Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for SEO Fuel (SEO, iGaming, PBN, дроп домени)

Channel

SEO Fuel (SEO, iGaming, PBN, дроп домени)

@SEODropLab

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

450subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002108932410
TypeChannel
Username@SEODropLab
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/SEODropLab

Growth

450451450.56 August 2026 — 451 subscribers6 August 2026 — 451 subscribers14 August 2026 — 450 subscribers6 August 202614 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 8 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 450–451 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 14:05450-1
6 Aug 2026, 19:16451no change
6 Aug 2026, 08:18451first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 20 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
64.7%
avg views ÷ 450 subscribers
Avg views / post
291
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.63%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 16 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 3 of 4 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 July 2026
Posts held16 (20 May 202628 July 2026)
Views total1,164
Reactions total15
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 19:16 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

84 reactions across 14 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 22.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1922.6%
🤝1720.2%
👀1517.9%
👍1315.5%
😁1113.1%
👏44.76%
🌚22.38%
🤔22.38%
🔥11.19%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 84reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 20 May 2026 to 28 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

28 Jul 2026, 06:45 UTC205 views6 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Google трясе третій тиждень поспіль: нова хвиля волатильності 24-26 липня! З вечора четверга 23.07 і всі вихідні — сильна волатильність видачі. Черговий непідтверджений апдейт, який «розігнався» у п'ятницю. Що відомо? ▪️ Трекери (Semrush Sensor, Mozcast, AccuRanker, Sistrix та ін.) — пік близько 24 липня ▪️ Це вже ТРЕТЯ хвиля за місяць: 11 липня → 18-19 липня → 24-26 липня ▪️ Останній підтверджений апдейт — June Spa

🤝3🌚2👀1

24 Jul 2026, 10:00 UTC244 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Консоль знову давно не оновлюється Апдейт чи доопрацювання консолі? Напишіть свої варіанти у коментарях👇

23 Jul 2026, 09:55 UTC305 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

🕷 Google оновив документацію по crawl budget: усі сайти стартують «з нуля»! У доці Optimize Your Crawl Budget з'явилося нове формулювання: кожен сайт починає з однакового дефолтного, консервативного ліміту краулінгу. Якщо є попит на більший обхід і сайт залишається «здоровим» — ліміт зросте автоматично. Що це означає? ▪️ Новий сайт чи переїзд на новий домен = Googlebot ходить обережно. Швидку індексацію треба «засл

👍3

21 Jul 2026, 07:12 UTC410 views6 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

📉 Google трясе видачу: неофіційний апдейт на вихідних! У суботу, 18 липня, інструменти моніторингу зафіксували різкий сплеск волатильності у видачі Google. Mozcast, SEMrush, Sistrix, AccuRanker, Algoroo — всі показують турбулентність значно вищу за норму 📊 Що відомо 📝 🔹 Пік коливань припав на 18 липня, але штормило весь минулий тиждень 🔹 Частина SEO-фахівців фіксує розворот: рухи від ~11 липня почали відкочуватись у

👍3🤝3

7 Jul 2026, 14:11 UTC339 views4 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Google Search Console тепер показує, як твої соцмережі та відео працюють у пошуку Google розширює експеримент Social Channels у Search Console. Тепер у звіті Insights видно, як контент із соцмереж і відеоплатформ (YouTube, TikTok, Instagram) виступає у видачі Google — поряд із даними твого сайту 🔍 Що показує звіт 📝 🔹 Total reach — кліки та покази, які Google приводить на твої соцканали 🔹 Content performance — топов

🤔2🤝2

24 Jun 2026, 16:45 UTC393 views6 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

June 2026 spam update https://status.search.google.com/incidents/YUX1peHev5a4fkxLDiUQ

6

22 Jun 2026, 08:22 UTC377 views5 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

✅ ЧЕКЛИСТ: міграція сайту на новий домен без втрати позицій Зберігай — це база для будь-якого переїзду. 🔹 Перед переїздом (підготовка) 1️⃣ Зміна тільки одна за раз: спочатку переїзд на новий домен, потім уже зміна CMS чи дизайну — не все одночасно. 2️⃣ Признач переїзд на період спаду трафіку — менше людей зачепить, більше ресурсів сервера на краулінг. 3️⃣ Верифікуй у Search Console ВСІ варіанти старого й нового сай

👍2😁2🔥1

22 Jun 2026, 07:11 UTC313 views4 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

🌐 Google: при переїзді домену додавай у Change of Address ВСІ варіанти Google оновив гайд по міграції сайтів і додав важливе уточнення для тих, хто переїжджає з одного домену на інший. Тепер при зміні домену потрібно подавати запити в інструменті Change of Address для всіх піддоменів і варіантів старого домену — і www, і non-www — навіть якщо ти ними не користуєшся. 📌 Як це виглядає на практиці: Переїжджаєш з examp

3👍1

9 Jun 2026, 13:54 UTC524 views14 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

🚀 Ahrefs запустив безкоштовний API для Domain Rating! Тепер DR будь-якого домену можна тягнути прямо з коду — безкоштовно і без API-ключа. Просто GET-запит, і готово. 🔹 Без підписки, без реєстрації, без ключа 🔹 Формати на вибір: JSON, CSV, XML, PHP 🔹 Приклади під cURL, Python, Node.js, Go ⚡️ Навіщо це треба: Масова перевірка DR для списків доменів, дропів, аутрич-баз і пет-проєктів — без витрат лімітів основного а

10👍2🤝2

3 Jun 2026, 06:24 UTC694 views4 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

🚨 Google дає дані по AI-видимості — прямо в Search Console! Вийшов новий звіт Search Generative AI performance. Тепер видно, як твій сайт показується всередині AI-фіч Google — і окремо в Пошуку, і окремо в Discover. 📊 Що з'явилось у GSC: — Розділ «Generative AI» у Performance → Search results — Окремий «Generative AI» під Discover — Покази (impressions) в AI-відповідях + розбивка по сторінках, країнах, девайсах і д

🤝3👀1

27 May 2026, 10:54 UTC553 views4 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Ручнік сам прийшов, ручнік сам пішов на всіх com.de доменах. Про що писав вище https://t.me/SEODropLab/155

👏4

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @SEODropLab. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 563,826 of 1,481,346entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“SEO Fuel (SEO, iGaming, PBN, дроп домени)” (@SEODropLab), 450 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/SEODropLab.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.