Tonight the music Seems so loud I wish that we could los this crowd Maybe it's better this way We'dhurt each other with The things we'd want to say We could've been so good together
❤🔥4

Channel
@JakowskiSQ
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
25subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001918097828 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @JakowskiSQ |
| Created | 9 June 2023 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/JakowskiSQ |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 09:19 | 25 | no change |
| 11 Aug 2026, 07:15 | 25 | first reading |
15 posts held, back to 9 June 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 19 January 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
84 reactions across 11 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 19.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤🔥 | 16 | 19.0% | |
| ⚡ | 14 | 16.7% | |
| ❤ | 12 | 14.3% | |
| 👍 | 10 | 11.9% | |
| 🔥 | 8 | 9.52% | |
| 🦄 | 7 | 8.33% | |
| 🍓 | 6 | 7.14% | |
| 🗿 | 6 | 7.14% | |
| 🌭 | 3 | 3.57% | |
| 👎 | 2 | 2.38% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 84reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 9 June 2023 to 19 January 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Tonight the music Seems so loud I wish that we could los this crowd Maybe it's better this way We'dhurt each other with The things we'd want to say We could've been so good together
❤🔥4
𝗛𝗶, 𝗜'𝗺 EMRAN, 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗡𝗲𝘄 𝗢𝘄𝗻𝗲𝗿 𝗼𝗳 " Jakowski Prophets Of DarkNess " 𝗙𝗮𝗺𝗶𝗹𝘆 𝗔𝗻𝗱 𝗜 𝗮𝗺 𝗵𝗮𝗽𝗽𝘆 𝘁𝗼 𝗠𝗲𝗲𝘁 𝗬𝗼𝘂 ❤️ Bay MaTi R.I.P👑 @Thorfin38
☠️ 𝖤𝗌𝗊𝗎𝗂𝖾𝗋𝗐𝗓𝗓 𝖥𝖺𝗆𝗂𝗅𝗒☠️ 💎 Yakuza Mafia 💎 ✅ Jimmy_Remanow • 𝖲 19 • 𝖤 ××× 💀𝖧𝖾𝗅𝗉𝖾𝗋𝗌 : Dipsize jakowski Valiant💀
🍓6🗿2🦄2
💀•𝗝𝗮𝗸𝗼𝘄𝘀𝗸𝗶 𝗣𝗿𝗼𝗽𝗵𝗲𝘁𝘀 𝗢𝗳 𝗗𝗮𝗿𝗸𝗻𝗲𝘀𝘀•💀 🔥 Eƚԋαɳ Jαƙσɯʂƙι🔥 💀𝙀.𝙎 𝘽𝙖𝙡𝙡𝙖𝙨 💀 𝙎𝙩𝙖𝙧𝙩 ; 𝟮𝟮 𝙀𝙣𝙙 ; 20 𝙃𝙚𝙡𝙥𝙚𝙧𝙨 : 𝗨𝗽𝘂𝘁𝗲𝘀𝘀 𝗙𝗹𝗮𝘄𝗹𝗲𝘀𝘀 𝗖𝗹𝗮𝗻💀 https://t.me/JakowskiSQ💀
🗿3
Invite Family open [ Limited ] _-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_ Name Level Age Game name Rec aim [ Dmz & War ] : Screen [ /mm>1 _ Topwar _ KillList War ] Send : [ @Man_Ethanm @AmirBlitzex ]
° ᏟᏞᎾᏕᎬ °
👍1
♤ 𝙹𝚘𝚒𝚗 𝚃𝚑𝚎 𝙵𝚊𝚖𝚒𝚕𝚢 𝙱𝚊𝚡 ♤ 【@JakowskiBax】♡
🦄5👍1
- 𝐅𝐞𝐫𝐫𝐞𝐢𝐫𝐚 𝐒𝐪𝐮𝐚𝐝 - 𝐁𝐚𝐧𝐝𝐢𝐝𝐨𝐬 𝐌𝐂 • 𝐓𝐨𝐱𝐢𝐜_𝐅𝐞𝐫𝐫𝐞𝐢𝐫𝐚 ~ 𝐒𝐭𝐚𝐫𝐭 : 𝟐𝟑 ~ 𝐄𝐧𝐝 : 26 ○ 𝐇𝐞𝐥𝐩𝐞𝐫𝐬 : 𝑱𝒂𝒌𝒐𝒘𝒔𝒌𝒊 × 𝑴𝒂𝒄𝒌𝒆𝒏𝒔𝒊𝒛𝒆 https://t.me/FerreiraSquad
👍5
Open Invite Fmily Jakowski شرایط عضویت : فعال بودن در اکثر وار ها داشتن ریکورد بلد بودن قوانین گتو داشتن کلاینت داشتن اف پی اس 40+ فرم عضویت : اسم: سن: شماره ( فقط از طریق اشتراک ) قبلا در چه فم هایی عضو بودید؟ اسم گیم جدید با تگ Jakowski؟ ریک ایم 1min بدون کات ✦ 𝖲𝖾𝗇𝖽 𝖥𝗈𝗋𝗆 VeNuS Mmd - JakOwski Prophets Of Darknees
⚡7🗿1
• 𝘍𝘭𝘺𝘻𝘦𝘹 𝘓𝘦𝘨𝘦𝘯𝘥𝘢𝘳𝘺 𝘚𝘰𝘭𝘪𝘥𝘦𝘳𝘴 • • 𝘏𝘦𝘳𝘮𝘰𝘴𝘰 𝘋𝘦𝘴𝘤𝘳𝘪𝘣𝘦 ~ 𝘓𝘰𝘴 𝘚𝘢𝘯𝘵𝘰𝘴 𝘝𝘢𝘨𝘰𝘴 ~ 𝘚𝘵𝘢𝘳𝘵 22 𝘌𝘯𝘥 𝘟𝘹𝘟 𝘏𝘦𝘭𝘱𝘦𝘳𝘴 : 𝘍𝘭𝘺𝘻𝘦𝘹 𝘙𝘢𝘺𝘻𝘻𝘦 𝘑𝘢𝘬𝘰𝘸𝘴𝘬𝘪 𝘝𝘢𝘻𝘲𝘶𝘦𝘻
🔥8
𖣔𝑰𝒏𝒗𝒊𝒕𝒆 𝑭𝒂𝒎𝒊𝒍𝒚 𝑪𝒍𝒐𝒔𝒆𖣔
Vᴀᴢǫᴜᴇᴢ Lᴇɢᴇɴᴅᴀʀʏ Kɪʟʟᴇʀs - 𝐄.𝐒 𝐁𝐚𝐥𝐚𝐬 - Vɪɴɪ_Nᴇᴄᴋʀᴏss ( Vᴀᴢǫᴜᴇᴢ ) - 𝕾: շշ - 𝕰:𝖝𝖃𝖝 -𝐇𝐞𝐥𝐩𝐞𝐫 : Unidentified × Jakowski -Edited By : XACTOR EDITS https://t.me/Vazquez_LegendaryKillers
⚡7👍1
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @JakowskiSQ. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,057,750 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@JakowskiSQ named 14 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“𝙅𝙖𝙠𝙤𝙬𝙨𝙠𝙞 𝙋𝙧𝙤𝙥𝙝𝙚𝙩𝙨 𝙊𝙛 𝘿𝙖𝙧𝙠𝙣𝙚𝙚𝙨” (@JakowskiSQ), 25 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/JakowskiSQ.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.