Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

رندستان

@Rendestan

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

409subscribers

+2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002126343914
TypeChannel
Username@Rendestan
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 8 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Rendestan

Growth

4074094087 Aug 2026, 12:50 — 407 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 05:46 — 407 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 08:40 — 409 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 12:508 Aug 2026, 08:40
3 measurements taken within a single day, net +2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 407–409 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 08:40409+2
8 Aug 2026, 05:46407no change
7 Aug 2026, 12:50407first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 15 December 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 25 February 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
2m 57s
Average length
2m 57s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

37 reactions across 15 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 78.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
2978.4%
👍718.9%
👎12.70%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 37reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 15 December 2025 to 25 February 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

25 Feb 2026, 10:08 UTC330 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026

عجب زمستانِ آشغالی بود زمستانِ ۲۵۸۴ همه‌ش اینجوری که "مگه بدتر از اینم می‌شه"، و هی می‌بینی که آره می‌شه.

2

24 Feb 2026, 13:10 UTC325 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @Saalekia

شما برای offendedکردنِ گروهِ هدفت، نیاز داری که با ادبیاتی بهش توهین کنی که براش "بیشترین توهین‌آمیزیِ ممکن" رو داشته باشن. یعنی وقتی با این حیواناتِ مادونِ نئاندرتال طرفی، باید با ادبیات نئاندرتالی بهشون توهین کنی که پره از ترمینولوژیِ منفور بین روشنفکران: "غیرت" و "ناموس" و امثالهم. از استفاده از الفاظ رکیکی که برآمده از چنین ادبیاتی هستن ابایی نداشته باشین "اگه طرف مقابلتون باهاش offended می‌شه". وگرنه خشونت هم چی

👍3

24 Feb 2026, 13:10 UTC259 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @Saalekia

لای پرانتز به این مسئله هم اشاره کنم (دارای محتوای حساس و تعداد زیادی الفاظ رکیکه. اگه اذیت می‌شید نخونید): کلام، "لزوماً" شایسته‌ی عفت نیست چون واقعیتِ آزاردهنده‌ی دنیا (موضوعِ موردِ بازنماییِ زبان) چندان چیز عفیفی نیست. رسالتِ اولیه‌ی زبان، بازنماییِ واقعیتِ دنیاست نه سانسورش. اینکه ژست آدم متشخص بگیریم و از الفاظ رکیک -در شرایط موردنیاز- استفاده نکنیم، از ما صرفاً یک ریاکار می‌سازه. حالا اینکه بیایم از این ریاکاری

11 Feb 2026, 11:37 UTC334 viewsread 8 August 2026

پس چه داری چشم ز چشم دوستان دور یا نزدیک؟

2 Feb 2026, 12:02 UTC420 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @linguisticsPSVideo

Video, posted without a caption

2

1 Jan 2026, 16:18 UTC500 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @Saalekia

آمیختگی قومی ایرانیان فردوسی در نامه‌ی رستم فرخزاد (سردار ایرانی در نبرد قادسیه) به برادرش عنوان می‌کنه که داریم شکست می‌خوریم و از فجایعی که قراره در آینده اتفاق بیافتن صحبت می‌کنه: زِ ایران و از ترک و از تازیان نژادی پدید آید اندر میان نه دهقان، نه ترک و نه تازی بُوَد سخن‌ها به کردار بازی بُوَد دهقان، نماد ایرانی اصیل بوده. در واقع اصیل‌ترین ایرانی‌ها، طبقه‌ی دهقان‌ها بودن. حتی از موبدها هم اصیل‌تر و ایرانی‌تر و ب

1👎1

31 Dec 2025, 17:51 UTC318 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @Saalekia

یادتون بیاد که کی‌ها ناراحت بودن -به هر دلیلی- زمانی که "صدا و سیما" موشک خورد. اون موقع به جهت‌گیری‌های سیاسیشون توجه کنین و هر طرف که رفتن، شما از طرفِ دیگه برین؛ چون چنین جهت‌گیری‌هایی هیچ‌جوره سفید نمی‌شن با هیچ ژست اعتراضی‌ای.

👍1

31 Dec 2025, 17:51 UTC325 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @Saalekia

الان باز اون ۶ هزار دنبال‌کننده کندذهنش می‌گن نه ببین این خودش مخالفه، مگه ندیدی توی پستاش هی اعتراض میکنه و مدام حرفای سیاسی می‌زنه🤡 پی‌نوشت ^ببخشید بابت توهین به قشر کندذهن^

👍1

31 Dec 2025, 15:38 UTC369 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @wittgenstien

روزهای من بین منطق، سوت زدن، پیاده‌روی و افسردگی می‌گذرد. /ویتگنشتاین

1

30 Dec 2025, 08:05 UTC393 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026

از این به بعد هرجا که منادای "ایرانی" دیدم، لفت می‌دم. اوایل صرفاً مسخره بود؛ یه مدت بعد خز هم شد؛ الان دیگه تهوع‌آور هم شده‌. این رو اینجا گفتم چون از چندتا چنل لفت دادم، خواستم در جریان باشن.

3👍1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Rendestan. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“رندستان” (@Rendestan), 409 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Rendestan.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.