Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Vincent James

Channel

Vincent James

@RealVincentJames

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Referenced elsewhere · Cite this entry

28,261subscribers

-542 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001225790696
TypeChannel
Username@RealVincentJames
DescriptionFather, Husband, Catholic, Conservative. Link Tree: https://linktr.ee/realvincentjames Donate ✅ Cash App: $RealVincentJames 🔵 ₿itcoin 3JQpoLyErUsFSdgB4YGhvuo4HxsEQDvywa CONTACT: [email protected]
Created31 August 2019 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held33
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/RealVincentJames

Topic

Memes & entertainment — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 59% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

28,26128,80328,5326 August 2026 — 28,803 subscribers7 August 2026 — 28,792 subscribers8 August 2026 — 28,775 subscribers9 August 2026 — 28,762 subscribers10 August 2026 — 28,754 subscribers11 August 2026 — 28,729 subscribers12 August 2026 — 28,720 subscribers13 August 2026 — 28,712 subscribers14 August 2026 — 28,696 subscribers16 August 2026 — 28,670 subscribers17 August 2026 — 28,655 subscribers18 August 2026 — 28,657 subscribers19 August 2026 — 28,640 subscribers20 August 2026 — 28,616 subscribers21 August 2026 — 28,597 subscribers23 August 2026 — 28,576 subscribers24 August 2026 — 28,542 subscribers25 August 2026 — 28,533 subscribers26 August 2026 — 28,524 subscribers27 August 2026 — 28,515 subscribers28 August 2026 — 28,503 subscribers29 August 2026 — 28,494 subscribers30 August 2026 — 28,478 subscribers31 August 2026 — 28,470 subscribers1 September 2026 — 28,455 subscribers2 September 2026 — 28,445 subscribers4 September 2026 — 28,423 subscribers6 September 2026 — 28,400 subscribers10 September 2026 — 28,358 subscribers12 September 2026 — 28,335 subscribers13 September 2026 — 28,319 subscribers15 September 2026 — 28,290 subscribers18 September 2026 — 28,261 subscribers6 August 202618 September 2026
33 measurements spanning 43 days, net -542. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 28,180–28,884 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 33
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 01:5828,261-29
15 Sept 2026, 18:0028,290-29
13 Sept 2026, 22:5928,319-16
12 Sept 2026, 05:2128,335-23
10 Sept 2026, 01:3628,358-42
6 Sept 2026, 19:5728,400-23
4 Sept 2026, 08:1928,423-22
2 Sept 2026, 23:1628,445-10
1 Sept 2026, 18:4528,455-15
31 Aug 2026, 15:3528,470-8
30 Aug 2026, 17:0528,478-16
29 Aug 2026, 17:5328,494-9
28 Aug 2026, 19:4428,503-12
27 Aug 2026, 21:3428,515-9
26 Aug 2026, 20:4728,524-9
25 Aug 2026, 20:2428,533-9
24 Aug 2026, 19:5628,542-34
23 Aug 2026, 04:0428,576-21
21 Aug 2026, 15:5828,597-19
20 Aug 2026, 16:2828,616first reading

Engagement

35 posts held, back to 8 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 69 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
21.1%
avg views ÷ 28,261 subscribers
Avg views / post
5,950
6 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.80%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
6
of 35 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 September 2026
Posts held35 (8 April 2026 – 22 September 2026)
Views total35,700
Reactions total1,358
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken27 Sept 2026, 07:28 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈7,340
Videos
≈5,290
Links
≈8,020

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 27 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
15m 51s
Average length
1m 46s

Measured directly from 9 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

9,530 reactions across 35 posts, in 48 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
💯2,50526.3%
❤2,33624.5%
🔥1,54916.3%
👍4975.22%
😁3593.77%
⚡3533.70%
🎉2502.62%
👏1751.84%
🤡1651.73%
💩1481.55%
🤣1441.51%
🫡1091.14%
😱1061.11%
🤯940.986%
😢910.955%
🙏860.902%
🤮640.672%
🥱590.619%
👎540.567%
🌚390.409%
28 further kinds3473.64%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 35 of the 35 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 9,530 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 35 most recent posts we hold, published 8 April 2026 to 22 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

22 Sept 2026, 22:42 UTC≈4,180 views306 reactionsread 27 September 2026

Think about this: $150,000 a year today has roughly the same purchasing power as about $50,000 did in 1990. That’s how dramatically the value of the dollar has changed. If you make less than $150,000 a year, you shouldn’t have to pay federal income tax.

