Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for شعر شعبي عراقي

Channel

شعر شعبي عراقي

@SSS_SO0

On this record: Topic · Observations · Channels linked by matching posts · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

52,128subscribers

+2,366 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002146491460
TypeChannel
Username@SSS_SO0
Descriptionالقناة الرسمية على التلكرام 🔝✔ استمتــع بـــــالمـشاهدة •┊اشعار •┊اقتباسات •┊فيديوهات •┊قصائد @llSUI .
CreatedBetween 1 December 2023 and 30 April 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 November 2026
Measurements held63
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/SSS_SO0

Topic

Literature — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 81% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 3 other registered channels. This entry also sits inside a group of 5 channels linked by matching posts, directly or through other channels in the group; two members of the group may share no posts with each other. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@SSS_SO0/2772 · this entry16 Jul 2026, 18:00 UTC@sh3riraq/16306614 Aug 2026, 13:13 UTC1.0029 days
@SSS_SO0/2782 · this entry23 Jul 2026, 19:00 UTC@sh3riraq/16306714 Aug 2026, 13:13 UTC1.0022 days
@SSS_SO0/2844 · this entry5 Sept 2026, 17:00 UTC@sh3riraq/1632528 Sept 2026, 22:13 UTC1.003 days
@SSS_SO0/2845 · this entry5 Sept 2026, 17:00 UTC@sh3riraq/1632538 Sept 2026, 22:13 UTC1.003 days
@SSS_SO0/2847 · this entry5 Sept 2026, 17:00 UTC@sh3riraq/1632558 Sept 2026, 22:13 UTC1.003 days
@SSS_SO0/2879 · this entry27 Sept 2026, 21:00 UTC@sh3riraq/16350818 Oct 2026, 18:55 UTC1.0021 days
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@sh3riraq15 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0010 daysthis entry (15–0)
@Alkatah5 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.9711 daysthis entry (5–0)
@LarFeU5 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0015 hoursthis entry (5–0)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 0 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 60 comparable posts for this entry, running 16 July 2026 to 5 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Of the group of 5 channels, the one whose matching posts we hold earliest is @SSS_SO0 — which is this entry. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the key clone_source, last confirmed 11 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Channels linked by matching posts

This channel is in a group of 5 registered channels linked by matching posts, directly or through other channels in the group. This channel may share no posts with some of the channels listed below, and listed channels may share none with each other. Links are found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown in this list. “First” could only mean first in our own crawl, which depends on how deep we happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. Our one hand-check read 45 of the highest-confidence flagged pairs against the live Telegram pages. In 18 of them the live page showed a “Forwarded from” credit that our database had no record of, so reading that pair as an unattributed copy was wrong; the check did not measure who published first. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Near-verbatim matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

48,05552,64250,348.552,1287 August 202611 November 2026
63 measurements spanning 96 days, net +2,366. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 47,367–53,330 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 63
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Nov 2026, 14:0052,128+25
9 Nov 2026, 16:3852,103-40
8 Nov 2026, 10:5152,143+6
7 Nov 2026, 03:0952,137-57
6 Nov 2026, 04:1952,194-2
5 Nov 2026, 07:2752,196-82
4 Nov 2026, 04:5552,278-21
3 Nov 2026, 06:4952,299-65
2 Nov 2026, 06:3952,364-54
1 Nov 2026, 09:0952,418-7
31 Oct 2026, 07:0952,425-50
30 Oct 2026, 09:2852,475-98
29 Oct 2026, 10:1752,573-5
28 Oct 2026, 11:3152,578-35
27 Oct 2026, 09:5052,613-29
26 Oct 2026, 07:1152,642+84
25 Oct 2026, 03:5052,558-42
24 Oct 2026, 01:4752,600+200
23 Oct 2026, 02:4852,400+68
22 Oct 2026, 00:5752,332first reading

Engagement

82 posts held, back to 16 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 200 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
18.3%
avg views ÷ 52,128 subscribers
Avg views / post
9,540
28 posts measured
Reaction rate
0%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
28
of 82 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 4 of 28 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 November 2026
Posts held82 (16 July 2026 – 5 November 2026)
Views total267,020
Reactions total0
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Nov 2026, 06:39 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
117
Videos
37
Links
7

