.99%
custom 526701167318455568310.99%
custom 547427403883665291510.99%
🍓10.99%
💋10.99%
🔥10.99%

Custom emoji. 14 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 101reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 23 June 2024 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

4 Aug 2026, 21:36 UTC50 views6 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Video

🤩🤩 🤩🤩 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 Пока монтаж полноценного эдита с анимацией ещё находится на стадии не завершенных проектов, то вот вам небольшой мем по новелее "Поднося вино". ✨✨✨ Как вы думаете, кому бы ещё подошёл этот звук? 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 #QJJ

custom 52381316860210240313custom 52693946112347000553

1 Aug 2026, 10:08 UTC56 views4 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Video

🏮🏮🏮🏮🏮🏮🏮🏮🏮🏮🏮🏮 💜Доброе время суток. Прошло уже больше года моего отпуска и я снова в строю с новыми идеями, контентом и направлением в плане новелл.💟💞 ✨Сегодня у нас новелла "Топить в вине бушующее пламя печали" от Priest. 🐤Персонаж: Сюань Цзи.❤️ 🏮А как вы? Как лето проходит? Может есть пожелания насчет эдита по какой-нибудь новелле? Будет интересно вас почитать.🎭 🌂Возможно эдиты по Благословение небожителей будут

3🔥1

17 Sept 2025, 17:55 UTC193 views9 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Video

📝📝📝📝📝📝 📝📝📝📝📝 🤩🤩🤩📝📝📝📝📝🤩🤩🤩 🫶Думаю, что не я одна удивлена, увидеть этот канал живым. 🫶Честно, то я думал, что этот канал уже навсегда останется мертвым и я уже не вернусь к созданию эдитов. 🫶Но как вы все знаете жизнь непредсказуема. И я недавно снова открыла программу для монтажа, так что пришла к вам с небольшим, простым эдитом. #видео #QJJ

custom 53256755147891098607custom 52670116731845556831custom 54742740388366529151

17 Jun 2025, 08:18 UTC212 views10 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

🌷🌷 🌷🌷🌷🌷 🏮Это немного не по теме канала(под вайб зато подходит), но мне очень нравится эта фотография и я захотела вам её показать🌷

custom 531025402239597023010

7 Jun 2025, 18:17 UTC202 views5 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Вот зарисовка

custom 53663823085824986075

7 Jun 2025, 18:16 UTC172 views6 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @Strange_Valley

Ау к арту по Цэчжоу.

custom 53102540223959702303custom 52197622826947341501custom 53098307877286879961custom 53121193352825575501

7 Jun 2025, 18:12 UTC181 views6 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Video

➖➖🐋🐋🐋🐋🐋🐋🐋➖➖ ➖🐋🐋🐋🐋🐋🐋🐋➖ ➖➖🐋🐋🐋🐋🐋➖➖ 🔸Да, после обновления канала, я пришла к вам с новшеством.🏮 💘У нас сегодня видео с артом моей знакомой.🌺 🏮Это AU по новелле "Поднося вино", где один из главных героев - Шэнь Цзэчуань является хули-цзин🦊 #QJJ #видео

custom 53102540223959702302custom 53866028471083470972custom 53098307877286879961custom 53121193352825575501

7 Jun 2025, 15:23 UTC165 views4 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Video

Где заказать такой китайский шкаф?🤔 #QJJ #видео #перезалив

custom 51930135442028230774

7 Jun 2025, 15:20 UTC164 views7 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Video

Автор артика Душите меня, прекрасная женщина ❤️ #tianguancifu #видео #перезалив

custom 53663823085824986074custom 53102540223959702303

7 Jun 2025, 15:08 UTC161 views5 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Video

Хуа Чен буквально: Ангел шепчет мое имя #tianguancifu #видео #перезалив

custom 53121193352825575505

7 Jun 2025, 15:02 UTC130 views5 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Video

К нам пожаловал Генерал Пэй 🐈 #tianguancifu #видео #перезалив

custom 53102540223959702305

7 Jun 2025, 14:57 UTC148 views5 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Video

Автор арта Есть тут любители черноцетов?🍁 Отвезите меня в лес в этом багажнике #tianguancifu #видео #перезалив

custom 53102540223959702305

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @AbodeSilverMoon. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

1 Jun 2025, 13:43 UTCAnonymous Poll20 voters

На водяной знак..

  1. Ворон🐦‍⬛️75%
  2. Сова🦉20%
  3. Для меня5%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 23 June 2024 to 4 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“‧₊˚✧Обитель Серебряной Луны✧˚₊‧” (@AbodeSilverMoon), 32 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/AbodeSilverMoon.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.