Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Trusted vs Scammer MMs

Channel

Trusted vs Scammer MMs

@RealvsFakeMM

On this record: Topic · Previous handles · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

264subscribers

+81 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002879467366
TypeChannel
Username@RealvsFakeMM
Created27 August 2025 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 November 2026
Measurements held24
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 9 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/RealvsFakeMM

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 23 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 94% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Previous handles

@RealvsFakeMM was previously reachable at this handle, before switching to its current one. This says nothing about who or what answers at the old handle today — only that this channel no longer does.

@entrustable
held 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026

Growth

183266224.57 August 2026 — 183 subscribers7 August 2026 — 183 subscribers8 August 2026 — 184 subscribers8 August 2026 — 184 subscribers15 August 2026 — 208 subscribers16 August 2026 — 210 subscribers23 August 2026 — 217 subscribers23 August 2026 — 218 subscribers30 August 2026 — 228 subscribers31 August 2026 — 228 subscribers8 September 2026 — 234 subscribers9 September 2026 — 234 subscribers16 September 2026 — 242 subscribers16 September 2026 — 242 subscribers30 September 2026 — 247 subscribers1 October 2026 — 248 subscribers10 October 2026 — 255 subscribers11 October 2026 — 255 subscribers18 October 2026 — 256 subscribers19 October 2026 — 258 subscribers25 October 2026 — 265 subscribers26 October 2026 — 265 subscribers2 November 2026 — 266 subscribers9 November 2026 — 264 subscribers2647 August 20269 November 2026
24 measurements spanning 94 days, net +81. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 171–278 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 24
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Nov 2026, 13:37264-2
2 Nov 2026, 11:38266+1
26 Oct 2026, 16:17265no change
25 Oct 2026, 06:27265+7
19 Oct 2026, 07:18258+2
18 Oct 2026, 10:10256+1
11 Oct 2026, 07:00255no change
10 Oct 2026, 19:21255+7
1 Oct 2026, 19:35248+1
30 Sept 2026, 11:56247+5
16 Sept 2026, 09:15242no change
16 Sept 2026, 02:37242+8
9 Sept 2026, 04:57234no change
8 Sept 2026, 21:40234+6
31 Aug 2026, 00:04228no change
30 Aug 2026, 15:47228+10
23 Aug 2026, 22:37218+1
23 Aug 2026, 08:25217+7
16 Aug 2026, 08:16210+2
15 Aug 2026, 03:08208first reading

Engagement

3 posts held, back to 27 August 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 3 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 February 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Recent posts

10 Feb 2026, 17:03 UTC≈2,610 viewsread 8 August 2026

Report a scammer ⚠️ Post on @Avoid via @Avoidsbot ‼️

27 Aug 2025, 22:16 UTC≈2,800 viewsread 8 August 2026

❌These are scammer MMs 👉 make sure to block them 🙏 @baem ❌ @yuro ❌ @clark ❌ @jett ❌ @zuko ❌ @even ❌ @beat ❌ @sink ❌ @souls ❌ @jungie ❌ @swizz ❌ @tates ❌ @tire ❌ @xavier ❌ @alans ❌ @hazzy ❌ @clock ❌ @always ❌ @diabolical ❌ @enfaced ❌ @Fewdays ❌ @evoking ❌ @ralts ❌ @fronsty ❌ @gravel ❌ @ciipe ❌ @slug ❌ @tore ❌ @cocote ❌ @zujjo ❌ @Congress ❌ @wary ❌ Always see if the person you’re dealing with is in @Avoid ⚠️ ✅ Only Ac…

Showing the 3 most recent of 3 posts we hold for @RealvsFakeMM. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Trusted vs Scammer MMs” (@RealvsFakeMM), 264 subscribers as measured 9 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/RealvsFakeMM.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.