Religion β a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channelβs own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 72% confidence. This is a modelβs judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured β it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
63 measurements spanning 94 days, net -729. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between β snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean βno change observedβ, never βinterpolatedβ. The vertical axis spans 15,139β16,086 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log β every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 63
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
8 Nov 2026, 00:10
15,248
-6
6 Nov 2026, 20:45
15,254
-5
5 Nov 2026, 23:36
15,259
-11
5 Nov 2026, 02:41
15,270
-7
4 Nov 2026, 05:30
15,277
-8
3 Nov 2026, 07:48
15,285
-6
2 Nov 2026, 09:56
15,291
-10
1 Nov 2026, 06:36
15,301
-6
31 Oct 2026, 09:11
15,307
-8
30 Oct 2026, 08:58
15,315
-9
29 Oct 2026, 08:16
15,324
-5
28 Oct 2026, 06:48
15,329
-8
27 Oct 2026, 06:17
15,337
-9
26 Oct 2026, 08:39
15,346
-7
25 Oct 2026, 07:56
15,353
-7
24 Oct 2026, 08:46
15,360
-3
23 Oct 2026, 06:29
15,363
-13
22 Oct 2026, 03:17
15,376
-24
20 Oct 2026, 20:16
15,400
-10
19 Oct 2026, 21:38
15,410
first reading
Engagement
25 posts held, back to 29 January 2026 β the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelβs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 66 pages of Telegramβs post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR Β· 30 days
3.75%
avg views Γ· 15,248 subscribers
Avg views / post
572
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.36%
reactions Γ· views Β· ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 25 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) Γ· views β note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegramβs public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 2 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days Β· latest post in window 6 November 2026
Posts held
25 (29 January 2026 β 6 November 2026)
Views total
1,143
Reactions total
13
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface β not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
8 Nov 2026, 17:41 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than βcorrectingβ the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form β 8.12K, 3.7M β so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded β read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
972
Videos
9
Links
91
Lifetime counters from Telegramβs own channel header, read 8 November 2026 β not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegramβs rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
44s
Average length
44s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel β not this channelβs whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegramβs own rounded chrome, so it carries no β mark.
Reaction mix
272 reactions across 23 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 92.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
β€
252
92.6%
π₯
12
4.41%
π
4
1.47%
π’
4
1.47%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β π is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β 4.34K, 1.2M β so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 23 of the 25 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramβs own count on each post β not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β those same posts carry 272 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by βa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageβ.
Measured over the 25 most recent posts we hold, published 29 January 2026 to 6 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegramβs own βeditedβ marker: 0 of 2 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before β this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Dadku waxay xasuusan karaan magacyadooda iyo mowqifkooda, laakiin waxa inta badan ku haray xusuusteena waa sida ay noola dhaqmeen markii aysan wax faa'iido ah naga helin. Ficillada yaryar waxaa laga yaabaa inaysan u muuqan kuwo muhiim u ah waqtigaas la jogo, laakiin badanaa waxay muujiyaan wax badan oo ku saabsan dabeecadda marka loo eego kuwa waaweyn.
Waa dareen xun inaad dhawaan ogaato ama aadan ilaa hada ogeen inaad had iyo jeer ku dayaneeso in wax aad u jacaylaato sida qof kale ama aad asxaab u sameesato sida aad ka aragto Social media yaha oo aan waxba kusoo kordhin ilaa hada noloshaada.
Ku noolow noloshada saxda ah qofna isku taarikh ma noqon kartan
Ha u akhrin sida carruurtu u akhriyaan,sido kale ha u akhrin madadaalo ahaan, ama sida kuwa doonaya inay aqoon u yeeshaan ee u akhri si aad u noolaato, waayo akhrisku waa nolol.
β Gustave Flaubert
Showing the 12 most recent of 25 posts we hold for @QalbiDhaye143. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 34 registered channels β every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched β that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting todayβs namer to yesterdayβs owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason β naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides β the βNamed by N registered channelsβ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegramβs recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly β each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone elseβs query is independent of having been queried itself.
SOMALI LIBRARY @Somalilibrary Β· 73,467 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 75 here β alongside 74 others β read 19 August 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegramβs list for THAT channel, not this one β see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 November 2026 β this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
βQalbi Dhayeπ‘β (@QalbiDhaye143), 15,248 subscribers as measured 8 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/QalbiDhaye143.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
