Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Ralf Hacker Channel

Channel

Ralf Hacker Channel

@RalfHackerChannel

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Advertising · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

28,261subscribers

+239 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001360213421
TypeChannel
Username@RalfHackerChannel
DescriptionПул тегов: https://t.me/RalfHackerChannel/297 Админ: @hackerralf8
Created25 June 2019 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live26 September 2026
Measurements held33
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 26 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/RalfHackerChannel

Topic

Hacking & security — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

28,00628,26128,133.56 August 2026 — 28,022 subscribers6 August 2026 — 28,023 subscribers8 August 2026 — 28,021 subscribers9 August 2026 — 28,013 subscribers10 August 2026 — 28,012 subscribers11 August 2026 — 28,006 subscribers12 August 2026 — 28,080 subscribers13 August 2026 — 28,129 subscribers15 August 2026 — 28,143 subscribers16 August 2026 — 28,159 subscribers17 August 2026 — 28,162 subscribers18 August 2026 — 28,167 subscribers19 August 2026 — 28,168 subscribers20 August 2026 — 28,170 subscribers21 August 2026 — 28,178 subscribers24 August 2026 — 28,176 subscribers25 August 2026 — 28,178 subscribers26 August 2026 — 28,180 subscribers27 August 2026 — 28,183 subscribers28 August 2026 — 28,181 subscribers29 August 2026 — 28,179 subscribers30 August 2026 — 28,173 subscribers31 August 2026 — 28,164 subscribers1 September 2026 — 28,163 subscribers2 September 2026 — 28,159 subscribers3 September 2026 — 28,182 subscribers6 September 2026 — 28,197 subscribers9 September 2026 — 28,224 subscribers11 September 2026 — 28,249 subscribers13 September 2026 — 28,256 subscribers15 September 2026 — 28,259 subscribers17 September 2026 — 28,258 subscribers26 September 2026 — 28,261 subscribers6 August 202626 September 2026
33 measurements spanning 51 days, net +239. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 27,968–28,299 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 33
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
26 Sept 2026, 05:1828,261+3
17 Sept 2026, 07:4128,258-1
15 Sept 2026, 04:1828,259+3
13 Sept 2026, 14:3728,256+7
11 Sept 2026, 22:3628,249+25
9 Sept 2026, 10:2028,224+27
6 Sept 2026, 01:3728,197+15
3 Sept 2026, 22:3728,182+23
2 Sept 2026, 13:4628,159-4
1 Sept 2026, 16:4228,163-1
31 Aug 2026, 18:5728,164-9
30 Aug 2026, 15:4428,173-6
29 Aug 2026, 15:2228,179-2
28 Aug 2026, 14:1928,181-2
27 Aug 2026, 15:2528,183+3
26 Aug 2026, 12:1328,180+2
25 Aug 2026, 09:4728,178+2
24 Aug 2026, 10:5928,176-2
21 Aug 2026, 14:0628,178+8
20 Aug 2026, 16:5528,170first reading

Engagement

24 posts held, back to 6 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 69 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
35.0%
avg views ÷ 28,261 subscribers
Avg views / post
9,900
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.488%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 24 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 18 September 2026
Posts held24 (6 March 2026 – 18 September 2026)
Views total29,690
Reactions total145
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken27 Sept 2026, 07:28 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
477
Videos
17
Links
616

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 27 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

1,030 reactions across 24 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 54.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥55854.2%
👍35034.0%
😁393.79%
😱353.40%
🤔191.84%
🎉131.26%
🥰121.17%
😢20.194%
🙏10.097%
🤯10.097%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 24 of the 24 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,030 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 24 most recent posts we hold, published 6 March 2026 to 18 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
20
across the posts below
Posts paid on
13
of 24 we hold a reading for · 54%
Most on one post
7
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @RalfHackerChannel. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 24 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 6 March 2026 to 18 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Advertising

Ad load
33.3%
8 of 24 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
0
none — marked by hashtag only
Median views · ads
14,400
over 8 measured posts
Median views · rest
13,900
over 16 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. They are printed side by side with the count behind each rather than as a ratio: an ad and an ordinary post are not otherwise matched — for topic, for length, for hour of day — so the gap between them is a description of two groups and not the effect of one being an ad.

Measured over the 24 most recent posts we hold, published 6 March 2026 to 18 September 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

18 Sept 2026, 16:38 UTC≈3,890 views34 reactionsread 27 September 2026
Forwarded from @P0x3k_1N73LL1G3NC3Photo

cups2root Linux LPE Interactive root shell from a local account in the lpadmin group.

