Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for RedTeam feed

Channel

RedTeam feed

@RedTeamFeed

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

598subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 19 September 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001958208070
TypeChannel
Username@RedTeamFeed
DescriptionRedTeam blogposts and articles collection
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded19 September 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/RedTeamFeed

Growth

59819 Sept 2026, 03:47 — 598 subscribers19 Sept 2026, 04:22 — 598 subscribers19 Sept 2026, 03:4719 Sept 2026, 04:22
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 597–599 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 04:22598no change
19 Sept 2026, 03:47598first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 27 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
28.6%
avg views ÷ 598 subscribers
Avg views / post
171
18 posts measured
Reaction rate
—
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
18
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 18 September 2026
Posts held20 (27 August 2026 – 18 September 2026)
Views total3,077
Reactions total—
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken19 Sept 2026, 04:22 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈71
Videos
≈3
Links
≈1,160

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 19 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Recent posts

18 Sept 2026, 21:39 UTC36 viewsread 19 September 2026

From Fork to Framework: What Modifying Apollo Taught Us About Agent Invasion #bishopfox Forking an existing C2 agent sounds faster than building from scratch. Bishop Fox learned otherwise. This post documents what happened when they forked Apollo, built a custom obfuscation pipeline to defeat EDR detection, and spent months fighting an architecture that was never designed for it. via BishopFox Blog

17 Sept 2026, 21:32 UTC77 viewsread 19 September 2026

MikroTrick: Inside the RouterOS Takeover Chain #bishopfox Attackers were exploiting MikroTik routers before fixes went public. Bishop Fox reproduced the full unauthenticated takeover chain, found persistence artifacts on real compromised devices, and breaks down what defenders need to investigate beyond patching to confirm they are actually clean. via BishopFox Blog

17 Sept 2026, 16:04 UTC98 viewsread 19 September 2026

CiliumHound: Graphing Kubernetes Network Policies #specterops TLDR: CiliumHound is a BloodHound OpenGraph extension for auditing Cilium network policies. It ingests a folder of JSON or YAML policies and creates a searchable, Kubernetes namespace-scoped graph. Introduction On some recent assessments, I’ve had to review large, complex Cilium network policies in a Kubernetes cluster, looking for ways in or out of isola…

17 Sept 2026, 13:10 UTC105 viewsread 19 September 2026

Unpacking a laZzzy Donut #trustedsec Recently, we came across an interesting malware sample. It used a multi-stage malware loader that chains together obfuscation and shellcode-injection techniques. The sample begins as obfuscated Python bytecode and… via TrustedSec Blog (author: Scott Nusbaum)

16 Sept 2026, 16:03 UTC116 viewsread 19 September 2026

Ghostwriter v7.3.0: A Fresh New Look #specterops TL;DR: The upcoming Ghostwriter v7.3.0 release brings a major UI refresh to nearly every part of the application. The new design is easier on the eyes, more accessible, and better organized, with a new engagement bar, customizable sidebar with pinned work, a completely redesigned dashboard, and a plethora of other changes. Introduction As it is […] via SpecterOps Blo…

11 Sept 2026, 17:20 UTC241 viewsread 19 September 2026

CVE-2026-82329: Unauthenticated Administrative Access in JFrog Artifactory via an Empty Cluster Join Key #bishopfox A misconfigured cluster join key in JFrog Artifactory's default install lets unauthenticated attackers mint a permanent admin token in one request. Bishop Fox reproduced the full chain, confirmed in-the-wild exploitation, and shares a non-invasive detection check and remediation guidance. via BishopFo…

10 Sept 2026, 21:54 UTC226 viewsread 19 September 2026

Mind the Config: Detecting and Weaponizing NetScaler CVE-2026-19490 #bishopfox A single unauthenticated request bypasses authentication on NetScaler Gateway and AAA virtual servers. Whether that means a dead-end session, a proxy into the internal network, or root on the appliance depends entirely on configuration. Bishop Fox maps every branch and shares a safe detection tool. via BishopFox Blog

10 Sept 2026, 16:08 UTC199 viewsread 19 September 2026

Unmasking SCCM Application Execution #specterops TL;DR: Executing applications instead of scripts via SCCM’s deploy application feature will generate different artifacts due to the fundamental differences in the execution flow. While existing detection tools can catch script-based execution, they often miss stealthier methods. This post covers how to detect the more evasive SCCM application execution. Introduction: …

10 Sept 2026, 13:17 UTC176 viewsread 19 September 2026

So… You Found AWS Access Keys (Part 1) #trustedsec &LTp>Finding plaintext access keys to an AWS account during an engagement is always great thrill. What can be done with them? What do they have access to? Are they even for any of the accounts in scope? It can be super…&LT/p> via TrustedSec Blog (author: Lilly Mayo)

8 Sept 2026, 17:35 UTC169 viewsread 19 September 2026

Token Analysis and Tracking System (TATS) #specterops TL;DR: Tracking OAuth tokens is hard, but Token Analysis and Tracking System (TATS) can help. TATS will collect, store, decode, analyze and provide visual tracking for OAuth token exchanges. It was built to account for known OAuth deviations in the Microsoft ecosystem and will work with any OAuth implementation. This blog explores functionality along with […] v…

8 Sept 2026, 16:16 UTC177 viewsread 19 September 2026

NetNTLMv1 Is Dead. Long Live NetNTLMv1. #outflank Fitting lossless rainbow tables on a 4 TB disk and cracking NetNTLMv1 with WebGPU and ntlmrain. Google’s release of the NetNTLMv1 rainbow tables made it much more practical to recover an NT hash from a NetNTLMv1 response captured with the fixed challenge 1122334455667788, further reducing the needed compute power. NetNTLMv1 cracking is a problem I’ve kept returning…

3 Sept 2026, 17:51 UTC226 viewsread 19 September 2026

Signature Optional - Analysis of CVE-2026-28323 #bishopfox SolarWinds Web Help Desk treated SAML signature verification as optional and skipped every other validation the spec requires. Bishop Fox confirmed the full exploit end to end: one forged POST request, no credentials, full session takeover. Here is the root cause, the fix, and how to detect it. via BishopFox Blog

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @RedTeamFeed. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Профайлинг, нейротехнологии и детекции лжи
@ProProfiIing · 23,133
Telegram ranks this channel #85 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 19 September 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“RedTeam feed” (@RedTeamFeed), 598 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/RedTeamFeed.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.