https://t.me/TalkToKitchenBot - чат-бот для обратной связи
https://t.me/rthmnwepbmebot - чат-бот для получения юридической помощи и консультаций
Заявление в РКН № 4984265972
https://gosuslugi.ru/snet/67a358a9dc130259d5a00b21
Created
29 March 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 87% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Views per post sit far above this size band
26,300 average views per post against 33,975 subscribers — an engagement rate of 77.5%. Across the 8,376 registered channels in the same cohort — 31,624–99,993 subscribers, posting mainly in Russian — the middle half sit between 5.02% and 20.9%, with a median of 10.5%.
What this was computed from
Window
30 days (27 August 2026 – 26 September 2026)
Posts measured
14 of 14 published in the window (0 exact, 14 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled
368,630
Mature posts only
86.4% over 12 posts read at least 24h after publication
When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.
This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.
Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 26 September 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Growth
33 measurements spanning 43 days, net +154. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 33,798–33,998 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 33
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
18 Sept 2026, 11:59
33,975
+8
16 Sept 2026, 07:15
33,967
+13
14 Sept 2026, 16:18
33,954
+21
13 Sept 2026, 00:40
33,933
-2
11 Sept 2026, 01:56
33,935
+1
8 Sept 2026, 00:38
33,934
+22
4 Sept 2026, 20:17
33,912
-4
3 Sept 2026, 01:27
33,916
+1
2 Sept 2026, 02:21
33,915
-4
31 Aug 2026, 01:23
33,919
+1
30 Aug 2026, 00:16
33,918
+8
29 Aug 2026, 00:56
33,910
+5
27 Aug 2026, 22:12
33,905
+9
27 Aug 2026, 00:14
33,896
-7
26 Aug 2026, 00:26
33,903
-6
25 Aug 2026, 00:13
33,909
+4
23 Aug 2026, 12:36
33,905
+15
22 Aug 2026, 02:18
33,890
+7
20 Aug 2026, 23:13
33,883
-9
18 Aug 2026, 16:42
33,892
first reading
Engagement
42 posts held, back to 3 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 87 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
77.5%
avg views ÷ 33,975 subscribers
Avg views / post
26,300
14 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.76%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
14
of 42 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 September 2026
Posts held
42 (3 July 2026 – 26 September 2026)
Views total
368,630
Reactions total
10,177
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
26 Sept 2026, 18:33 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
283
Videos
17
Links
536
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 26 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
3m 20s
Average length
1m 07s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
35,664 reactions across 42 posts, in 45 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
16,069
45.1%
👍
13,005
36.5%
❤
4,179
11.7%
❤🔥
524
1.47%
😁
410
1.15%
👏
202
0.566%
⚡
160
0.449%
👎
120
0.336%
💩
117
0.328%
🤣
108
0.303%
💯
97
0.272%
🤔
80
0.224%
🤝
80
0.224%
🕊
67
0.188%
😢
58
0.163%
😱
52
0.146%
🎉
50
0.14%
🫡
42
0.118%
🤡
40
0.112%
🤬
39
0.109%
25 further kinds
165
0.463%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 42 of the 42 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 35,664 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 42 most recent posts we hold, published 3 July 2026 to 26 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Славная оппозиция у Владимира Владимировича! отличнейшая! А какие ходоркотики! Фу ты, пропасть, какие ходоркотики! розоватые, с "красными линиями"! Я ставлю Бог знает что, если у кого-либо найдутся такие! Взгляните, ради Бога, на них, — особенно если они станут с социал-демократом говорить, — взгляните сбоку: что это за объядение! Описать нельзя: топь! трясина! болотный огонь! Господи Боже мой! Николай Чудотворец, уг…
https://youtu.be/Bl3iRDXnL7c?si=R_0GB_nM2ZF1-tJj
Сегодня Реми Майснер с тов. Мю разбирают одно давнишнее интервью т-ща Бондаренко г-ну Миронову. Товарищ Бондаренко, которого мы в нашем коллективе с уважением называем «Кандидат Шрёдингера» (то ли он кандидат в депутаты, то ли он не кандидат), изрядно поговорил с буржуазным юристом Мироновым про землю, про волю, про рабочую долю и про революционность г-на Зюганова. По…
Честные выборы, тотальные чингисханы и освободительная деурбанизация в важной точке завершения СВО
Продолжаем вести хроники пикирующего Антифашизма, товарищи дорогие!
Почитаем подборочку свежей (первой и второй свежести) антифашистской прессы Антифашистской Империи Путинско-Кадыровского Добра!
Итак, много месяцев подряд великая Антифашистская Империя Тотального Добра имени Путина-Кадырова успешно одолевала в полях …
ПЛОХИЕ НОВОСТИ: «ЗАБАСТКОМ» ЗАКРЫВАЕТСЯ
Проекту «ЗабастКом» восемь лет. Всё это время мы работали на энтузиазме редакторов и на поддержке тех, кто считает наш труд важным. А сейчас приходится сказать прямо: то, на чём «ЗабастКом» держался все эти годы, закрывается.
Роскомнадзор в неиссякаемой заботе о гражданах глушит хостинги целыми площадками, и наша попала под раздачу вместе с тысячами чужих сайтов. Нас не выбир…
В этом месяце все трудящиеся подданные Антифашистской Империи Добра будут выполнять свой верноподданнический долг — участвовать в буржуазных выборах.
Серый кардинал Империи, ясновельможный пан Кириенко Старший мудро подметил, что для подданных сии выборы носят «терапевтический характер», то есть это такая таблетка, которую пациенту-трудящемуся надо скушать, чтобы не было так мучительно больно за бесцельно прожитые г…
Профсоюзная агитация
Традиционные профсоюзы вырастали, окруженные заводскими стенами, но для курьера рабочее место — это город, а значит нашему профсоюзу придется расти на улице. Для этого необходимо дать о себе знать. Пришло время агитации!
Наша задача — сделать так, чтобы курьеры в каждом городе нашей страны знали, что организованная борьба за права возможна.
Если вы, как и мы, считаете, что курьеры заслуживают …
❗️😊 Агитбот 2.0 — встречайте глобальное обновление: поиск сразу по всем разделам и ответы разговорного ИИ
Мы постоянно получаем предложения о том, чтобы Агитбот мог отвечать сам на любой вопрос. Вы просили — мы сделали! Рассказываем о принципиально новом функционале:
— Раньше в Агитботе приходилось искать материал отдельно по 4 разным разделам: по мифам, терминам, цитатам классиков марксизма и фрагментам левого Ют…
👍421🔥165❤32🤔12👏8🤡3👎2⚡1
Showing the 12 most recent of 42 posts we hold for @RemiMeisner. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@RemiMeisner edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
23 September 2026
Most recent edit
23 September 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
АГИТПРОП @Agitblog · 109,207 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 14 August 2026
Диалектик @dialectic_club · 26,094 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 13 September 2026
РТФ Российский Трудовой Фронт (РОТ ФРОНТ) @RotFront_su · 24,804 Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 15 September 2026
Простые числа @primenumbers2021 · 68,526 Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 20 August 2026
ЦИФРОВАЯ ИСТОРИЯ – Егор Яковлев @egoryakovleff · 61,687 Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 22 August 2026
Politeconomics @politeconomics · 20,952 Telegram ranks this channel #78 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 25 September 2026
This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Реми Майснер” (@RemiMeisner), 33,975 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/RemiMeisner.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.