Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for RealFitzroy

Channel

RealFitzroy

@RealFitzroy

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

6,311subscribers

-121 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001295786148
TypeChannel
Username@RealFitzroy
Created30 September 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 November 2026
Measurements held26
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/RealFitzroy

Topic

International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 45% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

6,3116,4326,371.55 August 2026 — 6,432 subscribers6 August 2026 — 6,432 subscribers9 August 2026 — 6,428 subscribers12 August 2026 — 6,421 subscribers16 August 2026 — 6,409 subscribers19 August 2026 — 6,400 subscribers22 August 2026 — 6,388 subscribers26 August 2026 — 6,378 subscribers29 August 2026 — 6,367 subscribers1 September 2026 — 6,360 subscribers4 September 2026 — 6,352 subscribers9 September 2026 — 6,355 subscribers14 September 2026 — 6,348 subscribers18 September 2026 — 6,342 subscribers27 September 2026 — 6,333 subscribers5 October 2026 — 6,319 subscribers11 October 2026 — 6,328 subscribers14 October 2026 — 6,341 subscribers18 October 2026 — 6,332 subscribers20 October 2026 — 6,326 subscribers24 October 2026 — 6,328 subscribers29 October 2026 — 6,331 subscribers1 November 2026 — 6,322 subscribers4 November 2026 — 6,316 subscribers7 November 2026 — 6,313 subscribers10 November 2026 — 6,311 subscribers5 August 202610 November 2026
26 measurements spanning 97 days, net -121. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,293–6,450 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 26
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Nov 2026, 15:466,311-2
7 Nov 2026, 08:566,313-3
4 Nov 2026, 11:056,316-6
1 Nov 2026, 19:206,322-9
29 Oct 2026, 18:276,331+3
24 Oct 2026, 03:366,328+2
20 Oct 2026, 21:576,326-6
18 Oct 2026, 02:096,332-9
14 Oct 2026, 21:586,341+13
11 Oct 2026, 12:156,328+9
5 Oct 2026, 10:586,319-14
27 Sept 2026, 13:556,333-9
18 Sept 2026, 11:406,342-6
14 Sept 2026, 01:016,348-7
9 Sept 2026, 21:426,355+3
4 Sept 2026, 23:216,352-8
1 Sept 2026, 04:046,360-7
29 Aug 2026, 03:166,367-11
26 Aug 2026, 00:146,378-10
22 Aug 2026, 17:176,388first reading

Engagement

39 posts held, back to 7 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 14 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
31.9%
avg views ÷ 6,311 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,010
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.65%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 39 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 November 2026
Posts held39 (7 April 2026 – 4 November 2026)
Views total8,050
Reactions total213
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Nov 2026, 13:43 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
11m 39s
Average length
11m 39s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

2,851 reactions across 39 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 23.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍67523.7%
❤66223.2%
🔥55519.5%
💯30710.8%
🤔29510.3%
😁1465.12%
🤯702.46%
👎311.09%
🕊311.09%
🤣270.947%
👏240.842%
😢190.666%
🤬60.21%
😱30.105%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 39 of the 39 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,851 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 39 most recent posts we hold, published 7 April 2026 to 4 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 4 posts held from the last 30 days (25.0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

4 Nov 2026, 12:58 UTC≈1,100 views54 reactionsread 6 November 2026

Причин разгрома республиканцев на этих выборах много, но главную правильно указывает коллега Дейнерис была права: Вероятнее всего, республиканцы проиграли не потому что американцы резко прониклись демократами, а потому что часть электората Республиканской партии просто не пришла на выборы.  Те самые "застенчивые избиратели", которые обеспечили победу Трампа в 2016, на этот раз остались дома. Голосовать за демократ…

🔥28👍13😁12💯1

3 Nov 2026, 23:20 UTC≈1,710 views40 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

Самые первые данные о промежуточных выборах в Конгресс США. 5 округ Кентукки. Посчитано 1,88% голосов. Республиканец Хэл Роджерс 73% Демократ Нед Пилерсдорф 23,4%. Выводы делать рано, но есть подозрение, что с "синим цунами" демократы поторопились.

🔥24🤔12💯2😁2

20 Oct 2026, 10:17 UTC≈2,420 views68 reactionsread 6 November 2026

Вице-президент США Джей Ди Вэнс отказался признавать Украину союзником США. В интервью Марку Хэлприну на независимой интернет-платформе 2Way Tonight Вэнс заявил, что Украина не входит в НАТО и не должна становиться его членом. На вопрос, является ли Украина союзником США, Вэнс дал внешне уклончивый, но по сути вполне определенный ответ: Киев, скорее, является ситуативным "партнером", интересы которого временами расх…

❤33👍25🔥10

14 Oct 2026, 20:28 UTC≈2,820 views51 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Video

О "дизельной сделке", реакции на неё в США и её реальном значении рассказал сегодня на Вечере с Владимиром Соловьевым.