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
44
across the posts below
Posts paid on
6
of 82 we hold a reading for · 7%
Most on one post
39
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @SSS_SO0. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 82 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 16 July 2026 to 5 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 3 of 28 posts held from the last 30 days (10.7%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

5 Nov 2026, 21:00 UTC≈4,680 views0 reactions1 Starread 12 November 2026

هويتَك والخضار البيه مد الشوفَ وگطعت الماي عنه وهَل بقه صحره أهي افضاله عمر چم يوم ومغربيَن ليش أكضيهن ابأهات وبحسَره؟ اريد اللي يحبني برايه والوجدان ونعيَش شفاف موش عيونه الحَمره ليَش تگلي اريدك وانتَ غيري تريد؟ تخليني محَطه وبيه تنتضره أثارينيَ بعيد وحلَمك أنتَ بعيد أنا العشره الطويَله وعشرتك فتره يبس جذع الوقه ومَات الورك والطير حد فاسد بَعد ما خايف الطبره أنا بفتره غرامك كلشي ما خليت يعت كل اليغثَك الخاطر العُشره…

3 Nov 2026, 16:00 UTC≈6,530 viewsread 12 November 2026

وحده مِن الثنين ، و وحده راح أختار " لو كِلك أحبَّك ، لو أحِب كِلك " اسأل ليش أحبّك حَتّى اكلك لِيش وليش شما تسوي وياي أقبلّك لحظة موت عُمري سنيني كلهِن خوف بس وياك أمن لمن اوصلك وأنتَ آخر نفس وشكد عزيز تصير وبلحظة الموت تريدنَا نملّك؟ خيط على الجَرح باللحم صرتِ وياي لو كِل الجروح تطيب ما أفلَك ..

31 Oct 2026, 10:12 UTC≈9,340 views0 reactions1 Starread 12 November 2026

شِلتك عُود يابس شارد من النار ويوم الخضرت تِنكر فَضل طيني

29 Oct 2026, 17:00 UTC≈10,600 viewsread 12 November 2026

صَبرني تَرة أَحتاجَك و بَس حِضنَك يصَبرني .

29 Oct 2026, 17:00 UTC≈9,590 viewsread 12 November 2026

ارد اسألچ بَس سؤال وهاي هيه ليش مَاصرتي وفيه ليش گلبي بَس الچ چان وانتي گلبچ مو اليه انه كلبي مو كتل نفسه عليچ ليش ما متي عليه وليش حلقة مُحب بيدچ وانه بعدج امي ما تلزم أديه بس طلعتي انتي رخِيصه وهاي هيه . فراس صادق

29 Oct 2026, 17:00 UTC≈9,210 viewsread 12 November 2026

اچلب بيك مره يجوز مرتِين بس الثالثه تكلفك وجودي يلحارك اعصَابي وباقي وياك وغيرك حارگ الدنيا اعلمودي وثلاجة الموته تحسه تموز انا مَا انصحك تجرب برودي! علي حداد

29 Oct 2026, 17:00 UTC≈8,410 viewsread 12 November 2026

ما حَنيت ؟ شلون ايامي تنساهَن عيونك من يمرهن خوف مو چنت ابچي ويَاهن ! التفاصيل العـشتها وياي صعَب يم غيري تلگاهن . حمزه ال اركان

29 Oct 2026, 17:00 UTC≈7,920 viewsread 12 November 2026

چنت أسولفلك غزل كلما حچيت وأنتَ كل سوالفك عن الرحِيل وچنت تچرحني بـ كلامك وانه أكول كلشي يتحمَل أبو الخلگ الطويل .. كاظم اسماعيل الكاطع

29 Oct 2026, 17:00 UTC≈7,750 viewsread 12 November 2026

برودك صاير بگد ضعفي وياك وانه شايل حرارة دم هواديد أزدواجي وفوضويتك ذبحت الشُوگ تگص جفوفي وتنزل العناگِيد ورا كل ماگلتلي انطيني كَتلك هاگ لحد ماگام كلبگ مدري شيريد .. حسين محمد

Showing the 12 most recent of 82 posts we hold for @SSS_SO0. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Posts edited after publishing

@SSS_SO0 edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
28 September 2026
Most recent edit
28 September 2026

