Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Vincent James

Channel

Vincent James

@RealVincentJames

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Referenced elsewhere · Cite this entry

27,723subscribers

-1,080 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001225790696
TypeChannel
Username@RealVincentJames
DescriptionFather, Husband, Catholic, Conservative. Link Tree: https://linktr.ee/realvincentjames Donate ✅ Cash App: $RealVincentJames 🔵 ₿itcoin 3JQpoLyErUsFSdgB4YGhvuo4HxsEQDvywa CONTACT: [email protected]
Created31 August 2019 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 November 2026
Measurements held63
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/RealVincentJames

Topic

Memes & entertainment — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 59% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

27,72328,80328,2636 August 202610 November 2026
63 measurements spanning 96 days, net -1,080. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 27,561–28,965 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 63
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Nov 2026, 08:5027,723-12
8 Nov 2026, 17:4827,735-10
7 Nov 2026, 14:1027,745-11
6 Nov 2026, 10:3627,756-8
5 Nov 2026, 13:4827,764-11
4 Nov 2026, 13:4027,775-6
3 Nov 2026, 17:0727,781-15
2 Nov 2026, 15:3127,796-12
1 Nov 2026, 14:0927,808-11
31 Oct 2026, 13:1527,819-7
30 Oct 2026, 10:4627,826-19
29 Oct 2026, 08:3627,845-13
28 Oct 2026, 07:3027,858-17
27 Oct 2026, 06:3827,875-11
26 Oct 2026, 07:0527,886-16
25 Oct 2026, 03:4827,902-8
24 Oct 2026, 02:1727,910-14
22 Oct 2026, 23:1627,924-7
21 Oct 2026, 23:3727,931-16
20 Oct 2026, 20:3727,947first reading

Engagement

43 posts held, back to 8 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 156 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
18.9%
avg views ÷ 27,723 subscribers
Avg views / post
5,250
6 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.54%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
6
of 43 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 November 2026
Posts held43 (8 April 2026 – 5 November 2026)
Views total31,520
Reactions total1,746
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Nov 2026, 14:52 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈7,340
Videos
≈5,290
Links
≈8,020

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
18m 30s
Average length
1m 41s

Measured directly from 11 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

12,101 reactions across 43 posts, in 53 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 22.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
💯2,73722.6%
❤2,39019.8%
🔥1,84715.3%
👍6875.68%
🤡5354.42%
🤣5104.21%
😁4553.76%
⚡3643.01%
🤬2552.11%
🎉2502.07%
👏1961.62%
💩1861.54%
😱1631.35%
😢1481.22%
🤯1431.18%
🥱1431.18%
🎃1140.942%
🙏1140.942%
🫡1130.934%
😴1090.901%
33 further kinds6425.31%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 43 of the 43 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 12,101 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 43 most recent posts we hold, published 8 April 2026 to 5 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 6 posts held from the last 30 days (16.7%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

5 Nov 2026, 23:29 UTC≈4,470 views304 reactionsread 11 November 2026

Democrats now have enough seats in state legislatures to enact the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact. This would change presidential elections from the Electoral College system to a national popular vote.

🤬162😁53🤣28💩22😭14🔥6🤨6👎5

5 Nov 2026, 05:43 UTC≈3,250 views278 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Forwarded from @coolcheeseguyVideo

Vincent James at AFPAC III: "From this day forward, if your federal, state, and local representatives are not in favor of banning vaccine mandates, banning mask mandates, instituting an immigration moratorium, halting the resettling of refugees, criminalizing LGBT curriculum, and the forced celebration of homosexuality in public schools, ending all abortion, rigorously limited mail-in ballots and electronic voting, b…

👍168🔥71👏21❤8💩6⚡2💅1🫡1

4 Nov 2026, 16:11 UTC≈7,350 views380 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Despite Trump going to war for Israel in Iran, which resulted in historic upset wins across the country for Democrats… Jewish voters still voted Democrat.

🤣314💯29🤬16😈6💊4🔥4💅3😁2

4 Nov 2026, 04:28 UTC≈5,210 views405 reactionsread 11 November 2026

Texas is officially blue forever now due to a long brewing white replacement. Good luck winning the Presidency in 2028 without Texas Republicans.

🔥153💯124😢54🥱19🤣18😈13😁8😭6

2 Nov 2026, 00:19 UTC≈6,350 views201 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Video

What is going on????

🤡115🤯31🥱19🤔15🙏8😁7😱3🗿2

1 Nov 2026, 20:35 UTC≈4,890 views178 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Pentagon says to make sure you’re prepared for at least 90 days http://preparewithvincent.com

😴95👀31😁18🖕7🤡7😱7👍5🙏4

5 Oct 2026, 01:46 UTC≈7,930 views237 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

A medical professional is dead, and about 200 people who came into contact with her are under medical observation after potentially being exposed to the plague. The medical professional became violently ill shortly after she was exposed to a broken test tube containing the pneumonic plague pathogen while working at the institute

🎃114😱41🥱32🤔13🙏12🤯9🦄4😁4

1 Oct 2026, 08:04 UTC≈7,970 views356 reactionsread 11 November 2026

Hollywood’s race-swapping gets a lot of criticism, but gender-swapping in historical stories is more ubiquitous—and even more disgusting The new Unabomber movie literally invents a female FBI agent and makes her the central figure in an investigation that was actually run by men

🤡244🤬45💯28🥱13😈7🌭5🤔4🔥3

22 Sept 2026, 22:42 UTC≈11,700 views377 reactionsread 11 November 2026

Think about this: $150,000 a year today has roughly the same purchasing power as about $50,000 did in 1990. That’s how dramatically the value of the dollar has changed. If you make less than $150,000 a year, you shouldn’t have to pay federal income tax.

