Channel
@RavanOstad
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
281subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001775047659 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @RavanOstad |
| Description | ارسال نظر: https://t.me/BChatBot?start=sc-07e078bb0a |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/RavanOstad |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Aug 2026, 23:18 | 281 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 22:47 | 281 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 18 June 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 September 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
161 reactions across 13 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 67.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 108 | 67.1% | |
| 👎 | 53 | 32.9% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 161reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 18 June 2023 to 11 September 2023, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
دکتر برجعلی اقا من میخواستم نظرمو قبل از انتخاب واحد بدم ولی استاد نمره رو تا دو سه هفته پیش ندادن و بعد از اونم یادم رفت. رک بگم، ایشون نه درسی بلدن بدن نه حداقل اخلاق انسانی لازمه رو دارن. مطلقا هیچی سردرنمیارن و بسیار بسیار هم قیافه میگیرن برای دانشجو. کلاس هاشون اقلا برای ما ارشد ها حتی یک و فقط یک جمله علمی و بدرد بخور نداشت. اصلا تدریسی نمیکردن. کلاس ما ۸ صبح بود و تقریبا هر جلسه ۷.۵۰ داخل تلگرام پیام میدادن …
👍28👎5
دکتر سمیه برجعلی لو سلام من با ایشون روان شناسی تربیتی داشتم اما بدلیل اینکه در روان شناسی تحولی تا حدودی ضعف داشتیم ایشون جداگانه به مباحث تحولی نیز پرداختند و از نظریه های مهم رشد نیز امتحان گرفتند که همین موضوع نشون دهنده ی این هست ک هدفشون دانش کلی و یادگیری بچه ها بود در رابطه با نحوه امتحان و نمره دهی ایشون اگه بخوام نظر بدم امتحاناتشون دارای سوالات …
👎10👍7
از دکتر پاکدامن فقط همینو بگم که بخاطر دیر اومدن و غیبت و مطابق میلشون جواب ندادن سوالات سر کلاس به من ۲ دادن=)) @RavanOstad 💬
تحولی۱ و ۲ دکتر پاکدامن ما با ایشون و و دکتر قنبری مشترکا این درسو داشتیم. ما نه متوجه شدیم اون نیمه ای که ایشون درس دادنو نه تونستیم باهاشون ارتباط برقرار کنیم نه فهمیدیم اول هر جلسه مث معلم علوم ابتدایی درس پرسیدن و نمره گذاشتن برا چیه امتحانشونم تستی بود و نه راحت ولی اگه خودتون میخوندین میشد جواب داد در کل اگه حق انتخابی دارین از بچه های سال بالایی بپرسین کدوم استاد بهتره، ولی اونقدرم بد نیستن که بگم هیچ جوره…
👍5
#روانشناسی استاد شهلا پاکدامن من روانشناسی #تحولی ۱ و ۲ رو با ایشون داشتم. ایشون از شاگردان دکتر پریرخ دادستان مادر روانشناسی ایران هستن. حوزه تخصصی ایشون تحول نقاشی در کودکانه و با نقاشی میتونن شخصیتتونو تحلیل کنن. معمولا منابع زیادی و حجیمی معرفی میکنن ولی برای امتحان، چیزی بیشتر از مطالبی که تدریس کردن نمیخوان. تدریسشون بعضی وقتا از اسلایده و بعضی وقتا بدون اسلاید میایستن پشت میز و از روی کتاب میخونن. اگه اسلا…
👎3
اساتید روان pinned «ارسال نظر: https://telegram.me/BChatBot?start=sc-961005-uWwEyvM»
👩🏫 شهلا پاکدامن #دانشیار #عمومی پل های ارتباطی: ایمیل: s-pakdaman@sbu.ac.ir ایمیل: pakdaman.shahla@gmail.com نظرسنجی:
دکتر برجعلی لو 🔺️من با ایشون روانشناسی تربیتی داشتم. از لحاظ تدریس به نظرم خوب بودن. سر کلاس با بحث و تعامل با دانشجو مطلب رو پیش میبردن که این تعاملی بودنشون رو خیلی دوست داشتم. محتوای مناسبی هم ارائه میدادن که حداقل واسه این درسی که من داشتم کافی بود به نظرم. بعضی بچه ها گله داشتن که موقع تدریس و اون تعامل مثلا یه چیزی از دانشجو میخوان که بلد نیستیم. به نظرم این مشکل از ما و بقیه اساتید بود تقریبا. (همون بحثی که ب…
👍7👎2
سمیه برجعلی بنده روانشناسی تحولی١و٢ را با ایشان گذراندم که کتاب روانشناسی تحولی لورا برک ترجمه یحیی محمدی را به عنوان منبع انتخاب کردند اما مطالب ارائه شده در کلاس تا حدودی با کتاب متفاوت بود و تدریس بسیار پراکنده ای داشتند و موضوعاتی را برای ارائه در اختیارمان قرار دادند با وجود ارائه و فعال بودن سرکلاس درنهایت به من ١٧ دادند 😐 حجم کتاب بسیار زیاد بود و با اصرار زیاد راضی شدند بخش هایی از کتاب را حذف کنند امتحان تشر…
👍4
سلام با دکتر برجعلی لو روانشناسی تربیتی داشتیم. ایشون فعالیت کلاسی براشون مهمه و نسبتا خوب کلاس رو میچرخونن. سر یسری مباحث وارد صحبت های حاشیه ای میشدیم و ایشون هم همراهی میکردن. نحوه درس دادن شون خوبه ولی حتما نیاز به مطالعه فردی داره ترجیحا قبل کلاس که وقتی میگن کامل جا بیفته براتنون. امتحان شون تشریحی و مفهمومی بود کاملا میانترم هم گرفتن. پروژه گروهی هم داشتیم که باید مقاله میخوندیم و ارائه میدادیم. @RavanOstad …
👎8👍6
ارسال نظر: https://telegram.me/BChatBot?start=sc-961005-uWwEyvM
دکتر سمیه برجعلی لو
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @RavanOstad. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
دکتر سمیه برجعلی لو
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
دکتر سعید ایمانی
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 18 June 2023 to 11 September 2023. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 980,523 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“اساتید روان” (@RavanOstad), 281 subscribers as measured 6 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/RavanOstad.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.