Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ⟠˚₊· 𝐅𝐨𝐮𝐫 𝐅𝐥𝐚𝐤𝐞𝐬 𝐨𝐟 𝐒𝐭𝐚𝐫𝐝𝐨𝐦: 𝑩𝑳𝑰𝑵𝑲 ꒱◌ུ·₊˚

Channel

⟠˚₊· 𝐅𝐨𝐮𝐫 𝐅𝐥𝐚𝐤𝐞𝐬 𝐨𝐟 𝐒𝐭𝐚𝐫𝐝𝐨𝐦: 𝑩𝑳𝑰𝑵𝑲 ꒱◌ུ·₊˚

@StardomBLINK

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

185subscribers

-2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001436045146
TypeChannel
Username@StardomBLINK
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/StardomBLINK

Growth

1851871866 August 2026 — 187 subscribers7 August 2026 — 187 subscribers15 August 2026 — 185 subscribers6 August 202615 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 9 days, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 185–187 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 16:38185-2
7 Aug 2026, 07:17187no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:34187first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 10 October 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 July 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥1100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 10 October 2024 to 9 July 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

9 Jul 2025, 13:28 UTC152 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @BLACKPINKYGEPhoto

ㅤ ˖˙⊹ Clamor of soirée endowment, magniloquent paragon to queme the dash of #JUMP ’s leap! 𝄞⨾𓍢ִ໋ ㅤ

9 Jul 2025, 13:28 UTC258 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @BLACKPINKYGESticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

9 Jul 2025, 13:28 UTC206 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @BLACKPINKYGE

ㅤ Amidst the grain of roseau sand, a river of glory runs from hollow hands towards the aching flesh. Along the sting of the stretched land and beneath the blazing sun, along the warmth in swirling shards into the heaving mounds, an eureka of oasis has been found. Down below the dips and drifting ground, hear the sway of longing and yearning. Barren forth and yet a momentary halt should be short to the delight. T

13 Feb 2025, 12:35 UTC265 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @BLACKPINKYGE

Temulous surfeit into this comeback ebullience, scintillant prickle beneath vinous effervescence spiraling within fragile chalice, presently stretch across the passageways from innermost soul. February 14th; marking the highly-anticipated ingress of the preternaturally gifted Kim Jisoo with her inaugural mini album that deigned to bestow upon it: "AMORTAGE!" ❋ Amalgamate the bacchanalia and disseminate #AMORTAGE! To

13 Feb 2025, 12:34 UTC172 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @BLACKPINKYGEPhoto

ㅤㅤ ㅤ LASSIE’S SERENITY SNATCH HARMONIOUS RETURN: KIM JISOO! ENTITY. | 𑠠 FRONTWARDS.

16 Jan 2025, 04:53 UTC271 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Thank you for the endearing birthday greetings, @PlNKPUNK. It’s our pleasure to celebrate another birthday of one of our muses again alongside you this year. 🥺♥️

🔥1

16 Jan 2025, 04:52 UTC234 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @PlNKPUNKPhoto

Concerning the most winsome lady, precisely on this fine day, January 16th, she has been embellished with heaps of smiles that elevate her pleasing persona. A massive, gleaming butterfly shall serve as an allusion to the merriment within her heart, and we assure you she deserves to embrace the truly remarkable reminiscences of her life. Nonetheless, we wish to express our admiration for her, Jennie Kim. God must have

15 Jan 2025, 06:13 UTC130 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @JenniesBDayPhoto

ㅤ 𑣿 ᎒ Mosaic of love, a coruscation of beauty, emerged from the querencia of reminiscences, may the fondness in its legacy will bring All Our Love For Jennie. ꒱ ㅤ

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @StardomBLINK. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 147,860 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 35 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“⟠˚₊· 𝐅𝐨𝐮𝐫 𝐅𝐥𝐚𝐤𝐞𝐬 𝐨𝐟 𝐒𝐭𝐚𝐫𝐝𝐨𝐦: 𝑩𝑳𝑰𝑵𝑲 ꒱◌ུ·₊˚” (@StardomBLINK), 185 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/StardomBLINK.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.