Channel
@RayzzeQ
On this record: Growth ยท Engagement ยท What this channel posts ยท Reactions ยท Posts ยท Citations ยท Handles named that no longer answer ยท Cite this entry
42subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register ยท movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001896775154 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @RayzzeQ |
| Created | 5 February 2023 โ measured โ dated from the channelโs first post |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/RayzzeQ |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 09:30 | 42 | no change |
| 11 Aug 2026, 09:20 | 42 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 5 February 2023 โ the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelโs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegramโs post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute โ we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 July 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegramโs own channel header, read 11 August 2026 โ not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegramโs rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 10 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel โ not this channelโs whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegramโs own rounded chrome, so it carries no โ mark.
66 reactions across 13 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 22.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ๐ | 15 | 22.7% | |
| โค | 10 | 15.2% | |
| ๐ฉ | 8 | 12.1% | |
| ๐ | 7 | 10.6% | |
| ๐คฃ | 7 | 10.6% | |
| ๐ | 6 | 9.09% | |
| ๐ฅ | 6 | 9.09% | |
| ๐ | 3 | 4.55% | |
| ๐ณ | 2 | 3.03% | |
| ๐ | 2 | 3.03% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities โ ๐ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another โ so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one โ 4.34K, 1.2M โ so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramโs own count on each post โ not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above โ those same posts carry 66reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by โa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageโ.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 5 February 2023 to 10 July 2023, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
โข ๐๐ข๐บ๐ป๐ป๐ฆ ๐๐ฆ๐จ๐ฆ๐ฏ๐ฅ๐ข๐ณ๐บ ๐๐ฐ๐ญ๐ฅ๐ช๐ฆ๐ณ๐ด โข - ๐๐ณ๐ฐ๐ท๐ฆ ๐.๐ โข ๐ง๐บ๐๐๐บ๐ ๐ฑ๐บ๐๐๐๐พ ๐๐ต๐ข๐ณ๐ต : 11 - ๐๐ฏ๐ฅ ? 14 ๐ง๐พ๐ ๐๐พ๐๐ : ๐ฃ๐๐๐๐๐๐พ - Gutierrez - ๐ฉ๐บ๐๐๐๐๐๐
โค10
โ ๐ต๐๐๐๐๐ข ๐ฑ๐๐ก โ
- ๐ ๐๐ซ๐ซ๐๐ข๐ซ๐ ๐๐ช๐ฎ๐๐ - ๐๐๐ง๐๐ข๐๐จ๐ฌ ๐๐ โข ๐๐จ๐ฑ๐ข๐_๐ ๐๐ซ๐ซ๐๐ข๐ซ๐ ~ ๐๐ญ๐๐ซ๐ญ : ๐๐ ~ ๐๐ง๐ : ๐ฟ๐ฑ๐ฟ โ ๐๐๐ฅ๐ฉ๐๐ซ๐ฌ : ๐ฑ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ร ๐ฝ๐๐๐๐๐๐ ร ๐ด๐๐ฎ๐๐๐๐๐ ร ๐น๐๐๐๐๐ https://t.me/FerreiraSquad
๐4
โ The Leensize Bad Boyzz โ Billie_Leensize โข Varrios Los Aztecas | ๐๐๐ โข ๐ฒ : ๐ค๐ค ๐ค : ๐ท๐๐ท ~ | ๐๐ฆ๐ญ๐ฑ๐ฆ๐ณ๐ด: Prevayzze Clan https://t.me/LeensizeFamq
