Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

AL XAKIIM CHANNEL

@Al_xakiim

On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

18,443subscribers

-12 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001485507043
TypeChannel
Username@Al_xakiim
DescriptionHankiinu yuusan noqon kaliya inaad Aduunka heer sare ka gaadhaan, balse waa in Hankiinu noqdaa meel ka saraysa halkaas oo ah raali ahaanshaha Allaah iyo Janadiisa. Waxadna si toos nagala soo xiriiri kartaan: @Bin_Yusuf143
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 31 August 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Al_xakiim

Topic

Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (4 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@Al_xakiim/5241 · this entry2 Aug 2026, 04:24 UTC@sabarka143/5752 Aug 2026, 04:24 UTC1.00under a minute
@sabarka143/5762 Aug 2026, 16:34 UTC@Al_xakiim/5242 · this entry2 Aug 2026, 16:35 UTC1.00under a minute
@sabarka143/56515 Jul 2026, 16:23 UTC@Al_xakiim/5235 · this entry15 Jul 2026, 16:31 UTC0.998 minutes
@sabarka143/56618 Jul 2026, 12:46 UTC@Al_xakiim/5236 · this entry18 Jul 2026, 12:47 UTC0.9672 seconds
Every channel this entry shares post bodies with
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@sabarka1436 (6/6 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.99under a minute@sabarka143 (51)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 3 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 16 comparable posts for this entry, running 6 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Across the whole group of 2, the earliest publisher we hold is @sabarka143. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the key clone_copy, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

18,43318,45518,4446 August 2026 — 18,455 subscribers6 August 2026 — 18,449 subscribers8 August 2026 — 18,444 subscribers8 August 2026 — 18,435 subscribers10 August 2026 — 18,433 subscribers11 August 2026 — 18,443 subscribers18,4436 August 202611 August 2026
6 measurements spanning 5 days, net -12. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 18,430–18,458 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 02:1218,443+10
10 Aug 2026, 00:0218,433-2
8 Aug 2026, 23:0118,435-9
8 Aug 2026, 02:1118,444-5
6 Aug 2026, 22:5318,449-6
6 Aug 2026, 09:1718,455first reading

Engagement

22 posts held, back to 6 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
5.85%
avg views ÷ 18,443 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,080
15 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.58%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
15
of 22 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 14 of 15 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026
Posts held22 (6 July 202610 August 2026)
Views total16,182
Reactions total250
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken13 Aug 2026, 00:08 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
2,820
Videos
111
Links
499

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

379 reactions across 21 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 96.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
36596.3%
👍82.11%
👏30.792%
😁20.528%
🔥10.264%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 21 of the 22 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 379reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 6 July 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

10 Aug 2026, 17:16 UTC371 viewsread 13 August 2026

━━━━ 1️⃣ 🌙 Diinta & Duunyada 🌙 15k 👉 👉 Taabo halkan 🌙 20k 👉 👉 Taabo halkan 🌙 16k 👉 👉 Taabo halkan 🌙 18k 👉 👉 Taabo halkan 🌙 20k 👉 👉 Taabo halkan 🌙 19k 👉 👉 Taabo halkan 🌙 17k 👉 👉 Taabo halkan 🌙 26k 👉 👉 Taabo halkan ━━━━━━━━━━━ 2️⃣ ✨ Aqoon & Xikmado 🚺🅰️ ✨ 18k 👉 👉 Taabo halkan ✨ 20k 👉 👉 Taabo halkan ✨ 26k 👉 👉 Taabo halkan ✨ 18k 👉 👉 Taabo halkan ✨ 42k 👉 👉 Taabo halkan ✨ 16k 👉 👉 Taabo halkan ✨ 20k 👉 👉 Taabo halkan ✨ 19k 👉

Signed Channel Help

10 Aug 2026, 05:26 UTC468 views8 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

🤲 Ducadaadu Ma Daahday Mise Jawaabteedu Way Soo Socotaa? 🌧️✨ Mararka qaar waad ducaysataa, waad sugtaa, haddana waxaad is leedahay: “Maxaa ducadayda loo aqbali waayay?” Laakiin xusuusnow: Allah wuu maqlaa ducadaada, wuxuuna kuu doorayaa waxa kuu kheyr badan. 🤲 🌿 1. Ha u malayn in Allah ku illoobay Aamusnaanta jawaabtu macnaheedu ma aha in Allah ku dayacay. Wuu ku maqlayaa. ⏳ 2. Waxaa laga yaabaa in waqtigeedu uusa

8

Signed 𝐇𝐚𝐟𝐬𝐚____𝐍𝐁🎀🫶🏼

9 Aug 2026, 14:33 UTC476 views16 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Forwarded from @sabarka143Photo

Quraanka waa qowlkii allah markaa akhrinayso adiga dhan waxaa dareemysaa huduuu iyo daganaaan noloshaadane waxay noqonee mid xasilooon oo aad udagan ku dadaal in aadan maalin noqon bilaa quraaan.🎀🌸