🔥200🤯44👍26⚡19❤12👎2👏1🗿1

20 Sept 2026, 00:25 UTC≈4,000 views191 reactionsread 27 September 2026
Video

Who remembers?

❤114🔥48⚡19🏆7👀2👎1

11 Sept 2026, 21:59 UTC≈6,510 views227 reactionsread 27 September 2026

I logged in one day 2 years ago and it looks like it got hijacked by some Indian. Everything gone and under some Indian name now.

😱105💩65🤣27❤19😡6🦄4🤬1

11 Sept 2026, 21:56 UTC≈6,280 views127 reactionsread 27 September 2026

15 years ago now. Dont even have that FB account anymore.

❤95😢13👍7😁6🦄3👾2🔥1

11 Sept 2026, 21:56 UTC≈5,990 views178 reactionsread 27 September 2026
Video

Facebook just reminded me how epic I used to be at COD nine years ago

❤111🔥35😁19🌚6🥱3🌭1👾1🥰1

5 Sept 2026, 19:11 UTC≈8,740 views329 reactionsread 27 September 2026
Video

When England’s football hooligans finally redirect their tribalism from a meaningless sport to politics and immigration, the establishment is going to have a serious problem.

💯228⚡43🙏25🥱12❤10🤡5❤‍🔥2🤷‍♂2

26 Aug 2026, 05:45 UTC≈7,420 views153 reactionsread 27 September 2026

So many famous Chicago landmarks that don’t exist anymore.

💯90😢50⚡5🤯4🦄3🤣1

26 Aug 2026, 05:43 UTC≈6,820 views143 reactionsread 27 September 2026

The first ten minutes of Wayne’s World is pure cinema

👍82💯32😁11👀10🥴5🦄2😱1

21 Aug 2026, 00:10 UTC≈9,700 views214 reactionsread 27 September 2026
Photo

I used to run this platform.

🔥148🤯23💯15😴8👏6❤4❤‍🔥3💅2

20 Aug 2026, 05:50 UTC≈7,500 views309 reactionsread 27 September 2026

This is what we had to go through in 2016 and for what? 1. No border wall 2. No mass deportations 3. More illegals here than in 2016 4. War with Iran 5. More sexual degeneracy than ever before 6. Trump supporters lives destroyed forever

💯204👍56😢24🤡10🔥6👎4❤3🌭1

20 Aug 2026, 05:50 UTC≈6,020 views163 reactionsread 27 September 2026
Video

Never forget how the left reacted to the results of the 2016 election

❤97🤡25🤣19⚡10🥱9🤬2🙏1

20 Aug 2026, 04:35 UTC≈4,680 views156 reactionsread 27 September 2026
Forwarded from @theenoticerPhoto

“This will no longer be a white supremacist nation, no matter how much you scream, snowflake. It will be a Black and brown majority country where racism is a part of our terrible history, and we will look at it the way Germans look at Nazis. This will NOT BE STOPPED, cry more” - Verified Sex Therapist Stefanie Weiss (EcoSexuality). Stefanie just can’t stay away from the List folks. Encore after encore. She has refin…

⚡115😁13💩9❤8🥱4🖕3🗿2👎1

Showing the 12 most recent of 35 posts we hold for @RealVincentJames. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

