Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Vincent James

@RealVincentJames

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Referenced elsewhere · Cite this entry

28,720subscribers

-83 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001225790696
TypeChannel
Username@RealVincentJames
DescriptionFather, Husband, Catholic, Conservative. Link Tree: https://linktr.ee/realvincentjames Donate ✅ Cash App: $RealVincentJames 🔵 ₿itcoin 3JQpoLyErUsFSdgB4YGhvuo4HxsEQDvywa CONTACT: dailyveracitycontact@gmail.com
Created31 August 2019measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/RealVincentJames

Growth

28,72028,80328,761.56 August 2026 — 28,803 subscribers7 August 2026 — 28,792 subscribers8 August 2026 — 28,775 subscribers9 August 2026 — 28,762 subscribers10 August 2026 — 28,754 subscribers11 August 2026 — 28,729 subscribers12 August 2026 — 28,720 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
7 measurements spanning 6 days, net -83. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 28,708–28,815 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 07:1228,720-9
11 Aug 2026, 08:0528,729-25
10 Aug 2026, 06:0128,754-8
9 Aug 2026, 05:0328,762-13
8 Aug 2026, 04:3228,775-17
7 Aug 2026, 06:1428,792-11
6 Aug 2026, 07:0128,803first reading

Engagement

11 posts held, back to 8 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
20.0%
avg views ÷ 28,720 subscribers
Avg views / post
5,750
5 posts measured
Reaction rate
6.30%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
5
of 11 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held11 (8 April 202612 August 2026)
Views total28,740
Reactions total1,811
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 21:48 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
7,330
Videos
5,280
Links
8,020

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
8m 14s
Average length
4m 07s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

4,611 reactions across 11 posts, in 39 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1,48932.3%
💯1,12624.4%
🔥72715.8%
🎉2505.42%
👍1653.58%
1352.93%
🫡1062.30%
🤣881.91%
🤡831.80%
😁821.78%
🤮501.08%
👎420.911%
😭370.802%
👏360.781%
🙏330.716%
🤔230.499%
🤬160.347%
🌚120.26%
👌110.239%
💩110.239%
19 further kinds891.93%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,611reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 8 April 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 16:46 UTC≈2,170 views154 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

They want to “be more like Sweden” but also want to get rid of white people.

🔥65💯53💩11🤮11🥴43👍3🤓3

8 Aug 2026, 17:34 UTC≈5,940 views472 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Deporting 40 million people would solve 4 of top 5 things liberals complain about. 1. Rent and housing prices 2. Healthcare costs 3. Carbon emissions in America 4. Wages Yet they fight harder for immigration than anything else.

💯33596👍19🔥10🥴5🙉3👏2🤔1

24 Jul 2026, 21:37 UTC≈6,900 views476 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Watching the Nick X Hunter Biden interview… Nick’s constant mainstream rise was always inevitable, but he had to be digitally unrestrained for it to be possible. I knew this back when I first started streaming with Nick in 2017 and 2018: All he needed was one single mainstream platform to remove the handcuffs. That platform was X. Shout out to Elon!

289🔥64🤡40👏31🤮16👎13👍8🌚6

23 Jul 2026, 15:43 UTC≈6,630 views360 reactionsread 12 August 2026

I want this person doxxed and I want them fearing for their life.

💯306🫡2319🤣12

23 Jul 2026, 15:42 UTC≈7,100 views349 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Some homosexual pretending to be a girl was trying to bait and extort my son into sending some really gross stuff. I got involved and created a snap account and this was my convo with them. They automatically thought I was him as you can tell from the first two sentences (last image is the first contact - images are out of order ) because I think my city shows when I request to add. Looks like they got pretty scare

🔥213🫡83🤮23🤬1611🤯2🦄1

3 Jul 2026, 04:24 UTC≈8,190 views324 reactionsread 12 August 2026

It’s weird but Charlie Kirk’s death has put his videos in front of countless young people who otherwise never would have watched his clips. I keep seeing this happen IRL.

🔥196👍5428🤔14🥱9👎6🙏6🤡5

23 Jun 2026, 18:08 UTC≈41,300 views297 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Imagine being the person that believed this stuff at this time... We covered all of this back then. Looking back it looks more retarded than ever.

🔥143💯93🤡279👍8😁8🖕32

5 May 2026, 07:50 UTC≈14,200 views413 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Nostalgia

283🤣60🔥2416🤡11😭7👍4🥰3

29 Apr 2026, 20:17 UTC≈12,500 views487 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Were the sideburns tuff?

271111😁39💯22🤣15🔥8🌭6😍6

19 Apr 2026, 17:06 UTC≈12,300 views834 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Well I’m finally 40. I feel mortal now. I remember I just turned 30 when this all began. Crazy.

463🎉250😁30😭30🙏24💯176🤝5

8 Apr 2026, 05:01 UTC≈15,600 views445 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

The top problems in America we should be dealing with before anything else foreign or domestic are… 1. Black crime 2. Mass immigration 3. White replacement 4. Cost of living In that order…

💯300👍69👎2320👌8🤔8🌚6🔥4

Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @RealVincentJames. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 107,570 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Stew Peters ✝️🇺🇸
@stewpeters · 140,256
Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 13 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Referenced elsewhere

This handle named by sources this register does not control and did not measure — each shown exactly as found, attributed by name, dated to when it was read.

Hacker News

This handle was named once in a Hacker News comment or story, via the public Algolia search API. HN comment and story text has no confirmed reuse licence, so nothing quoted from either is reproduced here — only that a mention exists, when, and by whom, with a link to read it at the source.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Vincent James” (@RealVincentJames), 28,720 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/RealVincentJames.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.