Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Gab.com

@gabtrends

Verified by Telegram

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cross-platform identity · Cite this entry

11,836subscribers

-63 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001155714507
TypeChannel
Username@gabtrends
Created14 August 2019measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/gabtrends

Growth

11,83611,89911,867.56 August 2026 — 11,899 subscribers6 August 2026 — 11,899 subscribers7 August 2026 — 11,896 subscribers8 August 2026 — 11,885 subscribers9 August 2026 — 11,878 subscribers10 August 2026 — 11,868 subscribers11 August 2026 — 11,855 subscribers13 August 2026 — 11,847 subscribers14 August 2026 — 11,836 subscribers6 August 202614 August 2026
9 measurements spanning 8 days, net -63. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 11,827–11,908 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 11:2311,836-11
13 Aug 2026, 05:4711,847-8
11 Aug 2026, 06:1111,855-13
10 Aug 2026, 08:1211,868-10
9 Aug 2026, 05:0211,878-7
8 Aug 2026, 02:4111,885-11
7 Aug 2026, 00:4611,896-3
6 Aug 2026, 10:0611,899no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:4011,899first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 25 October 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 16 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 17 December 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

1,798 reactions across 20 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🙏62534.8%
39722.1%
💯21812.1%
❤‍🔥20411.3%
🏆1256.95%
🤨945.23%
🤮543.00%
🤣522.89%
🕊150.834%
🥰140.779%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,798reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 25 October 2024 to 17 December 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

17 Dec 2025, 19:15 UTC≈4,870 views58 reactionsread 13 August 2026

https://news.gab.com/2025/12/vivek-ramaswamy-is-wrong-about-everything/

32💯22🏆3🕊1

24 Nov 2025, 15:32 UTC≈5,160 views59 reactionsread 13 August 2026

A New Era for Christian Nationalism Begins Today https://news.gab.com/2025/11/a-new-era-for-christian-nationalism-begins-today/

❤‍🔥29🙏1510💯4🤮1

23 Nov 2025, 19:07 UTC≈4,140 views59 reactionsread 13 August 2026

https://christiannationalist.com/

❤‍🔥28🙏18🥰54🤮3💯1

21 Nov 2025, 16:49 UTC≈4,020 views64 reactionsread 13 August 2026

The left wants to build their vision of America. We want to build ours. But neither of us can lift a single brick so long as someone else owns the construction site. That is the realization that changes everything. https://news.gab.com/2025/11/the-great-convergence/

🏆33💯213🙏3❤‍🔥2🤮2

14 Nov 2025, 15:53 UTC≈4,380 views64 reactionsread 13 August 2026

The End Of Conservatism and Our Nationalist Vision For The Future https://news.gab.com/2025/11/the-end-of-conservatism-and-our-nationalist-vision-for-the-future/

❤‍🔥42💯106🙏3🏆2🤨1

10 Nov 2025, 20:46 UTC≈4,410 views62 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Why "Captialism" Isn't Working https://news.gab.com/2025/11/why-capitalism-isnt-working/

❤‍🔥33💯1410🏆5

7 Nov 2025, 13:23 UTC≈4,860 views74 reactionsread 13 August 2026

It's Us Or Them https://news.gab.com/2025/11/its-us-or-them/

🙏40💯23❤‍🔥54🤣1🤮1

5 Nov 2025, 17:25 UTC≈3,780 views80 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Christian Nationalists Are Ascendant https://news.gab.com/2025/11/christian-nationalists-are-ascendant/

🙏5214❤‍🔥7🤣6💯1

31 Oct 2025, 14:12 UTC≈4,850 views107 reactionsread 13 August 2026

A Christian Declaration of Independence From Jewish Power https://news.gab.com/2025/10/a-christian-declaration-of-independence-from-jewish-power/

🙏77💯23🤮43

27 Oct 2025, 14:53 UTC≈5,100 views73 reactionsread 13 August 2026

You Were Made for the Sun, Not the Screen https://news.gab.com/2025/10/you-were-made-for-the-sun-not-the-screen/

🙏43💯18❤‍🔥6🕊31🏆1🤨1

23 Oct 2025, 15:32 UTC≈5,540 views87 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Why We No Longer Know Our Neighbors https://news.gab.com/2025/10/why-we-no-longer-know-our-neighbors/

💯63❤‍🔥9🤨5🙏53🏆2

27 Mar 2025, 15:41 UTC≈18,900 views222 reactionsread 13 August 2026

The UK government just declared war on Gab https://news.gab.com/2025/03/the-uk-government-just-declared-war-on-gab/

🙏129🤣3826🤨10💯8🤮8🏆3

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @gabtrends. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 400,525 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cross-platform identity — Wikidata

A Wikidata item names this Telegram handle as belonging to the entity it describes. This is Wikidata’s claim, not a verification made by this register — nobody here confirmed that the account is genuinely operated by the entity named. Wikidata content is CC0; every fact below is dated to when it was read from Wikidata, not to when the association was first made there.

Q28134981 on Wikidata, read 9 August 2026
LabelGab
DescriptionAmerican alt-tech social media service
Official sitehttps://gab.com

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Gab.com” (@gabtrends), 11,836 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/gabtrends.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.