Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 58% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
62 measurements spanning 97 days, net +1,284. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 14,851–16,654 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 62
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
11 Nov 2026, 13:21
16,343
-4
9 Nov 2026, 16:39
16,347
-4
8 Nov 2026, 08:59
16,351
-3
7 Nov 2026, 03:39
16,354
-10
6 Nov 2026, 01:09
16,364
-4
4 Nov 2026, 23:18
16,368
+4
3 Nov 2026, 22:07
16,364
+2
2 Nov 2026, 23:08
16,362
-7
2 Nov 2026, 01:41
16,369
+2
1 Nov 2026, 02:40
16,367
-5
31 Oct 2026, 05:08
16,372
-8
30 Oct 2026, 04:51
16,380
-10
29 Oct 2026, 06:21
16,390
-10
28 Oct 2026, 03:30
16,400
-18
25 Oct 2026, 23:20
16,418
-11
25 Oct 2026, 02:07
16,429
-7
23 Oct 2026, 23:10
16,436
-4
22 Oct 2026, 20:35
16,440
+3
21 Oct 2026, 19:18
16,437
+1
20 Oct 2026, 15:47
16,436
first reading
Engagement
81 posts held, back to 21 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 71 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
38.2%
avg views ÷ 16,343 subscribers
Avg views / post
6,240
31 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.44%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
31
of 81 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 November 2026
Posts held
81 (21 July 2026 – 11 November 2026)
Views total
193,400
Reactions total
6,649
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
11 Nov 2026, 18:20 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
624
Videos
92
Links
622
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
6m 13s
Average length
41s
Measured directly from 9 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
17,279 reactions across 81 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
5,989
34.7%
🔥
5,148
29.8%
🤣
3,043
17.6%
🤬
2,936
17.0%
👎
163
0.943%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 81 of the 81 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 17,279 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 81 most recent posts we hold, published 21 July 2026 to 11 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 31 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
❗️Олег Комолов в Сибири и на Алтае!
Кандидат экономических наук и автор канала «Простые числа» Олег Комолов выступит с лекциями в Томске, Новосибирске и Барнауле.
Томск
Тема: «Экономический чекап: что валютный курс говорит о будущем России?»
Почему час труда немца, гаитянца и жителя России получает столь разную денежную оценку? Как на неё влияют технологическое лидерство, военная сила и способность трудящихся отста…
🖊 Святые квадратные метры — как работал православный капитализм
Улица Рубинштейна в Петербурге сегодня пахнет кофе, вином и ассоциируется с городской богемой. Мало кто из гуляющих вспоминает, что еще сто лет назад этот район был ареной не менее бурной, но совершенно иной жизни — финансово-предпринимательской. Памятником той эпохи остается доходный дом подворья Троице-Сергиевой лавры (на фото) — здание, в котором дух…
Лидеру профсоюза Wildberries вновь грозит реальный срок в колонии
Кассационный суд в течение одной недели отклонил сразу две жалобы председателя профсоюза работников компании Wildberries Александра Швеца. Судебные инстанции признали законными решения руководства маркетплейса о недопуске активиста на рабочее место и отказ в его переводе на выборную должность. Новые вердикты суда существенно повышают риск того, что на…
🖊 Крах банка Ueno обернулся острым политическим кризисом в Парагвае
Долгое время банк Ueno являлся одним из крупнейших финансовых институтов Парагвая. Получив официальную регистрацию вскоре после победы президента Сантьяго Пеньи в 2023 году, он быстро стал символом и структурно значимой частью неолиберальных реформ и нового курса инвестиционной открытости страны. Так, общее число вкладчиков банка оценивалось примерн…
🖊 «Синее цунами» накрывает США: республиканцы терпят тяжёлое поражение на промежуточных выборах
Несколько дней назад, 4 ноября, в Соединённых Штатах Америки состоялись очередные промежуточные выборы. На них американскому обществу предстояло не только определить полностью обновлённый состав Палаты представителей, но и решить судьбу трети мандатов Сената и постов губернаторов в 36 штатах.
