Photo, posted without a caption

Channel
β‘οΈπΎππππππππππβ‘οΈ
@Sporkin8or
On this record: Growth Β· Engagement Β· Reactions Β· Posts Β· Citations Β· Cite this entry
234subscribers
+2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001196748657 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Sporkin8or |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021β estimated from Telegramβs id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Sporkin8or |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 10:17 | 234 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 04:46 | 233 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 02:47 | 232 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 05:35 | 232 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 β the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelβs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegramβs post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR Β· 30 days
- 24.1%
- avg views Γ· 234 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 56.5
- 20 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 2.50%
- reactions Γ· views Β· ER floor
- Posts in window
- 20
- of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) Γ· viewsβ note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegramβs public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 12 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days Β· latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (31 July 2026 β 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,130 |
| Reactions total | 22 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface β not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 02:47 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than βcorrectingβ the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form β 8.12K, 3.7M β so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded β read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
22 reactions across 12 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| π | 8 | 36.4% | |
| π€£ | 8 | 36.4% | |
| π | 3 | 13.6% | |
| π | 3 | 13.6% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β π is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β 4.34K, 1.2M β so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramβs own count on each post β not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β those same posts carry 22reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by βa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageβ.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
I found this video on some "Christian brotherhood" channel. True love itself is the love of Jesus Christ, and that is what men ought to seek π―
This is how the government actually pays for things π€
The State of Globers in 2026 [ XMPP Group Chat ] π±πππ π°ππππ πΎππππππ
What happened to your god? "Oh... you know... he got eaten by a White man."
Hindus be like "What happened to our god!?!?" Oh sorry. I was hungry OM NOM NOM NOM.
π1
Photo, posted without a caption
NASA Official π
π€£1
Delicate balance of Fake and Gay.
π€£1
ππ¦π«π‘ π²π° ππ± @AntiPentecostal
ππ«π±π¦ ππ―π¬π«π€ πππΆ ππ‘π³π’π«π±π¦π°πͺ | ππ«π±π¦-ππ’π«π±π’π π¬π°π±ππ©π¦π°πͺ
π1
Wanna here a joke? Jesus Christ secretly returned and is already ruling and reigning, secretly. Hahaha HAHAHAHAHA HAHAHA HAHAHAHAHA HAHAHA HAHAHAHAHA. Hilarious π
π€£3π2
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Sporkin8or. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank β 168,031 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below β republished posts weigh more than named mentions β and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channelβs name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page β a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
@antihinduism Β· 9881 postππ«π±π¦ πππ°π¬π«π―πΆ
@AntiMasonry Β· 2,5001 postπ²πππππ π³ππππππ π°ππππππ
@GlobalHoaxing Β· 451 postShitposting Repository
@shitpostrepository Β· 9221 post
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
@Just_a_Journey Β· 2562 postsππ«π±π¦ ππ―π¬π«π€ πππΆ ππ‘π³π’π«π±π¦π°πͺ
@Anti_Adventists Β· 2641 postπ¬πππ π±ππππ πΏπππππππ
@AntiFalseTeachers Β· 5251 postππ«π±π¦-ππ’π«π±π’π π¬π°π±ππ©π¦π°πͺ
@AntiPentecostal Β· 5541 postπ±πππ π°ππππ πΎππππππ
@flatearth Β· 45,4111 postNEET Lifestyle Magazine
@neetmaxxed Β· 8341 postStrength Made Perfect
@PapaMoonedits Β· 1,1701 post
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@AntiPentecostal Β· 5542 postsππ«π±π¦ ππ―π¬π«π€ πππΆ ππ‘π³π’π«π±π¦π°πͺ
@Anti_Adventists Β· 2641 postπ¬πππ π±ππππ πΏπππππππ
@AntiFalseTeachers Β· 5251 postπ±πππ π°ππππ πΎππππππ
@flatearth Β· 45,4111 postStrength Made Perfect
@PapaMoonedits Β· 1,1701 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason β naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides β the βNamed by N registered channelsβ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 β this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
ββ‘οΈπΎππππππππππβ‘οΈβ (@Sporkin8or), 234 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Sporkin8or.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.