Channel
@ReligiousBMW
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
63subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001403991172 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ReligiousBMW |
| Description | For Religious Debates - no banning for ideology No spam, no obscenity, no jews |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 18 April 2020— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ReligiousBMW |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 03:17 | 63 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 23:05 | 63 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 18 April 2020 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 24 October 2021. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Knowing the Will of the Conscious Metadivine Entity (God): While the CMDE has absolute standards of morality, it has to be known. The difficulty, especially in religious texts, is knowing which is correct in expressing the CMDE's sovereign Will and absolute standards of morality. This brings us to the divide within the CMDE, personal and impersonal, known as Theism and Deism, respectfully. The divide is a question o…
Signed Henry
Do you believe Satan or any other concept of an evil praeternatural entity is real?
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Signed Henry
Prometheus
Signed Henry
In your religion, do animals go to your form of heaven?
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Signed Henry
Is the earth, round or flat?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Signed Henry
Do you support freedom of religion?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Signed Henry
According to the above chart, in which praeternatural category do your beliefs lie in?
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Signed Henry
Basic tree dividing base religious positions.
Signed Henry
...while a monotheistic God (CMDE) has absolute standards of morality, it has to be known. The difficulty, especially in religious texts, is knowing which is correct in expressing God's will and absolute standards of morality... For those who believe in Monotheism, how do you identify God's absolute standards of morality? (for Orthodox Christians, it's the bible; for Deists, it's inferred through scientific observat…
Signed Henry
Can the termination of a pregnancy be considered moral under certain circumstances? Discuss personal and/ or religious position in the comments.
The shares total 152%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Signed Henry
Tetragrammaton. Which is correct?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Signed Henry
Obvious in reference to pride being one of the deadly sins in Catholicism. But is pride actually a bad thing? Pride in your race? Pride in your purity? Pride in your children? Is pride as a deadly sin, even biblical? Discuss.
Signed Henry
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ReligiousBMW. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 6 most recent of 12 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Do you believe Satan or any other concept of an evil praeternatural entity is real?
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
In your religion, do animals go to your form of heaven?
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Is the earth, round or flat?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Do you support freedom of religion?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
According to the above chart, in which praeternatural category do your beliefs lie in?
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Can the termination of a pregnancy be considered moral under certain circumstances? Discuss personal and/ or religious position in the comments.
The shares total 152%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 18 April 2020 to 24 October 2021. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Bureau of Religious Warfare” (@ReligiousBMW), 63 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ReligiousBMW.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.