Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Sinateb/سیناطب

@Sinatebpub

On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,936subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001018850908
TypeChannel
Username@Sinatebpub
Descriptionکانال رسمی اطلاع رسانی مؤسسه فرهنگی آموزشی انتشاراتی سیناطب وب سایت: Sinapp.app پلتفرم www.sinateb.net اطلاع رسانی فروشگاهی www.rodgoon.com ارتباط با ادمین کانال: @Sinateb_admin @sinateb_admin2 تلفن: 02166944051 ، 52 02166902745 ، 46 09128305212
CreatedBetween 1 December 2015 and 31 March 2016— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged3 times, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Sinatebpub

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear word for word on 2 other registered channels. They sit inside a group of 4 channels that share the same post bodies with each other. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (3 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@Sinatebpub/1234 · this entry26 Nov 2025, 14:11 UTC@Sinateburology/105926 Nov 2025, 14:13 UTC0.963 minutes
@Sinatebpub/1244 · this entry22 Jun 2026, 17:50 UTC@Sinateburology/106522 Jun 2026, 17:59 UTC0.939 minutes
@Sinatebpub/1234 · this entry26 Nov 2025, 14:11 UTC@Sinatebophthalmology/52126 Nov 2025, 14:11 UTC0.96under a minute
Every channel this entry shares post bodies with
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@Sinateburology6 (6/6 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.989 minutesthis entry (60)
@Sinatebophthalmology5 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.9910 minutesthis entry (50)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 0 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 20 comparable posts for this entry, running 29 October 2025 to 30 July 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Across the whole group of 4, the earliest publisher we hold is @Sinateburology. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the key clone_source, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 3 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

1,9366 Aug 2026, 17:16 — 1,936 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 19:30 — 1,936 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 17:166 Aug 2026, 19:30
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,934–1,938 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Aug 2026, 19:301,936no change
6 Aug 2026, 17:161,936first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 29 October 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
45.0%
avg views ÷ 1,936 subscribers
Avg views / post
871
5 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.162%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
5
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 4 of 5 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 July 2026
Posts held20 (29 October 202530 July 2026)
Views total4,355
Reactions total6
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 17:13 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
571
Videos
199
Links
357

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
2m 28s
Average length
49s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

45 reactions across 10 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 80.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
3680.0%
🎉36.67%
🙏36.67%
👌24.44%
👎12.22%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 45reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 29 October 2025 to 30 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

30 Jul 2026, 18:18 UTC≈1,250 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026

♨️ قابل توجه شرکت کنندگان در آزمون ارتقاء 1405 👈 کلید اولیه سؤالات آزمون ارتقای دستیاران تخصصی 1405 که امروز مورخ 1405/05/08 برگزار شد در سامانه وزارت خانه منتشر شد. ✅ جهت رؤیت به لینک زیر مراجعه فرمایید. سامانه آزمون 💯 لازم به ذکر است که بزودی در همین سامانه از طریق مؤسسه سیناطب آزمونهای PMP و KFP و KF برای بورد تخصصی و فوق تخصصی ادوار گذشته در دسترس همه داوطلبان آزمون بورد تخصصی و فوق تخصصی قرار خواهد گرف

2👌1

30 Jul 2026, 17:51 UTC372 views0 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

💙 صدای شما، مهم‌ترین سرمایه ماست | آنچه از شما آموختیم ✅ امروز پس از پایان آزمون ارتقا، پیام‌های محبت‌آمیز، پیشنهادها و حتی انتقادهای ارزشمند بسیاری از شما عزیزان به دست ما رسید. ❇️ خواندن تک‌تک این پیام‌ها، برای ما افتخار و در عین حال مسئولیت بزرگی است. 👈 ما باور داریم که Sinapp و انتشارات سیناطب و نشر رودگون با نظر و همراهی شما رشد کرده‌اند و با همین همراهی نیز بهتر خواهند شد. 📬 اگر تجربه‌ای از استفاده از کتاب