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 8 posts on @SSS_SO0 as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
7 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
3 November 2026
Median time before seen missing
3 days
Seen missing in the last 30 days
3

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

مَشاعر ‌.
@on_ng · 94,736
#1
حُطام .
@c8cg0 · 4,369
#2
- زَيْنُ العابِدِينَ .
@ZXIIXU · 10,006
#3
مُـرثيـات
@ghudfgytd · 2,177
#4
جهاد التبيين
@ee_vbc · 1,329
#5
حَـزن گلبي .
@Z00Z01 · 10,371
#6
✨
@danah146 · 367
#7
لــنفسي
@YIGCRT · 4,202
#8
عرآقي ڪلِش
@hzhzhz8z · 1,548
#9
زَهرة
@GD16k · 14,829
#10
🌞
@Cool_7g · 5,155
#11
تعَىٰ نشرب سِيجاره
@szovl · 11,208
#12
شـهَد
@llQClll · 1,922
#13
Wiśtfuł
@Y_QIl · 416
#14
RaSuL .
@iioc7 · 34
#15
.
@j6f56 · 419 (as read 25 August 2026)
#16
علي وليد
@vvvvfll · 75,832
#17
تكسير الإكسير
@shabohte · 9,963
#18
ابن بغداد
@XG_64 · 88,465 (as read 25 August 2026)
#19
أخبار الفوركس(Forex NEWS)🥇تداول
@U_1_20 · 1,369
#20
سُبطين أحَمد
@Hi5nn · 3,381
#21
Antares
@FYYAF · 4,724
#22
إطمِئنَانْ
@IILOIII11 · 646
#23
سَبتمبر ∞ .
@hmd2m · 11,616
#24
𝘼
@x8f82 · 857 (as read 25 August 2026)
#25
لـ ﮼صادق ✨🫀.
@ch2005ch · 1,619
#26
لـِ مارس
@mmaarrss315 · 1,369
#27
١٤٢٢ۿہ.
@ll8rsj · 873
#28
All •
@UTITV · 4,572
#29
๋࣭ 𝖲𝗇𝗂𝗇𝗂𝗇𝗀 𝖲𝗍𝖺𝗋 .𔓕 ݁.
@lierll · 803
#30
مَرثيات .
@nl3lln · 118,029
#31
وكالة واحد أخبار
@one_news2026 · 90,823
#32
شوية من كلشي✨
@MAANA6 · 7,951
#33
اشعار
@HeB1H1 · 91,831
#34
القـرأن آلكـريـم
@yo_9o · 12,074
#35
محبين أهل البيت عليهم السلام
@dhhsu2 · 160
#36
S2
@ixd21 · 3,512
#37
نسمات قرآنية
@ff313n · 28,385
#38
ابو شعــــر 😏.
@yosfq16 · 1,501
#39
ميمز المهندز
@m9roil · 1,435
#40
lsHadow
@Hadowsh · 3,439
#41
متجر زهـو 🎬
@Dhffsbbxfn · 295
#42
يہوٌنٍيہوٌ♥️🎼
@maryem20056 · 119
#43
ميمز - memes
@errzzl · 475,907
#44
𝗵𝘂𝘀𝘀𝗲𝗶𝗻 𝗮𝗹𝗶
@ZOl96 · 501
#45
عـباس، 🖤
@z70zit · 285
#46

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 25 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

شعر شعبي ، اقتباسات ، اغاني
@sadyona · 19,716
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 28 September 2026
شعر شعبي عراقي
@sh3riraq · 91,413
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 17 August 2026
شعر شعبي عراقي
@OOOO_O0 · 106,323
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 14 August 2026
قرآن || 𝐐𝐔𝐑𝐀𝐍
@iiuuum · 28,703
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 41 here — alongside 40 others — read 22 September 2026
اخبار وزارة التربية | ابن بابل
@iraedo · 204,911
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 11 August 2026
القرأن طريقي🤎🍂
@MV0MV · 39,494
Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 30 August 2026
الامام الحسين{ع}ستوريات حسينيه
@Q3QQR · 47,231
Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 25 August 2026

This channel appears in 7 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“شعر شعبي عراقي” (@SSS_SO0), 52,128 subscribers as measured 11 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/SSS_SO0.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.