❤25👍20🔥6

10 Oct 2026, 13:45 UTC≈3,740 views40 reactionsread 6 November 2026

В американо-российских отношения наступило очередное потепление. Трамп, пусть и с опозданием, позвонил Путину и поздравил его с днем рождения. Не 7 октября, а 9, с учетом разницы во времени опоздание составило больше суток. Ну, окей. Это раньше не поздравляют, потому что примета плохая, а позже – можно. Хотя понятно, что Трамп, может быть, и позвонил бы 7-го, но его держали за фалды "взрослые в комнате" – Рубио и Бе…

❤19👍16🔥5

10 Oct 2026, 13:45 UTC≈3,580 views42 reactionsread 6 November 2026

ОКОНЧАНИЕ. Начало тут Потому что вопреки устоявшемуся мнению, внешнеполитические ориентиры тех или иных американских политиков влияют на их поддержку со стороны различных групп избирателей. Уже очевидно, что подавляющее большинство MAGA, как и левое крыло Демпартии, крайне скептически относится к традиционной для американской элиты поддержке Израиля (есть, разумеется, и исключения, такие, как Марк Левин или Лора Лум…

👍23❤12🔥7

9 Oct 2026, 08:48 UTC≈10,900 views58 reactionsread 6 November 2026

Я долго жил в Черногории. Я хорошо знаю эту страну и ее правоохранительную систему. В то, что ленивые и добродушные (если сравнивать, например, с хорватскими) черногорские полицейские сами бросились арестовывать Михаила Звинчука и его коллег в крохотном курортном Рисане, я не верю ни на секунду. Даже если бы им (черногорскому МВД или АНБ, впрочем, последняя вообще контора-ширма) это было очень нужно, взяли бы в …

👍41💯9❤3👎2🤣2🔥1

3 Oct 2026, 16:14 UTC≈3,400 views37 reactionsread 6 November 2026

Станут ли выборы в ноябре триумфом демократов? Даже если демократы действительно одержат победу на промежуточных выборах в ноябре, как предсказывает большинство аналитиков, это не принесет им особых преимуществ. Так считает старший политический аналитик издания Washington Examiner, научный сотрудник Американского института предпринмательства Майкл Бэроун, опубликовавший статью "На финишной прямой – и что дальше?" …

🔥15🤔9❤5👍4👏2🤣2

3 Oct 2026, 16:14 UTC≈2,680 views47 reactionsread 6 November 2026

Станут ли выборы в ноябре триумфом демократов? (окончание, начало тут) Демократы также могут попытаться положить конец военным операциям США против Ирана, которые и без того носят хаотичный характер. Но и это им может не удаться. Так, Джорджу Бушу удалось реализовать успешную стратегию наращивания военного присутствия в Ираке, несмотря на то, что после победы демократов на промежуточных выборах 2006 года большинств…

👍26🔥11❤5👏4😁1

13 Sept 2026, 13:41 UTC≈2,620 views47 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Forwarded from @DDrobnitski

🇺🇸⚡️🇺🇦🚀 ЭКС-МИНИСТР АРМИИ США "ВСПЛЫЛ" НА УКРАИНЕ В ГАЛСТУКЕ-ВЫШИВАНКЕ На кого он сейчас работает, неизвестно, но его главный посыл — США и Западу в целом нужно больше дронов и новых технологий Ушедший в отставку 2 сентября министр армии США Дэн Дрисколл появился на конференции так называемой "Ялтинской европейской стратегии" в Киеве в компании бывшего гендиректора Google Эрика Шмидта, который сейчас возглавляет ком…

👍25🤔14❤7🔥1

11 Sept 2026, 13:15 UTC≈2,080 views33 reactionsread 6 November 2026

Увидеть Пентагон и умереть Согласно распространенному мифу, американцы никогда не воевали на своей территории. На самом деле — воевали, да еще как. В 1812 они объявили войну Британской империи и едва не проиграли ее. В той войне (которую Британия вела одновременно с войной против Наполеона — это кое-что говорит о ее военном потенциале) британско-канадские войска почти без боя взяли Вашингтон, и сожгли главные прави…

👍18🔥8❤7

11 Sept 2026, 13:15 UTC≈2,570 views63 reactionsread 6 November 2026

Увидеть Пентагон и умереть. Часть 4. Но и без того их было немало. В самом Пентагоне погибло 125 человек — в том числе несколько высокопоставленных офицеров. Еще 64 человека — включая пятерых террористов — погибли на борту самолета (теперь в память о погибших в тот день у западного крыла Пентагона разбит парк-мемориал со 184 скамьями, на которых выбиты имена погибших). Менеджер по безопасности Пентагона Джон Йейтс …

❤32🔥17👍11👎2🤔1

Showing the 12 most recent of 39 posts we hold for @RealFitzroy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 21 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Глебсмит
@glebsmith77 · 28,386
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 10 September 2026
Распутица
@rasputicaa · 128,155
Telegram ranks this channel #87 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 13 August 2026
ПЕСКЕ + PESKE
@apeske · 30,591
Telegram ranks this channel #92 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 6 September 2026
Новости сегодня
@listnewsru · 153,652
Telegram ranks this channel #96 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 13 August 2026

This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“RealFitzroy” (@RealFitzroy), 6,311 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/RealFitzroy.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.