Channel name was changed to «рипендря ✸ ажурная кожура инжира»

Channel
рипендря ✸ ажурная кожура инжира
@rypendria
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
1,925subscribers
+111 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001641329541 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @rypendria |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 14 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/rypendria |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 16 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 13:58 | 1,925 | +3 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 08:37 | 1,922 | +51 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 07:56 | 1,871 | -6 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 01:59 | 1,877 | -1 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 15:38 | 1,878 | -8 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 13:25 | 1,886 | -4 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 19:36 | 1,890 | +9 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 02:09 | 1,881 | -2 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 19:02 | 1,883 | -13 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 10:16 | 1,896 | -17 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 11:14 | 1,913 | -4 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 16:31 | 1,917 | +96 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 11:55 | 1,821 | +7 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 14:21 | 1,814 | first reading |
Engagement
11 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 11 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
684 reactions across 10 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 244 | 35.7% | |
| ❤🔥 | 152 | 22.2% | |
| 💘 | 109 | 15.9% | |
| 🍓 | 62 | 9.06% | |
| 💋 | 47 | 6.87% | |
| custom 5388659848680331785 | 44 | 6.43% | |
| 🔥 | 25 | 3.65% | |
| 🎉 | 1 | 0.146% |
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 684 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
ИНЖИРЫ ПОСПЕЛИ!
❤44❤🔥7💋3custom 53886598486803317853🍓2
Signed ˗ˏˋ Miko
сделали себе такой вот бейджик интересуюсь, есть ли у вас какие-то идеи для творческого коллаба? хочу что-то сделать, но не знаю что 🤩🌼 напишите в комментариях свои предложения!
❤🔥70💘24💋13❤9🔥3
Signed ˗ˏˋ Miko
теперь я состою в ферал-антро папке художников!!! меня добавили туда @newshamoon и @Kellyart <3 🤩ссылочка на папку - https://t.me/addlist/ShR-7Rz0nVw0ODAy 🍵инфоченел для ознакомления с условиями: @feral_antro_papka по вопросам добавления к @kelly_arts
❤30💋6custom 53886598486803317854❤🔥1
Signed ˗ˏˋ Miko
Posted without readable text
❤15💋5❤🔥3
Signed ˗ˏˋ Miko
🏺🏺🏺🏺 вчера меня снова спросили, какими кистями я пользуюсь и я поняли, что дальше так продолжаться не может, нужно наконец-то ими поделиться! некоторые из них я сделали сами (например, rypendria's lineart), некоторые не моего авторства просто найдены когда-то на просторах интернета, некоторые найдены на просторах интернета и подкручены мной. захотелось все вместе собрать, пользуйтесь на здоровье! 🤩
🍓43❤16💋7💘3❤🔥1
Signed ˗ˏˋ Miko
старый долг для риши 🌜
❤60🔥14custom 538865984868033178513❤🔥9💘3🎉1💋1
Signed ˗ˏˋ Miko
🖊 артфайт подошел к концу, поэтому хочется сказать пару слов о нем и о моем опыте в этом году. 🍰 ➖🌊этот артфайт был для меня самым продуктивным, хотя я были загружены больше всего и, казалось бы, времени на рисование практически не было, но, все-таки, умудрялись что-то рисовать. за этот месяц у меня получилось 103 рисунка, а мне нарисовали 71!!! я просто в восторге! каждый рисунок можно посмотреть в моем тгк с рисун…
💘30❤🔥14❤9🔥5custom 53886598486803317855💋3🍓2
Signed ˗ˏˋ Miko
отдельно показываю трейд с тюбиком очень нравится как получилось
💘47❤14custom 53886598486803317858🍓5💋1🔥1
Signed ˗ˏˋ Miko
вторая партия сегодняшних рисунков
❤35❤🔥12custom 53886598486803317859🍓5💋1💘1🔥1
Signed ˗ˏˋ Miko
сегодняшние рисунки
❤🔥35❤12💋7🍓5custom 53886598486803317852💘1🔥1
Signed ˗ˏˋ Miko
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @rypendria. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
@DaVesik4 · 1351 postЛесная Поляна Сейдж 🪲🍀
@Sage_Flower · 901 postКриминальное кафе
@brightkaf · 781 postПодвал Дениса .рест
@miso_art · 1621 postволчья горка𓃡
@murrrksss · 1,3951 postЛисячья нора ✷
@redfoxii · 2261 postШурка чирикает
@struh_eye · 241 postִֶָ. ..˙𐃷˙ Apple wolf 𓂃 ࣪.𝄢.⋆🐾° ִֶָ་༘࿐
@wolfcatsnake · 511 post
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 71 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 23 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@nyankatua · 882 postscrowan
@rowancrow · 2402 postsАллергия на отсутствие кошек
@allergytotheabsenceofcats · 1561 postКактусббг хочет панини 🥪
@Cactussbbg · 1101 post.●◖𐌿ρ᧐ᥴᴛᥲя Կᥱᥔɜᥙ◗
@ChasyDraws · 911 postТемный Урзик
@clowntsmop · 901 postGrey Bastard 🐬🏒
@Grey_Bastardd · 9441 postЧасть чего-то большего
@gruppa_heritor · 1,5641 postобщина поклонения фемцелищам аля боги кукурузного поля на Варшаве
@Gryshadyra · 1061 postпєрєходничок хао!3
@haodeyechi · 651 post⛧ⲕ𐔤᥈ьⲧ ⳝᥱⳅⲇⲏы⛧
@i_nudor · 1021 postKl1kCa.XxD
@Kl1kCaXxd · 411 postMESEYUKIII🪬
@Messskiii · 2171 post🌙MidN
@MidN1gha · 1301 postmirii
@miriforest · 1411 postLiar, liar, pants on fire!
@NaoRy_labb · 291 postOreshka
@oreshkacats · 7411 postПоле Пшеницы||Pshenichka
@PshenichkaArts · 811 postСаняСинь околонебесная
@sanyaxin · 3031 postCompassion
@star_334_star · 1011 postРыбина
@troutowo · 1471 post✶ 。,, 𖡼 ᙐദёӡᗪⴼഠᙓ πഠδഠⵍɯᙓ 𖦹 °‧
@VeshalkaiKruchock · 2631 post𝕾i𝖕𝖆
@vik7646 · 271 post
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 1
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 0
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@rypendria named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Evidenced gone
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026 · confirmed gone 19 August 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“рипендря ✸ ажурная кожура инжира” (@rypendria), 1,925 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/rypendria.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.