30 Jul 2026, 08:16 UTC≈1,410 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

💙 قهرمانان ارتقای ۱۴۰۵، خسته نباشید. 🌿امروز یکی از مهم‌ترین مراحل مسیر حرفه‌ای خود را پشت سر گذاشتید؛ مسیری که با ساعت‌ها مطالعه، تلاش، پشتکار و امید ساخته شد. ✅ نتیجه هرچه باشد، آنچه ارزشمند است، اراده‌ای است که شما را تا این نقطه رسانده است. این مسیر، پایان یک آزمون نیست؛ آغاز فصل تازه‌ای از یادگیری و رشد است. ☑️ مجموعه ما در سینپ و انتشارات سیناطب سال‌هاست با یک هدف در کنار جامعه پزشکی ایستاده‌ است؛ کمک به یادگ

2🙏1

27 Jul 2026, 07:30 UTC649 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

⏳یک فرصت محدود، برای انتخابی هوشمندانه⌛️ 🚨 به درخواست کاربران، کمپین ویژه ما برای ۲۴ ساعت فعال شده است. 🔥 ۶۰٪ تخفیف دوره‌ها و آزمون‌های آنلاین 🔥 ۵۰٪ تخفیف کتاب‌های الکترونیک 🔥 ۲۵٪ تخفیف کتاب‌های چاپی ⏰ فرصت محدوده، از دستش نده 🔹سینپ 🔺اینستاگرام 〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️ 📌 @Sinatebpub 📞02166902745, 6 📞02166944051, 2

18 Jul 2026, 16:47 UTC674 views0 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @SinatebsurgeryPhoto

📚 پایان سردرگمی بین شوارتز 2019 و سابیستون 2022؛ 🎯 کتاب تحلیل جامع بورد جراحی ۱۴۰۴ منتشر شد! ⁉️ تغییر رفرنس به سابیستون ۲۰۲۲ خیلی‌ها را کلافه کرد، اما ما برای این چالش، یک «نقشه راه» طراحی کردیم. این کتاب فقط یک پاسخنامه نیست؛ یک دوره جمع‌بندی استراتژیک است: ✅ پاسخ‌های تشریحی: استناد مستقیم به متن شوارتز ۲۰۱۹ و سابیستون ۲۰۲۲. ✅ کالبدشکافی گزینه‌های غلط: شناسایی تله‌های تستی و علت اشتباه بودن گزینه‌ها. ✅ رفع هوش

3 Jul 2026, 09:55 UTC≈1,220 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🎧 دوره شنیداری و تحلیلی درماتولوژی بولونیا مطالعه رفرنس بولونیا یکی از مهم‌ترین اما زمان‌برترین بخش‌های دوره رزیدنتی پوست است.حجم بالای مطالب و فرصت محدود، باعث می‌شود بسیاری از رزیدنت‌ها نتوانند مرور منظم و عمیقی روی مباحث داشته باشند. 🎙️در این دوره، مباحث بولونیا به‌صورت گفتگوهای تخصصی، تحلیلی و کیس‌محور ارائه می‌شود تا بتوانید حتی در وقفه‌های کوتاه،بین کارهای روزمره مطالعه خود را ادامه دهید. 📌ویژگی‌های دوره ✅ آ

22 Jun 2026, 17:50 UTC≈1,200 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🎯 کمپین آمادگی آزمون ارتقاء آغاز شد! 🪄فرصت طلایی برای جمع‌بندی مطالب و آمادگی هرچه بهتر برای آزمون ارتقاء. 🔥 تخفیف‌های ویژه کمپین: ✅ ۵۰٪ تخفیف آزمون‌های الکترونیک ✅ ۴۰٪ تخفیف محتوای صوتی و تصویری ✅ ۳۰٪ تخفیف کتاب‌های الکترونیک ✅ ۲۰٪ تخفیف کتاب‌های چاپی اگر به دنبال یک برنامه‌ریزی هوشمندانه برای مرور، تست‌زنی و جمع‌بندی نهایی هستید، این فرصت را از دست ندهید. ⏳ زمان کمپین محدود است. 🌐برای بهره‌مندی از تخفیفات به

