Channel
@Sage_Flower
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
90subscribers
+18 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002703389396 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Sage_Flower |
| Created | Between 1 June 2025 and 30 September 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 27 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 27 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Sage_Flower |
Art & design — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 27 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 92% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 27 Sept 2026, 03:57 | 90 | +9 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 18:20 | 81 | -1 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 09:26 | 82 | +4 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 21:03 | 78 | +6 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 06:15 | 72 | no change |
| 12 Aug 2026, 06:02 | 72 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 8 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
89 reactions across 14 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5289765486500790431 | 26 | 29.2% | |
| custom 5292271217665916932 | 23 | 25.8% | |
| ❤ | 14 | 15.7% | |
| 💘 | 12 | 13.5% | |
| ❤🔥 | 6 | 6.74% | |
| 🍓 | 2 | 2.25% | |
| 👍 | 2 | 2.25% | |
| 🐳 | 1 | 1.12% | |
| 👌 | 1 | 1.12% | |
| 💔 | 1 | 1.12% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 1.12% |
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 89 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 8 August 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Арт Трейд с Ивой ✦•··········•✦•··········•✦ Красивая кошечка смотрит на звёздочку. Намучилась я конечно с окрасом. Но результат мне нравится. Вопрос: Покажите рисунок который вам больше всего нравится! ✦•··········•✦•··········•✦ #трейд #арт #рисунок
custom 52897654865007904313custom 52922712176659169323❤1💘1
Правила на персонажей. (СТРОГО СОБЛЮДАТЬ) #важное
💘1custom 52897654865007904311custom 52922712176659169321
Отправлять то что предлагаете прямо под этот пост! #щп
💘1custom 52897654865007904311custom 52922712176659169321
АДОПТ ✦•··········•✦•··········•✦ Приор: подарки тгз, персонажи, арты. Анти приор: ворованные/лёгкие персонажи, реклама. Почему?: Этот адопт создан с нуля. Всё аксессуары придуманы мной. Поэтому цена выше чем обычно. ❤️-подумаю 💔-нет По вопросам @SageFlower_Artist ✦•··········•✦•··········•✦ #адопт
❤2🍓1💔1💘1🔥1custom 52897654865007904311custom 52922712176659169321
#Реклама_Коте
❤1
📃📃📃📃📃📃📃📃 от мико вас уже очень много, поэтому очень хочется узнать каждого поближе и поглядеть на ваших персонажей! буду рисовать тех, кто понравится, так, как захочу, в разных форматах!!! ☕️ условия участия: -подписка на мой тгк без отписки -репост в свой тгк/5 друзьям -прислать в комментарии под этим постом персонажей, которых вы бы хотели, чтобы я нарисовали! реквесты актуальны до удаления этого поста, пока он …
❤1
Наверно вы уже догадались что это адопт начатый с нуля ☺️ #щп
custom 52897654865007904313💘2custom 52922712176659169322
🍋Скетч/лайн🫐 ✦•··········•✦•··········•✦ Да я бы тоже ужаснулась увидев скетч. Но что поделать, так рисуется намного легче. Вопрос: Покажите ваш арт и его скетч в комментариях ✦•··········•✦•··········•✦ #арт #скетч #спойлер #рисунок
custom 52897654865007904313💘2custom 52922712176659169322❤1
Трейд 🌱
❤5custom 52897654865007904312🍓1👌1💘1custom 52922712176659169321
Боже не могу какие же они кривые 😂 ✦•··········•✦•··········•✦ Опять те же девчули. Но я не могу, их прям перекосило. Так и хочется самой себе задать вопрос "по ним машина проехала? " 😂 ✦•··········•✦•··········•✦ #арт #кот #скетч #рисунок
custom 52897654865007904316💘2custom 52922712176659169322❤1
Смололика ✦•··········•✦•··········•✦ Расчёт был на то чтобы сделать какую нибудь дерзкую и неукротимую кошку. Она у меня получилась. Быстрый скетч ручкой. Вопрос: Дерзкие персонажи или милые? ✦•··········•✦•··········•✦ #арт #кот #традишка
custom 52897654865007904312custom 52922712176659169322❤1🐳1👍1💘1
Channel photo updated
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @Sage_Flower. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Лесная Поляна Сейдж 🪲🍀” (@Sage_Flower), 90 subscribers as measured 27 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Sage_Flower.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.