@Onchains pinned «📱 Brand New 4L User NFT @Cuff 🤩 BIN : N/A C/O : $12k View All User List Contact @dexters ✨»

Channel
@Onchains
@onchains
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
6,815subscribers
+2,860 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002813304862 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Usernames | @onchains @shootable @spiller @vaped |
| Created | Between 1 June 2025 and 30 September 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 26 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 43 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 26 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/onchains |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 63% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 26 Sept 2026, 16:17 | 6,815 | +3 |
| 26 Sept 2026, 12:59 | 6,812 | +132 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 18:55 | 6,680 | +3 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 08:20 | 6,677 | +8 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 16:39 | 6,669 | -3 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 14:59 | 6,672 | +1 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 12:41 | 6,671 | +8 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 17:38 | 6,663 | +8 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 00:16 | 6,655 | no change |
| 9 Sept 2026, 23:35 | 6,655 | +47 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 11:00 | 6,608 | -15 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 18:00 | 6,623 | +8 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 08:57 | 6,615 | +68 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 19:17 | 6,547 | +51 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 14:15 | 6,496 | no change |
| 31 Aug 2026, 15:44 | 6,496 | +171 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 22:57 | 6,325 | +98 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 14:55 | 6,227 | +26 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 21:57 | 6,201 | +9 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 09:03 | 6,192 | first reading |
Engagement
47 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 9 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 47 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 2s
- Average length
- 2s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
157 reactions across 37 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5114161152988808839 | 68 | 43.3% | |
| custom 5111920228032317169 | 40 | 25.5% | |
| custom 5111609448493746727 | 20 | 12.7% | |
| custom 5111642566986565374 | 11 | 7.01% | |
| custom 5111764801755811389 | 7 | 4.46% | |
| custom 5111902073205557165 | 6 | 3.82% | |
| custom 5111765583439857688 | 3 | 1.91% | |
| custom 5114240085897775604 | 2 | 1.27% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 38 of the 47 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 157 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 47 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 127
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 4
- of 46 we hold a reading for · 9%
- Most on one post
- 118
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @onchains. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 47 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 August 2026 to 11 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
@Onchains Price Fixes ⭐ • @Illegally 7K ➡️ 6.5K 🙂 • @Nigge 750 ➡️ 999 🙂 • @Dawgs 1K ➡️ 900 🙂 • @ImTheBest 300 ➡️ 200 🙂 • @Demonz 1K ➡️ 900 🙂 • @Consultee 500 ➡️ 450 🙂 • @Resolved 1.5k ➡️ 2K 🙂 • @Trappin 3k ➡️ 2.8k 🙂 • @Mistreatment 500 ➡️ 400🙂 • @Clearanced 250 ➡️ 200 🙂 All Prices are BIN (Buy it Now) Accepting your offers. Contact @Dexters ✨
Look out for scammers, only use trusted MM from @OGUescrow or @RealvsFakeMM
custom 51141611529888088397custom 51119202280323171693custom 51116425669865653741
@/vaped SOLD! 🙂 View All User List
custom 51141611529888088393
📱 New Username NFT @Jhonny 👨 BIN : $500 C/O : Accepting Offers View All User List Contact @dexters ✨
custom 51141611529888088394
📱 New Username NFT @Spiller 🤫 BIN : $1k C/O : Accepting Offers View All User List Contact @dexters ✨
custom 51141611529888088392
@Cuff C/O updated
@cuff is so @tufff 🗿
custom 51119202280323171696custom 51116094484937467273custom 51141611529888088393custom 51142400858977756042
can i @cuff you? ♥️
custom 51119202280323171697custom 51116094484937467273
📱 Brand New 4L User NFT @Cuff 🤩 BIN : N/A C/O : $12k View All User List Contact @dexters ✨
custom 51141611529888088395custom 51117655834398576883custom 51119020732055571652
@Debits C/O updated
📱 New Usernames NFTs @Ruggin🤍 BIN : $1k C/O : Accepting Offers View All User List Contact @dexters ✨
custom 51141611529888088391
Showing the 12 most recent of 47 posts we hold for @onchains. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Mentions
Named by 52 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@ashleyyy · 424 postsDWC Alerts
@DWCalerts · 8,4394 posts@onchains 17
@blasphemously · 142 posts@Onchains.1
@clambering · 322 postsTop’s Stock
@deify · 1,0722 postsdexters ads
@DextersAds · 352 posts@onchains 27
@fleecabank · 112 posts@onchains.2
@illegalizers · 232 postsInternetNews
@internetnews · 2,3812 posts@onchains 26
@UnionDepository · 92 posts@onchains.7
@aesthetical · 181 post@Onchains asset 7
@civilwar · 171 postComchats
@comchats · 2501 postcomify
@comifies · 1,0361 post@Onchains.5
@deeper · 211 post@onchains 21
@eitherz · 451 postExposure Donations
@ExposureDonations · 3581 post@Onchains 24
@gassed · 91 post@Onchains Asset 3
@monolatry · 181 post@onchains asset 4
@nigge · 221 post@Onchains Assets 6
@policeraids · 201 post@onchains 23
@ratlines · 71 post@onchains asset 18
@supplyin · 141 post@onchains 28
@toook · 191 post
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@aesthetical · 1810 posts@Onchains.5
@deeper · 213 posts@onchains.2
@illegalizers · 232 posts@Onchains Asset 3
@monolatry · 182 posts@onchains asset 4
@nigge · 222 postsTexter by @exposure
@texter · 2,8882 posts@Onchains assets 1
@ashleyyy · 421 postBanhelp
@banhelp · 3,3421 post@Onchains assets 2
@devility · 181 post@Exposure Market
@exposure · 6,1381 post@onchains.3
@moneyspread · 371 post@Onchains Assets 6
@policeraids · 201 postTrusted vs Scammer MMs
@RealvsFakeMM · 2421 post@Onchains asset 12
@retaced · 171 post@Shields Whitelisting
@shields · 1,7861 post@onchains asset 18
@supplyin · 141 postOGU Middlemen
@trusteds · 11,3651 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“@Onchains” (@onchains), 6,815 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/onchains.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.