Согласно последним данным, н…
От советского АПК к корпоративным агрохолдингам
Эволюция советского сельского хозяйства не закончилась противостоянием колхозов и совхозов. К 1970–1980-м годам стало ясно, что даже самые мощные хозяйства не способны эффективно существовать в изоляции. Требовался качественно новый шаг — соединение производства, переработки и логистики в единые структуры. Так возникли советские агропромышленные комплексы и комбинаты.
…
Главная проблема современного левого движения — отсутствие настоящей массовой партийной структуры. Пока ее нет, любые разговоры о больших переменах остаются разговорами. Реальный выход лежит в кропотливой работе по созданию такой организации.
Это задача номер один. Только когда политический субъект будет сформирован, появится возможность действовать системно и настойчиво. Без него даже самые верные идеи остаются раз…
❗️Обыски, допросы и заявления о пытка: в Новосибирске задержали членов РКП(и)
В Новосибирске силовики задержали членов РКП(и) Сергея Крупенько и Олега Мецлера. У Крупенько дома прошёл обыск с изъятием телефона, после чего обоих доставили в СК РФ.
По предварительным данным, Сергей Крупенько проходит подозреваемым по уголовному делу о повторной дискредитации Вооружённых сил РФ, а Олег Мецлер находится в статусе свиде…
Две формы одной системы
В советской экономике сельское хозяйство никогда не было однородным. В нем параллельно существовали две принципиально разные формы организации производства — совхоз и колхоз. Разница между ними была не технической и не административной. Это было различие двух типов социалистической собственности, последовательно государственной (общенародной) и кооперативно-коллективной (групповой).
Совхоз —…
Картель «Феб» навсегда изменил срок службы вещей
В канун Рождества 1924 года в Женеве состоялась встреча, которая навсегда изменила мировую экономику и потребительские привычки человечества. Представители промышленных компаний, в том числе немецкой Osram, нидерландской Philips, французской Compagnie des Lampes и американской General Electric, собрались, чтобы создать организацию Phoebus S.A. Официально этот альянс, …
Ведущий радио Sputnik (входит в медиахолдинг МИА «Россия сегодня») Егор Холмогоров заявил, что коммунисты угрожают России:
«К 2026 году коммунизм и советизм снова стал главным угрожающим России злом. Большей опасности сейчас просто нет».
✊ @agitbrigade
🤣335🤬73🔥44👍16
Showing the 12 most recent of 81 posts we hold for @agitbrigade. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@agitbrigade edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
19 August 2026
Most recent edit
19 August 2026
Polls
The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Каков был главный результат вашей агитации среди коллег и знакомых?
Получилось переубедить несколько человек, теперь они разделяют мои взгляды23%
Собеседники согласились с некоторыми тезисами (например, о правах работников), но левыми не стали48%
Меня послушали, покивали, но остались при своем мнении40%
Это привело к ссорам, конфликтам на работе или разрыву отношений17%
Не практиковал \ результат15%
The shares total 143%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Сохранение диктатуры капитала (при моей жизни система не изменится)29%
Узнать результаты8%
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 81 most recent posts we hold, published 21 July 2026 to 11 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 12 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Думай сам/Думай сейчас. @dumai_sam_i_sei4as · 29,850 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 8 September 2026
Диалектик @dialectic_club · 26,340 Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 13 September 2026
РТФ. Российский Трудовой Фронт @RotFront_su · 24,981 Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 15 September 2026
Простые числа @primenumbers2021 · 68,623 Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 20 August 2026
АГИТПРОП @Agitblog · 109,067 Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 14 August 2026
Профсоюз работников IT @ruitunion · 36,094 Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 2 September 2026
Рудой @rud01vb · 18,936 Telegram ranks this channel #90 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 3 October 2026
This channel appears in 7 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“АМБ” (@agitbrigade), 16,343 subscribers as measured 11 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/agitbrigade.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.