Channel
@Sadafspage
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
93subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002310494365 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Sadafspage |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Sadafspage |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 22:11 | 93 | -1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 22:45 | 94 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 12 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 3 of 4 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 18 (12 June 2026 – 4 August 2026) |
| Views total | 192 |
| Reactions total | 11 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 10 Aug 2026, 22:45 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
13 reactions across 4 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 13 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 13reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 12 June 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Butun ummat jamlanib sizga qandaydir manfaat yetkazmoqchi bo‘lsa, Alloh bitganidan boshqasini yetkaza olmaydi. Shuning uchun boshqalarning yordamiga tayanmang. Butun ummat jamlanib zarar keltirmoqchi bo‘lsa, Alloh sizga bitganidan boshqasini keltira olmaydi. Shuning uchun boshqalardan qo‘rqmang. Qanday musibat yetsa, shu xayrlisi ekan, deb qo‘yavering. Odamlar qasd qilsa ham, baribir boshqa tomondan bo‘ladi. Shu taq…
❤2
لَا حَوْلَ وَلَا قُوَّةَ إِلَّا بِاللَّهِ الْعَلِيِّ الْعَظِيمِ🫀✨
• Hech bir tarixda qolgan ayol zo'r ovqat pishirib, uyni har kuni takror tozalab qo'ygani uchun eslanmaydi. Barchasi ilmi sabab tarbiya qilgan farzandi, donoligi sabab qilgan qarorlari haqida so'zlanadi. • Maoshi bu dunyoda va u dunyoda ham mukammal bo’luvchi muallimalik bu onaning farzandlariga bergan ilmidadir.
❤5
“Ogoh bo‘lingki, tanada bir parcha go‘sht bor. Agar u sog‘lom bo‘lsa, butun tana sog‘lom bo‘ladi. Agar u buzilsa, butun tana buziladi. Ogoh bo‘lingki, u qalbdir.” (Imom Buxoriy rivoyati)
❤4
Qur’ondagi harflar soni — 323 671 Ibn Mas’ud roziyallohu anhudan rivoyat qilinadi. Nabiy salallohu alayhi vassalam dedilar: «Kim Qur’ondan bir harf o‘qisa, unga bir yaxshilik yoziladi. Har bir yaxshilik esa o‘n barobar qilib beriladi. Men “Alif, Lom, Mim” bitta harf demayman. Balki “Alif” bir harf, “Lom” bir harf va “Mim” bir harfdir». (Sahih Termiziy, 2910) 323 671 × 10 = 3 236 710 Bir o‘ylab ko‘ring: Qur’onni …
Juda kech tushungan holatlar. 1. Ayb, ko’rganniki. 2. Muammo, savol berganniki. 3. Ko’z faqat o’zi xohlaganini ko’radi. 4. Ota-ona omonat. Olimlar undan ham omonatroq. 5. Biror odamga baho berishchalik boshga balo chaqiradigan ish yo’q. 6. Bolalar tez katta bo’ladi. 7. Izlagan topadi. Aynan nimani izlasa o’shani topadi. M.H.
❤2
Sening quling ekanim Azizlikka kifoya. Mening Robbim ekaning obro'larga nihoya🤍
Agar hayotingizda so‘zlarsiz nigohlardan tushunadigan insonni topsangiz, ruhingiz jannatni topibdi… 🤍 O‘ylab qarasak, hayotga bo‘lgan aqidalari bir-biriga mos bo‘lgan insonlar ham bir-birini tushunmasliklari, yoki aksincha, hayotga turlicha dunyoqarash bilan qaraydigan insonlar bir-birlarini juda yaxshi tushunishlari mumkin. Munosabatlarda eng muhimi — bir-birini tushunish. Bu xoh ota-ona bilan bo‘lgan aloqalarda b…
Qancha ko’tarilishni istasang, shuncha pasayishing kerak. Olgan ilming, seni insonlardan ustun ko’rishga majbur qilmasligi kerak. Agar ilming sabab o’zingni ustun ko’rsang, Alloh seni yana o’sha zalolatga uloqtirib yuboradi. Bir paytlar ibodatda iblisga teng keladigani yo’q edi. Olgan ilmi, uni la’natlanishdan va Jahannamdan qutqarib qololmadi. Nega? Chunki u pasayish o’rniga ko’tarilishni istadi. So’ng Alloh uni s…
Hayotning keng-gu tor ko‘chalarida, Rejalar tuzamiz kechalarida, Rejalar ichida o‘lim yo‘q. Ammo Biz bormiz o‘limning rejalarida. O’tkir Hoshimov
Bir odam o‘zining xotiniga oshiq ekan. Bir muxbir ayol ma’shuqa xotin bilan gaplashyapti: - Bunga qanday erishdingiz? Go‘zalligingiz bilanmi? Pazandaligingiz bilanmi? Ko‘p bola tug‘ish bilanmi? Nima bilan? - Oiladagi totuvlik, baxt, avvalo, Allohning tavfiqi bilan, qolaversa, ayolning zukkoligi bilan bo‘ladi. Mol-davlat ham, pazandalik ham, serfarzandlik ham ish bermaydi. Qanchadan-qancha boy ayollardan erlari bezor…
Ota Onaning taqvosi bolada namoyon bo’ladi. Buxoriyni faqat Buxoriyning onasidek bo’la olganlar dunyoga keltira oladi. “DADA” deganda bolangizning ko’z o’ngida sigaret chekib TV ko’rayotgan bir bekorchi kishi gavdalanayotgan ekan farzandingizdan Buxoriylar chiqishini hayol ham qilmang. “ONA” deganda ertalabdan kechkacha telefon titkilab, soatlab dugonalari bilan laqqillab gaplashib turadigan bir ayol bolangizni ko’…
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @Sadafspage. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 893,710 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Sadaf’s blog” (@Sadafspage), 93 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Sadafspage.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.