Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

上海银梦|福利视频|硅胶娃娃

@ey6662

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

4,216subscribers

+395 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003902494894
TypeChannel
Username@ey6662
CreatedBetween 1 April 2026 and 19 July 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/ey6662

Growth

3,8214,2164,018.56 August 2026 — 3,821 subscribers6 August 2026 — 3,821 subscribers7 August 2026 — 3,845 subscribers10 August 2026 — 4,216 subscribers6 August 202610 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 4 days, net +395. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,762–4,275 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 10:414,216+371
7 Aug 2026, 05:533,845+24
6 Aug 2026, 22:453,821no change
6 Aug 2026, 22:393,821first reading

Engagement

8 posts held, back to 19 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 4 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
31.5%
avg views ÷ 4,216 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,330
8 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.147%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
8
of 8 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 4 of 8 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 August 2026
Posts held8 (19 July 20264 August 2026)
Views total10,635
Reactions total8
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 06:01 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
2m 27s
Average length
25s

Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

8 reactions across 4 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 87.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
787.5%
👍112.5%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 8reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 19 July 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

4 Aug 2026, 15:38 UTC535 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

硅胶娃娃【成都银梦】 8月4号成都银梦首店,位置:四川省成都市武侯区佳灵路20号九峰国际A栋 匠心打造,用的1.5w铂金硅胶娃娃,认准银梦只做精品全部店铺实拍一镜到底不踩坑。 客服V:yinmeng3332 成都频道 @cdym3 成都群聊 @CDYM0 成都客服 @cdym04_bot ————————————— 上海客服 @ey6669bot 上海群聊 @ey6667 --------------------------------- 另外导航目录每个区域成都同行【人工审核验店】后可以免费上榜 初来乍到 互利共赢 曝光/上榜合作的联系 @ey6669bot #成都 #硅胶娃娃 #新奇体验店

3

3 Aug 2026, 06:40 UTC670 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

硅胶娃娃【上海银梦】 8月3号订货成都 给兄弟感受一下 液体硅胶老毕做工 一比一仿真 满足兄弟们所有的想象 顶级材质 顶级质感 顶级做工 顶级体验 高端品牌有一说一是牛逼!!! 聊天群 @ey6667 #硅胶娃娃 #上海 #成人体验馆

2

30 Jul 2026, 09:16 UTC≈1,190 viewsread 8 August 2026
Video

🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 硅胶娃娃【成都银梦】 兄弟们我们来成都啦:后续会加快上新成都店铺 感谢兄弟们支持 还是安装我们以往的规定不做一次客 只做回头客 7月30号实拍郫都区红光街道红高东路340号 展示其他头雕的一镜到底 产品很多样 成都群聊 @CDYM0 成都频道 @cdym3 成都双向 @cdym04_bot 成都专属人工 @cdym3 #成都 #成人娃娃 #硅胶体验馆 #新奇体验馆

29 Jul 2026, 10:50 UTC≈1,250 viewsread 8 August 2026
Video

硅胶娃娃【上海银梦】7月29号 新到的ia语音 各种声优 声控功能 云感材质 粉嫩下体 聊天群入口 @ey6667 #上海 #硅胶娃娃 #成人体验馆

21 Jul 2026, 08:29 UTC≈2,060 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

硅胶娃娃【上海银梦】 7月21号嘉定日月光新到铂金液体硅胶一个,我亲自检验开箱!!! 舒服啊 一流啊! 手指插进去都想射! 液体硅胶就是顶级!! 崭新 想玩的兄弟们速度冲 聊天群 @ey6667 #硅胶娃娃 #上海 #成人体验馆

👍1

19 Jul 2026, 15:53 UTC≈2,180 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

今天体验了一次牛牛哥新到的娃娃,我也是第一次见液体硅胶的材质娃娃,那个胸摸起来就和真的一样软绵,皮肤还显血管脉络。 进门第一眼看到的就是床上的这个娃娃,一小时就干了三发出去,小穴,屁穴轮流交替插。 双腿夹紧致使逼穴都跟着挤压,好几次牛牛没插进去滑出来😂 娃娃的材质极佳,出片的美感也是一流,极致享受了

2

Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @ey6662. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 177,354 of 1,183,361entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“上海银梦|福利视频|硅胶娃娃” (@ey6662), 4,216 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ey6662.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.