8 Oct 2024, 06:53 UTCviews —
Channel name was changed to «⚡️☈ᴇᴠᴇɴᴀɴᴛ💀»
Channel
⚡️☈ᴇᴠᴇɴᴀɴᴛ💀
@revenant_MMXX
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
2,329subscribers
-5 since we began measuring on 14 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001597958011 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @revenant_MMXX |
| Created | 26 September 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 14 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/revenant_MMXX |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Aug 2026, 19:49 | 2,329 | -5 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 23:37 | 2,334 | no change |
| 14 Aug 2026, 01:02 | 2,334 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 16 October 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 October 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
1,208 reactions across 15 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 388 | 32.1% | |
| 👌 | 281 | 23.3% | |
| ⚡ | 233 | 19.3% | |
| 🤡 | 107 | 8.86% | |
| 👀 | 91 | 7.53% | |
| 😁 | 43 | 3.56% | |
| 😱 | 40 | 3.31% | |
| 😢 | 21 | 1.74% | |
| 🤯 | 3 | 0.248% | |
| 💩 | 1 | 0.083% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,208reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 16 October 2023 to 8 October 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
8 Oct 2024, 06:52 UTCviews —
Channel photo updated
20 May 2024, 20:12 UTCviews —
Messages in this channel will be automatically deleted after 1 day
16 Mar 2024, 07:02 UTCviews —
Channel photo updated
16 Mar 2024, 06:22 UTCviews —
Channel name was changed to «💀ʀᴇᴠᴇɴᴀɴᴛ⚡️»
21 Jan 2024, 07:43 UTC≈8,740 views116 reactionsread 14 August 2026
People have gotten the "fed" thing all wrong. It almost doesn't matter who the actual feds are. If someone is just a retard and functions as an agent of demoralization, then that's the correct way to view them.
👌80⚡23🤡6👀5🔥2
19 Jan 2024, 14:01 UTC≈7,260 views98 reactionsread 14 August 2026
"Local" news reporters are among the most contemptible; almost all "local" news stations are owned by large conglomerates like Cumulus, Townsquare, iHeart, or are "affiliates" of national networks. They posture as "local" but mostly all report the same nationally-curated crap. If you've ever lived in a "red" programming market, you'll know that any station owned by these companies basically acts as a subversive for…
👌67🔥31
19 Jan 2024, 05:05 UTC≈5,300 views35 reactionsread 14 August 2026
They pushed the timeframe of the talking point back. This signals diminished confidence. And as always, if they were sure of victory, there'd be no point in producing propaganda at all. https://twitter.com/thehill/status/1747682981446037549
⚡34👌1
19 Jan 2024, 04:42 UTC≈6,450 views47 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Winning over suburban White women — some of the only people who even vote for you in the first place — by calling them Karens and racially threatening them At what point do we drop the "RINO" stuff and just admit that this is just what the GOP actually is? https://twitter.com/NEWSMAX/status/1747767003404796328
⚡46😢1
16 Jan 2024, 22:33 UTC≈3,720 views90 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Living in a "red state" teaches you some hard lessons about how clueless your average GOP voter really is; although they may superficially recognize that "The Left Has Gone Insane," GOP voters have a deep naivete that permeates their entire understanding how our political system works. In the online "dissident space," we more or less take it for granted that the institutions are totally corrupt and functionally perv…
⚡60😢19👌5🤡4🔥2
16 Jan 2024, 15:00 UTC≈2,930 views41 reactionsread 14 August 2026
"Please Democrats, please give us the honor of supplanting your actual opponent when you're finished politically persecuting him! We can pretend to put up a fight and raise lots of money from geriatric suckers!"
⚡33😁8
15 Jan 2024, 22:03 UTC≈4,000 views120 reactionsread 14 August 2026
For a community to coherently identify itself, it must also recognize what it is not. "Converts" can join a community, but the "conversion" must be explicitly declared and total. They must submit to the space they have entered. No gatekeeping, no community. Say you're trying to start a rock band and you're auditioning drummers. A guy turns up with a drum machine and sampler and starts demoing his hip-hop beats for…
🔥98👌14🤡7👀1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @revenant_MMXX. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,416,856 of 1,563,849entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“⚡️☈ᴇᴠᴇɴᴀɴᴛ💀” (@revenant_MMXX), 2,329 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/revenant_MMXX.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.