🔥245🤯53👍35⚡19❤14🤡4👎3🗿2

20 Sept 2026, 00:25 UTC≈9,440 views218 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Video

Who remembers?

❤131🔥53⚡21🏆7👎4👀2

11 Sept 2026, 21:59 UTC≈10,900 views246 reactionsread 11 November 2026

I logged in one day 2 years ago and it looks like it got hijacked by some Indian. Everything gone and under some Indian name now.

😱111💩74🤣31❤19😡6🦄4🤬1

11 Sept 2026, 21:56 UTC≈9,940 views139 reactionsread 11 November 2026

15 years ago now. Dont even have that FB account anymore.

❤102😢15👍8😁7🦄4👾2🔥1

Showing the 12 most recent of 43 posts we hold for @RealVincentJames. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

Nicholas J. Fuentes
@nickjfuentes · 112,413
#1
NJF Archive
@NJFArchive · 9,637
#2
Warren Balogh
@warrenbalogh88 · 7,907
#3
Pax Tube
@PaxTube · 5,891
#4
Blair Cottrell 🇦🇺
@realblaircottrell · 19,596
#5
Nativist Concern
@nativistconcern · 5,358
#6
Nathan Damigo
@NathanDamigo · 3,697
#7
Cozy Corner
@CozyTVCorner · 3,341
#8
Chief Trumpster
@chieftrumpster · 2,086
#9
Jack Posobiec
@Jack_Posobiec · 113,696
#10
Keith Woods
@keith_woods · 27,821
#11
Disclose.tv
@disclosetv · 316,796
#12
The End Times
@demacre · 37,901
#13
/CIG/ Telegram | Counter Intelligence Global
@CIG_telegram · 114,525
#14
Mark Collett
@markacollett · 20,352
#15
E. Michael Jones
@RealEMichaelJones · 8,196
#16
The Conspiracy Hole
@TheConspiracyHole · 104,270
#17
Joel Davis
@joeldavis_x · 10,235
#18
Paul's Town
@paultownreal · 3,099
#19
🪙 THE FERRYMAN'S TOLL 🪙
@theferrymanstoll · 15,034
#20
Working Men Memes
@WorkingMenMemes · 21,907
#21
Emerson Artwork
@emerson_artwork · 3,195
#22
Pinesap ✝️🌲🍯
@thenarrowway · 4,938
#23
Laura Towler
@lauratowler · 9,169
#24
American Renaissance
@AmRenOfficial · 8,073
#25
VDARE.com
@vdare · 3,728
#26
Mike Peinovich⚡️⚡️🔻
@mpeinovich · 7,136
#27
Classical Theist
@classicaltheist · 4,730
#28
Police frequency
@police_frequency · 69,008
#29
LeftyCrypto Chat 🌹
@Lefty_Crypto · 2,090
#30
Gab.com
@gabtrends · 11,235
#31
White Strike Worldwide 🪧
@whitelaborstrikeww · 4,867
#32
Jimbo Zoomer
@JimboZoomerExperience · 1,314
#33
Bellum Acta - Intel, Urgent News and Archives ✝️ #FreeVenezuela
@BellumActaNews · 107,046
#34
Thuletide
@thuletide · 22,781
#35
Intel Slava
@intelslava · 385,509
#36
Rerum Novarum // Intel, Breaking News, and Alerts 🇺🇸
@rnintel · 160,511
#37
Stonetoss
@stone_toss · 20,880
#38
Internet puke
@internetpuke · 17,299
#39
Zoomers IRL
@ZoomersIRLOfficial · 9,722
#40
𝕊𝕋𝕌𝔻𝕀𝕆 𝔾ℝ𝕆𝕐ℙ𝕃𝕀 🐸📝
@groypergallery · 1,830
#41
🎅Merry Steamed Memeballs: Christmas 🎄
@memes_mf · 16,067
#42
Middle East Spectator — MES
@middle_east_spectator · 396,815
#43
YXBA.TV
@RPGTV3D · 302
#44

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 9 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Paul Joseph Watson
@pjwnews · 37,188
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 31 August 2026
Nicholas J. Fuentes
@nickjfuentes · 112,413
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 52 here — alongside 51 others — read 13 August 2026
Blair Cottrell 🇦🇺
@realblaircottrell · 19,596
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 38 here — alongside 37 others — read 30 September 2026
Keith Woods
@keith_woods · 27,821
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 45 here — alongside 44 others — read 9 September 2026
LAURA LOOMER
@loomeredofficial · 19,262
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 1 October 2026
Just a Dude 😎
@JustDudeChannel · 62,024
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 21 August 2026
Mark Collett
@markacollett · 20,352
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 43 here — alongside 42 others — read 27 September 2026
Stew Peters ✝️🇺🇸
@stewpeters · 132,435
Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 13 August 2026

This channel appears in 8 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Referenced elsewhere

This handle named by sources this register does not control and did not measure — each shown exactly as found, attributed by name, dated to when it was read.

Hacker News

This handle was named once in a Hacker News comment or story, via the public Algolia search API. HN comment and story text has no confirmed reuse licence, so nothing quoted from either is reproduced here — only that a mention exists, when, and by whom, with a link to read it at the source.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Vincent James” (@RealVincentJames), 27,723 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/RealVincentJames.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.