Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Радио Даня 🎤

@Shvol

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

36subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001237517645
TypeChannel
Username@Shvol
DescriptionПоток
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/Shvol

Growth

367 August 2026 — 36 subscribers10 August 2026 — 36 subscribers7 August 202610 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 3 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 35–37 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 22:4636no change
7 Aug 2026, 16:1436first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 15 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
81.8%
avg views ÷ 36 subscribers
Avg views / post
29.4
18 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.76%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
18
of 18 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 4 of 18 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026
Posts held18 (15 July 202610 August 2026)
Views total530
Reactions total6
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken10 Aug 2026, 22:46 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
764
Videos
323
Links
317

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
58s
Average length
58s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

6 reactions across 4 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍350.0%
😭233.3%
🔥116.7%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 15 July 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 18 we hold a reading for · 6%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Shvol. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 18 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 15 July 2026 to 10 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 23:11 UTC18 viewsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @jovanstuffVideo

Мне, короче, прямо прошлой ночью телепатия перестала казаться чем-то особенным. Не научная фантастика, а бытовуха. Не отдаленное будущее, а скоро на Озоне. Может быть не прямо в следующем году, но к 2030 точно будем заказывать пиццу и вызывать такси телепатически. Звучит как ерунда, но нам особо ничего больше не нужно — такси и пицца.

4 Aug 2026, 18:16 UTC32 viewsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @furherring

В биологии известен принцип «Онтогенез повторяет филогенез»: анатомическое развитие животного во многом воспроизводит его эволюционное происхождение. У эмбриона кита есть полноценная шея и задние конечности, которые к моменту рождения становятся рудиментами; у будущего человека формируются зачатки жабр и хвост, но потом они «рассасываются». Индивидуальное развитие мозга человека отражает его, мозга, историческое про

1 Aug 2026, 17:50 UTC35 viewsread 10 August 2026

Завтра иду в вб, мамка там всякого заказала будем мерить 🤗

1 Aug 2026, 11:39 UTC32 views1 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @dvachannelPhoto

В Китае нашли гриб, после которого люди видят гномов и лилипутов — его продают прямо на рынках Гриб Lanmaoa asiatica вызывает необычные галлюцинации: почти все видят ярких трёхмерных крошечных человечков, которые бегают по одежде и посуде, а также забираются в самые неожиданные места. Эффект может длиться несколько дней и проявляется у людей почти одинаково. Несмотря на это, гриб свободно продают на продуктовых рын

👍1

1 Aug 2026, 09:55 UTC27 views3 reactions1 Starread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @sashakon

тем временем, там Татьяна Ким выступила с официальным обращением, которое ЕБАТЬ пугает. пугает оно не тем, что она там говорит, а, хуй знает. ИНТОНАЦИОННО. в нем она выглядит не как крупный бизнесмен, а как самый настоящий государственный функционер федерального масштаба. - Wildberries с первого дня атак ежедневно усиливает линию обороны, используя в том числе инженерные решения и успешно отражает большую часть атак

👍1🔥1😭1

25 Jul 2026, 14:35 UTC31 viewsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @magic_rat_free

Вообще-то, я почти не смотрю сериалы, мне скучно Но вот этот аккуратно вам посоветую, предварительно перечислив теги для фильтрации аудитории: быт, быт, быт, старение, увядание, одиночество, депрессия. Если вы дотягиваетесь ножками до порога фильмов без острых сюжетов, и если клиповое мышление еще не сожгло ваш мозг и вас хватает на медленную картинку, то посмотрите. «Что знает Оливия?» (1 сезон/4 серии) Очень по

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @Shvol. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Радио Даня 🎤” (@Shvol), 36 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Shvol.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.