🔥26👍6🎉1😱1

Signed Ralf Hacker

8 Sept 2026, 21:58 UTC≈12,200 views61 reactionsread 27 September 2026
AdvertisementPhoto

Продолжается https://github.com/MSNightmare/ShieldCrash Windows Defender 0day Vulnerability #ad #lpe #exploit #git

🔥43😁11👍7

Signed Ralf Hacker

3 Sept 2026, 05:49 UTC≈13,600 views50 reactions1 Starread 27 September 2026
AdvertisementPhoto

Идем дальше https://github.com/MSNightmare/FalconFlank Crowdstrike Falcon 0day LPE #lpe #ad #exploit #git

🔥34👍15🎉1

Signed Ralf Hacker

13 Aug 2026, 09:05 UTC≈12,700 views37 reactionsread 27 September 2026
Forwarded from @P0x3k_1N73LL1G3NC3Photo

VHDVomit A tool to search SMB shares for VHD/VMDK/VHDX backup files, mount them and dump sensitive data including NTDS.dit, SYSTEM, and SAM hives. vbkVomit Extract hashes from Veeam .vbk backup. Reads the VBK directly, finds the NTFS volume inside, walks the MFT, reassembles ntds.dit + SAM/SECURITY/SYSTEM, and runs impacket secretsdump. VeeamThief Rogue vSphere server for capturing Veeam Backup & Replication cre…

🔥29👍3🥰2😱2😢1

Signed Ralf Hacker

11 Aug 2026, 22:19 UTC≈19,500 views113 reactionsread 27 September 2026
AdvertisementPhoto

Он опять это сделал) https://github.com/MSNightmare/ShieldBreak Windows Defender LPE 0day #lpe #ad #exploit #git

🔥80👍14😱10😁9

Signed Ralf Hacker

24 Jul 2026, 09:15 UTC≈12,200 views38 reactionsread 27 September 2026
AdvertisementForwarded from @APT_NotesPhoto

🔒 Certighost (CVE-2026-54121) — AD CS Domain Controller Impersonation Low-privileged domain user can impersonate a Domain Controller via an AD CS enrollment chase fallback. By supplying cdc (Client DC) and rmd (Remote Domain) request attributes, an attacker forces the Enterprise CA to query an attacker-controlled host over SMB and LDAP. The CA then blindly trusts the returned directory objects (objectSid + dNSHostN…

🔥30👍8

Signed Ralf Hacker

26 Jun 2026, 17:39 UTC≈12,800 views35 reactionsread 27 September 2026
Forwarded from @APT_NotesVideo

DirtyClone — CVE-2026-43503 A Linux kernel local privilege escalation and page-cache write. DirtyClone is the fourth public member of the DirtyPipe / DirtyFrag family: it forces the kernel to run an in-place ESP (IPsec) decrypt over a file-backed page-cache page the attacker only has read access to, mutating that page in RAM. With the AES-CBC key/IV chosen so the decrypt writes attacker-controlled bytes, /usr/bin/su…

🔥28👍6🥰1

Signed Ralf Hacker

23 Jun 2026, 18:40 UTC≈10,800 views40 reactionsread 27 September 2026
Forwarded from @P0x3k_1N73LL1G3NC3Photo

🔑 Onelogon: Taking over Active Directory Accounts via Netlogon We analyzed Netlogon, bypassed the Zerologon patch, resulting in a full auth bypass. An attacker can leverage this to compromise computer accounts, or even the entire AD. Non-standard config must be present tho Exploit: https://github.com/rub-softsec/onelogon https://github.com/Pennyw0rth/NetExec/pull/1291 From: https://x.com/al3x_n3ff/status/206948262…

👍19🔥11🥰6🤔3🎉1

Signed Ralf Hacker

14 Jun 2026, 12:28 UTC≈19,300 views29 reactions1 Starread 27 September 2026

Maor Sabag выпустил вторую часть своего крутого ресерча https://maorsabag.github.io/posts/adaptix-stealthpalace/sleeping-beauty-ii/ Если вам интересны SleepMask, StackSpoofing и все, что с этим связано, обязательно посмотрите блог #evasion #redteam #pentest #dev

🔥16👍8🎉3🤔2

Signed Ralf Hacker

11 Jun 2026, 11:04 UTC≈15,900 views73 reactions1 Starread 27 September 2026
Advertisement

NightmareEclipse продолжает свой крестовый поход против Microsoft. После позавчерашнего LPE RoguePlanet, уже сегодня он опубликовал обход BitLocker. Все PoC'и автор выкладывает тут, после того как Microsoft удалил его аккаунты на Github и Gitlab. И того, полный список: 1. GreatXML - Обход BitLocker через MS Defender. Unpatched 2. RoguePlanet - LPE через Race condition в MS Defender. Unpatched 3. MiniPlasma - LPE …

👍47🔥18🎉4😁4

Signed Ralf Hacker

9 Jun 2026, 20:06 UTC≈13,800 views29 reactionsread 27 September 2026
Photo

Лучше чем на скрине не опишешь. На самом деле очень серьезная бага🤔 https://labs.infoguard.ch/posts/ghost-sender/ Особенно интересен ресерч по той причине, что как не раз бывало Майкрософт назвали это архитектурным ограничением, а не уязвимостью, так что фикса не будет🙈 по крайней мере в ближайшее время... #phishing #pentest #redteam

🔥21👍5😱3

Signed Ralf Hacker

9 Jun 2026, 18:40 UTC≈12,200 views17 reactionsread 27 September 2026

Классная статья по Module Stomping с хорошим data driven подходом https://medium.com/@toneillcodes/advanced-evasion-tradecraft-precision-module-stomping-b51feb0978fe #pentest #redteam #inject

🔥11👍5🙏1

Signed Ralf Hacker

Showing the 12 most recent of 24 posts we hold for @RalfHackerChannel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Ralf Hacker Channel” (@RalfHackerChannel), 28,261 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/RalfHackerChannel.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.