Channel
@Ahtam_qizi
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
2,578subscribers
+117 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1002055499634 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Ahtam_qizi |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Ahtam_qizi |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Aug 2026, 11:16 | 2,578 | +35 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 07:07 | 2,543 | -32 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 11:17 | 2,575 | +124 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 21:12 | 2,451 | -4 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 22:51 | 2,455 | -6 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 05:35 | 2,461 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 02:37 | 2,461 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 15 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 8 of 15 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (15 July 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 33,902 |
| Reactions total | 0 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 17:36 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Ahtam_qizi. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 15 July 2026 to 6 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Ko‘pchilik kuzatayotgan narsani kuzatib, ko‘pchilikdan boshqacha fikrlab bo‘lmaydi. Ko‘pchilik ko‘rayotgan narsani ko‘rib, kamchilik erishadigan natijaga chiqib bo‘lmaydi. “Nima yesak, o‘shamiz,” degandi Ibn Xaldun. “Nima ko‘rsak, o‘shamiz,” qo‘shib ketadi zamonimiz. Aziz Rahimov
Boy bo'ling — isrof qilmang. Chiroyli ekan — ko'rsatmang. Aqqlimisiz — kamtar bo'ling. Gunoh bormi — tavba qiling. Ne'mat bormi — shukur qiling. Sinov yetdimi — sabr qiling. Ilm oldingizmi — amal qiling. ©Fikrlog
Nega biz koʻp holatlarda muammoni yechimini topishni emas, asl ildizini bilishni istaymiz? Bir muammo paydo boʻldi. Asli kim qilgan, nima boʻlgan, kim aybdor hammasini bilishni xohlaymiz. Lekin yechim topguncha shunchaki vaqt yoʻqotamiz. Ayniqsa tan olish kerakki erkaklarga nisbatan ayollarda bu holat koʻp kuzatiladi. Muammoning sababini bilish har doim ham foyda bermaydi. Ko‘pchiligimizning eng katta xatomiz shu…
Tasavvurga sigʻdirish qiyin a...
Sinab koʻring.
Havas qiladigan insoningiz 2 ta boʻlsin! 1. Ilm olib, tarqatayotgan inson! Unda ham insonni oʻziga emas, tarqatayotgan ilmiga havas qiling! 2. Boy boʻlgan, va boyligini yaxshi ishlarga safarbar qilayotgan inson! Unda ham insonga emas, qilayotgan yaxshi ishlariga! #suhbatdan
Tafakkur qilish uchun olis manzillarga borishimiz shart emas... Biz ko‘pincha qayergadir safar qilsak, qaysidir davlatga borsak, dengizlar-u okeanlarni, hayvonlarni, dunyo moʻjizalarini koʻrsakgina tafakkur qilaman, deb o‘ylaymiz. Vaholanki, tafakkur uzoq va mashaqqatli safarlardan emas, balki qalbning gʻaflatdan uygʻongan joyidan boshlanadi. Mo‘minning eng go‘zal va yuksak sifatlaridan biri - U Zotning oyat-belgi…
– Siz bir odamni qancha kuttirsangiz, unga siz haqingizda yomon narsalarni o’ylashiga shuncha ko’p imkoniyat yaratib berasiz. – Kimning oldida tilingiz uzaysa, o’sha odamning qalbidagi umringiz kamayar ekan. – Chiroyli gapira oladigan odam yaxshi suhbatdosh emas, balki juda ham yaxshi boshqaruvchi. M.H
Chuqur o‘ylovchi aql va yumshoq qalb sohibi bo‘lganlarga og‘ir... Ular hech bir harakatni va hech bir so‘zni oddiy qabul qila olishmaydi. — Taimaa Sattar
VOZ KECH Bunday odamlardan, vaziyatlardan va fikrlardan. ©MUSLIM HOLDAROV
Boshqalar sizni hurmat qilishini xohlasangiz: - Belgilangan uchrashuvga vaqtida boring. Kechikayotgan bo’lsangiz oldindan ogohlantiring - Masalahat so’rab kelishsa, yashirmasdan chin ko’ngildan bering - Menga nima foyda emas, mendan nima foyda deb yashang. - Matohingizni ko’z-ko’z qilib faqatgina matohi yo’qlarni hayron qoldirasiz. - “Bilmayman” deyishni odat qiling - Agar xohlamasangiz “yo’q” deyishni o’rganin…
Gapiruvchining gʻayrati tinglovchilarning fahmi miqdorichadir. Himmating oʻlishini istamasang, soʻzingga ragʻbat qiluvchigagina gapir. Xotibul Bagʻdodiy Har bir soʻzning ham oʻz egasi bor. Hikmatni uni qadrlaydigan insonga aytish kerak. Chunki tinglashni istamaydigan insonga aytilgan eng goʻzal nasihat ham taʼsir qilmaydi, aksincha, soʻzlovchining ham gʻayrati soʻnishiga sabab boʻladi. Gapimizni uni qadrlaydigan, …
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Ahtam_qizi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 234,013 of 1,565,402entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Ahtam qizi ✨” (@Ahtam_qizi), 2,578 subscribers as measured 19 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Ahtam_qizi.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.