16

8 Aug 2026, 07:57 UTC631 views8 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Ma ahan saaxiib qof walbood is xeriirisaan Mana aha qof ku jecel qof walbood isku ra’yi tihiin Saaxiibadda wanaagsan waa midda si qalbiyan eh ugu faraxda farxadaada, oo kuu duceysa adiga oo maqan, aanan kula xaman dadka, aan ku barin oon kuusoo share gareyn heesaha iyo aflaanta haddeey ku aragto adiga oo waddo qaldan ku socdana gacanta kaa qabata ee kaasoo celisa, ma ahan midda kugu sii dhiira gelisa U dooro saaxiba

8

Signed 𝐇𝐚𝐟𝐬𝐚____𝐍𝐁🎀🫶🏼

8 Aug 2026, 04:34 UTC572 views7 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Qof walba Wuxuu leeyahay laba indhood balse qof walba sida aad wax u aragtid uma arko, Noloshaan waa inaad barataa sida loo noolaado kaligaa si taxaddar leh, xitaa haddii baqdinta kugu xeeran tahay mid aan la soo koobi karin, waxaad ka gudbi doontaa imtixaanno badan oo dulqaad ah, cidna kuma caawin doonto ilaa aad ka guuleesato.

7

7 Aug 2026, 09:34 UTC654 views11 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Forwarded from @sabarka143Photo

4 sheey oo kaliya ayaad u baahantahay in aad sameyso maalinka jimcaha: 🤎 In aad jaajareyso ruuxdaada: Adiga oo dukanaya salaaddi jimce oo aqrinaya suuratul kahf iyo salliga nabiga scw oo la imaanaya acmaal wanwanaagsan. 🤎 In aad la kulanto ehelkaaga ood hal meel ku wada qadeysaan: Waayo waxaa laga yaabaa in isbuuc oo dhan ay idin mashquuliyeen waxbarashada iyo shaqada, maalinka jimcaadne waa fursaddi aad isku warey

11

Signed 𝐇𝐚𝐟𝐬𝐚____𝐍𝐁🎀🫶🏼

7 Aug 2026, 07:46 UTC660 views9 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Kaalay xbbti samee intan oo noqo gabar fariid ah: ✅Ha u sheegin saaxiibtaa ama qof aad is taqaanaan calaamad ama honqor ama barr aad ku leedahay meelaha aan muuqan ee jirkaaga waayo biri nin ayaa ogaan kara oo si uu kuu ceebeeyo calaamadahaas qarsoon jirkaaga ka sheegi kara. 🌹 ✅Haku shanleysan guri aan gurigiina aheyn oo ha iskaga jarin cijiyaha hana uga tagin timahaaga shanlada iyo musqusha, aruuri mar walba timaha

7😁2

Signed 𝐇𝐚𝐟𝐬𝐚____𝐍𝐁🎀🫶🏼

2 Aug 2026, 16:35 UTC≈1,030 views19 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Rasuulku {ﷺ} waxa uu yidhi: “Ilaahay ka baqa oo ubadkiina u caddaalad sameeya”. –Bukhaari.❤️🍃 Xadiisku waxa uu leeyahay Qiso! Saxaaxbiga Nucmaan ibnu Bashiir RC waxa uu yidhi: Aabbahay ayaa xoolihiisa wax kamid ah igu sadaqadaystay oo isiiyay. Hooyaday Camra bintu Rawaaxah ayaa waxa ay ku tidhi: “Ma raalli noqonayo ilaa aad markhaati geliso Rasuulka Ilaahay waxa aad siisay Nucmaan”.❤️🍃 Aabbahay ayaa i kaxeeyay oo R

18👍1

Signed 𝐇𝐚𝐟𝐬𝐚____𝐍𝐁🎀🫶🏼

2 Aug 2026, 04:24 UTC≈1,040 views25 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Nabi Muxammed Sallalaahu Caleyhi Wasallam wuxuu yiri: "Qofkii ku waabariista asagoo amni qaba, caafimaad heysta, sidoo kale wixii uu maalinkaas quudan lahaana heysta, wuxuu lamid yahay asagoo soo koobay adduunyo iyo wixii ku dhex jira oo dhan." Subax wanaagsan saaxiibayaal.

24👍1

29 Jul 2026, 17:51 UTC≈1,340 views25 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Forwarded from @sabarka143Photo

Istiqfaartu waa nolosha qalbiga🥹🫶🏻 Markastoo istiqfarta badisid Waxa kordhaysa farxadada iyo liibantada. Waxana rumoobaysa wax kastoo jeceshay oo khayr leh marka aan badino istiqfarta 🥰👋🏻 أستغفر الله العظيم وأتوب إليه 📿💕

25

Signed 𝐇𝐚𝐟𝐬𝐚____𝐍𝐁🎀🫶🏼

29 Jul 2026, 17:26 UTC≈1,220 views10 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Oraah baa waxay leedahay: Hadaf aad leedahay marnaba sida ugu fiican ugama dhabayn kartid Adiga oo aan jeclaanin waxa aad qabaneyso.

10

28 Jul 2026, 18:55 UTC≈1,350 views14 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Hadii aad rabtaan jaceylkiina inuu weynaado waligiisna uu jiro: Wiilow indhahaga laab, Gabareey adigana indhaha laab. Waayo Intaad indhaha taageysan Jaceyl iska dhaafe xiiso xita idinma sii jirayo.

14

Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @Al_xakiim. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 92,094 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 32 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“AL XAKIIM CHANNEL” (@Al_xakiim), 18,443 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Al_xakiim.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.