Nicholas J. Fuentes
@nickjfuentes · 114,326
#1
NJF Archive
@NJFArchive · 9,764
#2
Warren Balogh
@warrenbalogh88 · 7,671
#3
Pax Tube
@PaxTube · 5,940
#4
Blair Cottrell 🇦🇺
@realblaircottrell · 19,665
#5
Nativist Concern
@nativistconcern · 5,445
#6
Nathan Damigo
@NathanDamigo · 3,709
#7
Cozy Corner
@CozyTVCorner · 3,420
#8
Chief Trumpster
@chieftrumpster · 2,117
#9
Jack Posobiec
@Jack_Posobiec · 116,972
#10
Keith Woods
@keith_woods · 28,190
#11
Disclose.tv
@disclosetv · 321,989
#12
The End Times
@demacre · 38,307
#13
/CIG/ Telegram | Counter Intelligence Global
@CIG_telegram · 115,278
#14
Mark Collett
@markacollett · 20,456
#15
E. Michael Jones
@RealEMichaelJones · 8,227
#16
The Conspiracy Hole
@TheConspiracyHole · 105,541
#17
Joel Davis
@joeldavis_x · 10,406
#18
Paul's Town
@paultownreal · 3,135
#19
🪙 THE FERRYMAN'S TOLL 🪙
@theferrymanstoll · 15,483
#20
Working Men Memes
@WorkingMenMemes · 21,860
#21
Emerson Artwork
@emerson_artwork · 3,248
#22
Pinesap ✝️🌲🍯
@thenarrowway · 4,981
#23
Laura Towler
@lauratowler · 9,228
#24
American Renaissance
@AmRenOfficial · 8,067
#25
VDARE.com
@vdare · 3,792
#26
Mike Peinovich⚡️⚡️🔻
@mpeinovich · 7,299
#27
Classical Theist
@classicaltheist · 4,798
#28
Police frequency
@police_frequency · 69,996
#29
LeftyCrypto Chat 🌹
@Lefty_Crypto · 2,137
#30
Gab.com
@gabtrends · 11,563
#31
White Strike Worldwide 🪧
@whitelaborstrikeww · 4,819
#32
Jimbo Zoomer
@JimboZoomerExperience · 1,336
#33
Bellum Acta - Intel, Urgent News and Archives ✝️ #FreeVenezuela
@BellumActaNews · 114,627
#34
Thuletide
@thuletide · 22,703
#35
Intel Slava
@intelslava · 390,258
#36
Rerum Novarum // Intel, Breaking News, and Alerts 🇺🇸
@rnintel · 170,796
#37
Stonetoss
@stone_toss · 21,018
#38
Internet puke
@internetpuke · 17,391
#39
Zoomers IRL
@ZoomersIRLOfficial · 9,777
#40
𝕊𝕋𝕌𝔻𝕀𝕆 𝔾ℝ𝕆𝕐ℙ𝕃𝕀 🐸📝
@groypergallery · 1,811
#41
🧟‍♂Spooky Steamed Memeballs: goblin mode 😈
@memes_mf · 16,185
#42
Middle East Spectator — MES
@middle_east_spectator · 404,635
#43
YXBA.TV
@RPGTV3D · 304
#44

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 9 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Paul Joseph Watson
@pjwnews · 37,951
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 31 August 2026
Nicholas J. Fuentes
@nickjfuentes · 114,326
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 52 here — alongside 51 others — read 13 August 2026
Keith Woods
@keith_woods · 28,190
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 45 here — alongside 44 others — read 9 September 2026
Just a Dude 😎
@JustDudeChannel · 63,423
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 21 August 2026
Mark Collett
@markacollett · 20,456
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 43 here — alongside 42 others — read 27 September 2026
Stew Peters ✝️🇺🇸
@stewpeters · 136,189
Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 13 August 2026

This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Referenced elsewhere

This handle named by sources this register does not control and did not measure — each shown exactly as found, attributed by name, dated to when it was read.

Hacker News

This handle was named once in a Hacker News comment or story, via the public Algolia search API. HN comment and story text has no confirmed reuse licence, so nothing quoted from either is reproduced here — only that a mention exists, when, and by whom, with a link to read it at the source.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Vincent James” (@RealVincentJames), 28,261 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/RealVincentJames.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.