Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Strength Made Perfect

@PapaMoonedits

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,170subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001495600751
TypeChannel
Username@PapaMoonedits
Created17 March 2021measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/PapaMoonedits

Growth

1,1701,1821,1766 August 2026 — 1,170 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,170 subscribers9 August 2026 — 1,182 subscribers12 August 2026 — 1,170 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 6 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,168–1,184 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 11:181,170-12
9 Aug 2026, 06:411,182+12
6 Aug 2026, 08:511,170no change
6 Aug 2026, 06:501,170first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 27 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
10.5%
avg views ÷ 1,170 subscribers
Avg views / post
123
19 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.81%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
19
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026
Posts held19 (27 July 20265 August 2026)
Views total2,337
Reactions total89
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 08:51 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 12:40 UTC≈41 views4 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Ephesians 6 : 10 - 17 KJB “Finally, my brethren, be strong in the Lord, and in the power of his might. Put on the whole armour of God, that ye may be able to stand against the wiles of the devil. For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places. Wherefore take unto you the whole arm

5 Aug 2026, 02:44 UTC≈54 views9 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

Streets seized and taken over by Islamists in Houston. Not a single thing being done to stop this deliberate takeover.

2 Aug 2026, 23:18 UTC≈94 views7 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

𝔖𝔱𝔯𝔢𝔫𝔤𝔱𝔥 𝔐𝔞𝔡𝔢 𝒫𝑒𝓇𝒻𝑒𝒸𝓉

2 Aug 2026, 15:01 UTC≈96 views6 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

𝔖𝔱𝔯𝔢𝔫𝔤𝔱𝔥 𝔐𝔞𝔡𝔢 𝒫𝑒𝓇𝒻𝑒𝒸𝓉 🏔️

2 Aug 2026, 12:38 UTC≈102 views7 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

𝔖𝔱𝔯𝔢𝔫𝔤𝔱𝔥 𝔐𝔞𝔡𝔢 𝒫𝑒𝓇𝒻𝑒𝒸𝓉

2 Aug 2026, 09:50 UTC≈88 views4 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

𝕻𝖗𝖊𝖙𝖆𝖗𝖉𝖎𝖘𝖒〘 𝔸𝕟𝕥𝕚 ℙ𝕣𝕖𝕥𝕖𝕣𝕚𝕤𝕞 〙

1 Aug 2026, 17:35 UTC≈230 views4 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

Basic Soulwinning Demonstration 𝔖𝔱𝔯𝔢𝔫𝔤𝔱𝔥 𝔐𝔞𝔡𝔢 𝒫𝑒𝓇𝒻𝑒𝒸𝓉

1 Aug 2026, 01:40 UTC≈101 views6 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @AntiDispensationalismPhoto

Peter Ruckman was a damned heretic pushing multiple Gospels, and works salvation. His doctrines on the Bible and denial of the preservation of the word of God, his twisted view of inspiration and the fruit of his teaching being ultradispensationalist insanely Zionist pastors who worship Jews and conservative politics over Christ, as well as his wicked personal life, show that he was a thistle, a thorn. A false prop

31 Jul 2026, 21:06 UTC≈90 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

𝕻𝖗𝖊𝖙𝖆𝖗𝖉𝖎𝖘𝖒〘 𝔸𝕟𝕥𝕚 ℙ𝕣𝕖𝕥𝕖𝕣𝕚𝕤𝕞 〙

31 Jul 2026, 08:16 UTC≈85 views4 reactionsread 6 August 2026

If you wanna destroy Hindus, join this chat: https://t.me/+x8_NoD8gkG0xMTdk

30 Jul 2026, 21:40 UTC≈103 views8 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

You can't control other people 𝔖𝔱𝔯𝔢𝔫𝔤𝔱𝔥 𝔐𝔞𝔡𝔢 𝒫𝑒𝓇𝒻𝑒𝒸𝓉

30 Jul 2026, 09:14 UTC≈128 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

𝔖𝔱𝔯𝔢𝔫𝔤𝔱𝔥 𝔐𝔞𝔡𝔢 𝒫𝑒𝓇𝒻𝑒𝒸𝓉

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @PapaMoonedits. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 26,987 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 12 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Strength Made Perfect” (@PapaMoonedits), 1,170 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/PapaMoonedits.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.