Channel name was changed to «WRP : CLOSE»

Channel
WRP : CLOSE
@WesternRoleplayers
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
6,972subscribers
+15 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001208119621 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @WesternRoleplayers |
| Description | Read these fellows! @CommunionWRP. Current active bot: @ Affiliated To: @WestRPMenfess @WetlandByWrp @SplashNewsRP @WrpNsfw. Anonymous Tells: tellonym.me/WesternRoleplayers. Group chat: t.me/+UGaN_nIzepEwZThl. |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/WesternRoleplayers |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 21:28 | 6,972 | +13 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:38 | 6,959 | +2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 18:45 | 6,957 | first reading |
Engagement
101 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 10 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 2.51%
- avg views ÷ 6,972 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 175
- 98 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 4.02%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 101
- of 101 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 32 of 98 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 101 (6 August 2026 – 10 August 2026) |
| Views total | 17,127 |
| Reactions total | 232 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 02:33 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈68,600
- Videos
- ≈1,120
- Links
- ≈35,100
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Reaction mix
232 reactions across 32 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 64.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🍓 | 150 | 64.7% | |
| 🕊 | 82 | 35.3% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 32 of the 101 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 232reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 101 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Sticker, posted without a caption
Signed Stenly.
Aight, the lamps dim time to steps back from the gate, dust settling, signals fading into a soft hum. Shift’s done for me today. Thank you for drifting through, for the steady hands, for every bio sent clean and true, kindly check our community @CommunionWRP, and here all of our partners @WestRPMenfess, @WrpNsfw, @WetlandByWrp, @SplashNewsRp May each of you walk off with your own trophy glinting in the late light, r…
Signed Stenly.
new driendss @pulserra
🕊5🍓4
Signed Stenly.
Where's my new pals? @haverntz
🍓2🕊1
Signed Stenly.
I’m pretty easy to talk to, and once we start chatting, there’s a good chance we’ll end up talking about everything and nothing at all. Whether you’re looking for a new bestie, sibling, or simply someone to talk to, I’d love to get to know you. If you feel like we’d get along, text me and I’ll be excited to hear from you @rollercoasteerr 🧸✨
🍓1
Signed Stenly.
i believe the time for me to expand my social circle has come, so here i am
Signed Stenly.
Be my new pals? @infurative
Signed Stenly.
⠀ ⠀ unlatched constellation 🪷 ꣑ৎ (@noctiveIIes) delicate plumage trembling of sincerity. ⠀ “flourisheth in solitude, yet cherishest the hope of companionship.” ⠀ ⠀
Signed Stenly.
Any new mates here?
Signed Stenly.
all i know is that silence sometimes haunts and mocks us in the most ridiculous way possible. that's why i'm trying to set this loneliness free by stepping out from my comfort zone, and seek for more peers to indulge in a conversation together. i may not have a ton to bring to the table but i'll love listening to your stories like they're the best part of my day, making it feels like catching up with an old friend. a…
🍓2
Signed Stenly.
Cool innit??? Hype them upppp, lads!
Signed Stenly.
Showing the 12 most recent of 101 posts we hold for @WesternRoleplayers. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 226,061 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 14 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@deerliest · 4762 postsFOUTENROUS.
@FOUTENROUS · 252 posts𝐌𝐀𝐋𝐄𝐅𝐈𝐂
@MALEFICCOFC · 122 postsSOUTHSIDE.
@OFCSOUTHSIDE · 162 posts𝐏𝐀𝐏𝐈𝐋𝐋𝐎𝐍𝐒 𝐃𝐄 𝐍𝐔𝐈𝐓.
@papillonsdenuit · 522 posts𝐬𝐚𝐧𝐜𝐭𝐮𝐚𝐫𝐲
@sanctuery · 582 posts𝗧𝗛𝗘 𝗦𝗢𝗖𝗜𝗘𝗧𝗬
@ofcsociety · 91 post𝗩𝗼𝗶𝗹𝗲 𝗱𝗲 𝗣𝗼𝗿𝗰𝗲𝗹𝗮𝗶𝗻𝗲
@porcelaire · 4211 postRAJENDRA FAMS
@rjndrfams · 281 post serenità.
@seirenita · 2171 post𝐓𝐑𝐄𝐒𝐓𝐀𝐍𝐔𝐒
@trestanus · 291 post𝑹𝒆̂𝒗𝒆𝒔 𝒆𝒏 𝑹𝒐𝒔𝒆
@veIvethorn · 1881 postch mati
@vellichorgangs · 181 postwoxley forra club
@woxley · 271 post
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“WRP : CLOSE” (@WesternRoleplayers), 6,972 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/WesternRoleplayers.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.