๐ฅ3๐1
โข ๐๐ญ๐บ๐ป๐ฆ๐น ๐๐ฆ๐จ๐ฆ๐ฏ๐ฅ๐ข๐ณ๐บ ๐๐ฐ๐ญ๐ช๐ฅ๐ฆ๐ณ๐ด โข โข ๐๐ฆ๐ณ๐ฎ๐ฐ๐ด๐ฐ ๐๐ฆ๐ด๐ค๐ณ๐ช๐ฃ๐ฆ ~ ๐๐ฐ๐ด ๐๐ข๐ฏ๐ต๐ฐ๐ด ๐๐ข๐จ๐ฐ๐ด ~ ๐๐ต๐ข๐ณ๐ต 22 ๐๐ฏ๐ฅ ๐๐น๐ ๐๐ฆ๐ญ๐ฑ๐ฆ๐ณ๐ด : ๐๐ญ๐บ๐ป๐ฆ๐น ๐๐ข๐บ๐ป๐ป๐ฆ ๐๐ข๐ฌ๐ฐ๐ธ๐ด๐ฌ๐ช ๐๐ข๐ป๐ฒ๐ถ๐ฆ๐ป
๐3
#Lแดแดแด แดสsสษชแด <L.S Vagos> Hazrat Rayzze Start: 18 | End: 18 โูููููููููููููููููููููููููููููููููููููููููููููููููููููููููููููููููููููููููููููููููููููููููููู <Grove S.T> Hazrat Rayzze Start : 11 | End? 14 (PSG)
๐7
โข ๐๐๐ฒ๐ณ๐ณ๐ ๐๐๐ ๐๐ง๐๐๐ซ๐ฒ ๐๐ผ๐ฅ๐๐ข๐๐ซ๐ฌ โข โข ๐๐ข๐ป๐ณ๐ข๐ต_๐๐ข๐บ๐ป๐ป๐ฆ ~ ๐๐ฐ๐ด ๐๐ข๐ฏ๐ต๐ฐ๐ด ๐๐ข๐จ๐ฐ๐ด ~ ๐๐ต๐ข๐ณ๐ต 18 ๐๐ฏ๐ฅ ? 18 โข ๐๐ฆ๐ญ๐ฑ๐ฆ๐ณ๐ด : Vetrowize | Disipze
๐ณ1๐1
โข Lothbrok The Brothers Warriors โข โข Moein_Lothbrok โข Russian Mafia ๐ท๐บ โข Start : 24 โข End : ? ? ? โข Helpers : Deep | Softerwize | Rayzze - Thanks For Helps - - Editor | @LothbrokFamilY |
๐1
- ๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ฃ๐ - ๐๐๐ฏ๐๐ง ๐๐๐ข๐๐ฃ๐ค๐ฌ - ๐๐ฉ๐๐ง๐ฉ : 22 - ๐๐ฃ๐ : ๐๐ญ๐ โข ๐๐๐ก๐ฅ๐๐ง๐จ: ๐๐ค๐ก๐๐ง๐๐ฃ ๐ฝ๐ค๐ฎ๐ฏ๐ฏ โข https://t.me/RemanowFamQ
๐ฅ3
๐๐ฏ๐ท๐ช๐ต๐ฆ ๐๐ข๐ฎ๐ช๐ญ๐บ Open๐
[ ๐ป๐๐๐ ๐น๐๐๐๐๐๐ ] ~ ๐ฎ๐๐๐๐ ๐บ๐๐๐๐๐ ~๐บ๐๐๐๐ : 22 ~๐ฌ๐ต๐ซ : 25 ๐ฏ๐๐๐๐๐๐บ : ๐น๐๐๐๐๐ ร ๐น๐๐๐๐๐๐ ร ๐ผ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ~๐จ๐๐๐๐๐น๐ท
๐ฉ5๐4
[ ๐บ๐๐๐๐ ๐น๐๐๐๐๐๐ ] ~ ๐.๐ ๐ฉ๐๐๐๐๐ ~๐บ๐๐๐๐ : 8 ~๐ฌ๐ต๐ซ : ๐๐๐ ๐ฏ๐๐๐๐๐๐บ : ๐น๐๐๐๐๐ ร ๐ซ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ~๐จ๐๐๐๐๐น๐ท
๐คฃ7๐ฉ3๐2๐1
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @RayzzeQ. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked โ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank โ 754,457 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below โ republished posts weigh more than named mentions โ and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channelโs name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page โ a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 3 registered channels โ every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched โ that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting todayโs namer to yesterdayโs owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason โ naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides โ the โNamed by N registered channelsโ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@RayzzeQ named 8 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handleโs history โ see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today โ not that anything โdiedโ. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel โ we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 โ this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
โ๐๐๐ฒ๐ณ๐ณ๐ ๐๐๐ ๐๐ง๐๐๐ซ๐ฒ ๐๐จ๐ฅ๐๐ข๐๐ซ๐ฌโ (@RayzzeQ), 42 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/RayzzeQ.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV ยท JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.