1👎1

1 Jan 2026, 13:38 UTC≈1,080 views0 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🎄✨ سال نو میلادی مبارک ✨🎄 به مناسبت شروع سال جدید، 🎁 تخفیف‌های ویژه سال نو میلادی در سینپ آغاز شد! 📘 ۳۰٪ تخفیف محتوای دیجیتال 📚 ۲۰٪ تخفیف کتاب‌های چاپی 🔥 گرمای تخفیف‌ها در هوای سرد زمستانی ⏳ فرصت محدود — همین حالا استفاده کن 🌐برای بهره‌مندی از تخفیفات به پلتفرم سینپ مراجعه فرمایید. 🔹سینپ 🔺اینستاگرام 〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️ 📌 @Sinatebpub 📞02166902745, 6 📞02166944051, 2

21 Dec 2025, 01:11 UTC944 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🎄✨ از شب یلدایی تا جشن جهانی کریسمس کمپین ویژه یلدا تا کریسمس سینپ شروع شد! 🔥 🎁 ۲۰٪ تخفیف روی کتاب‌های تخصصی پزشکی 📚 بهترین رفرنس‌ها، با قیمت کمتر 🎁 ۲۰٪ تخفیف روی محتواهای دیجیتال آموزشی 🎥 یادگیری حرفه‌ای، هر زمان و هر جا ✨ از یلدا تا کریسمس، دانش پزشکی رو با تخفیف جشن بگیر🤩 ⏰ فرصت محدوده، از دستش نده 🔹سینپ 🔺اینستاگرام 〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️ 📌 @Sinatebpub 📞02166902745, 6 📞02166944051, 2

11 Dec 2025, 11:38 UTC≈3,360 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🎊روز مادر بر تمامی بانوان پزشک گرامی باد.🎊 💙 زنان ارزشمندی که در کنار مسئولیت مقدس مادری، با دانش، صبر و تعهد حرفه‌ای خود نقشی بی‌بدیل در ارتقای سلامت جامعه بر عهده دارند. 👩‍🔬 شما که در سفیدترین لباس دنیا معنای عمیق مادری را دوباره تفسیر می‌کنید؛ با مراقبت‌های دلسوزانه، فداکاری‌های بی‌وقفه و بیداری‌هایی که از جان برمی‌آید. 🗓امروز، روز زنانی است که در خانه و در محیط درمان، نبض آرامش و تکیه‌گاهِ مهربانی‌اند. 🙏تلاش،

1

28 Nov 2025, 15:10 UTC975 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

👁دوره تخصصی اپتیک بالینی 🎯جامع، عملی و علمی 🔵این دوره با حضور جمعی از اساتید برجسته کشور از دانشگاه علوم پزشکی تهران، دانشگاه تهران و بیمارستان فارابی، با هدف ارائه یک آموزش کامل و کاربردی در حوزه اپتیک بالینی طراحی شده است. 🔺محتوا بر اساس تجربه عملی، مباحث علمی روز و نیازهای واقعی کلینیک و بیمارستان ارائه می‌شود. 👨‍⚕️ اساتید دوره: 🔹 دکتر پریسا عبدی – متخصص چشم‌پزشکی و فلوشیپ قرنیه 🔹 دکتر کتایون سماواتی – فیزیکدا

🙏21

28 Nov 2025, 12:50 UTC773 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

🔥دوره‌ی مرجع کامل آنتی‌بیوتیک‌ها برای پزشکان منتشر شد!💊 🎯یک برنامه آموزشی جامع برای یادگیری اصول علمی، بالینی و کاربردی آنتی‌بیوتیک‌ها؛ از مکانیسم‌ها و طیف اثر گرفته تا دوزها، عوارض، تحلیل آنتی‌بیوگرام و مدیریت مقاومت دارویی. 👨‍⚕این دوره با تدریس دکتر مرتضی پوراحمد، متخصص بیماری‌های عفونی و عضو هیئت علمی، دقیقاً بر اساس نیازهای واقعی بالینی طراحی شده و برای پزشکان، رزیدنت‌ها و دانشجویان پزشکی کاملاً کاربردی است. 📌

👌1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Sinatebpub. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 8,304 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Sinateb/سیناطب” (@Sinatebpub), 1,936 subscribers as measured 6 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Sinatebpub.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.